4 wins would be a miracle with the schedule6-6 would be a miracle for UK
Bill Belichek.... I don't think he is going to be wildly successful but I wouldn't rule it out either.Who is the next rich brooks? Wih NIL and all the upgrades a guy like that could win and win big now.
6-6 would be a miracle for UK
Stoops buyout does not go down that much next year. If we fire him after next year it’s the 2nd largest buyout ever paid. I can’t believe any UK fan that has known Mitch would ever believe he would pay that.Sporting News has their way too early Top 25 rankings for next year. We have the following on our schedule:
1. Texas
3. Georgia
11. Florida
12. Tennessee
14. South Carolina
17. Ole Miss
23. Louisville
If I'm being completely honest, I'd much rather have this schedule and go 3-9/4-8 than have an easier schedule and go 6-6. 6-6 would sit really well with Mitch I'm afraid and he would be complacent. If we finish 3-9/4-8, I think Mitch has no choice but to make a move.
This is where we are unfortunately. The easiest solution for EVERYONE(Stoops, Mitch, Fans) is for Coach Stoops to turn this thing around next season. Unfortunately, we have one of, if not THE toughest schedule in America next season. However, Coach Stoops seems to do his best when NO ONE thinks he can. Hope he can prove the world WRONG and put this program back to where it was 5 years ago.Stoops buyout does not go down that much next year. If we fire him after next year it’s the 2nd largest buyout ever paid. I can’t believe any UK fan that has known Mitch would ever believe he would pay that.
We are stuck with Stoops. We need to hope he turns it around.
I disagree. It will go from $41 million to $34 million after the upcoming season. If they have another terrible season, ticket sales will decline drastically. With 8 home games in the 2026 season, a dip in attendance by an average of 10,000 a game would be about an $8 million dollar hit in revenue.Stoops buyout does not go down that much next year. If we fire him after next year it’s the 2nd largest buyout ever paid. I can’t believe any UK fan that has known Mitch would ever believe he would pay that.
We are stuck with Stoops. We need to hope he turns it around.
He will have no choice but to make a move. I still firmly believe UK will be able to negotiate the timeframe in which the buyout is paid. That’s a big key to me.
Why do you believe UK will be able to negotiate the time frame? What does UK have to offer that would be attractive to MS for him to agree to defer the oney?
There is a faction that thinks stoops is an old midwestern guy that will do the ‘right thing’ if he can’t get it done. I’m just telling anybody that thinks that they are way off base. He’s a guy that will get his money one way or the other. I’m not saying I blame him but anyone that thinks he’ll do everybody a favor is mistaken.I don't understand the confidence ofCMS negotiating a buyout. If it gets to that point he is being fired, why do the one firing you any favors? I would want every penny the contract called for and think most people would. I just can't see him saying " you are firing me and I am owed 40m dollars, but will you please only give me 20m".
Stoops buyout does not go down that much next year. If we fire him after next year it’s the 2nd largest buyoutiever paid. I can’t believe any UK fan that has known Mitch would ever believe he would pay that.Sporting News has their way too early Top 25 rankings for next year. We have the following on our schedule:
1. Texas
3. Georgia
11. Florida
12. Tennessee
14. South Carolina
17. Ole Miss
23. Louisville
If I'm being completely honest, I'd much rather have this schedule and go 3-9/4-8 than have an easier schedule and go 6-6. 6-6 would sit really well with Mitch I'm afraid and he would be complacent. If we finish 3-9/4-8, I think Mitch has no choice but to make a move.
this is my thinking. Stoops holds all the cards. If I got a full house, I’m not negotiating shit. My bourbon company is here, my house is here. My friends are here. Why would he have any interest in negotiating??Why do you believe UK will be able to negotiate the time frame? What does UK have to offer that would be attractive to MS for him to agree to defer the money?
I believe Mitch and Stoops have a really good relationship. If Stoops struggled to another 4-8 season next year, I think he’d understand why he was being let go…hell, I could even see where the split was mutual as Stoops might have had enough.Why do you believe UK will be able to negotiate the time frame? What does UK have to offer that would be attractive to MS for him to agree to defer the money?
There is a faction that thinks stoops is an old midwestern guy that will do the ‘right thing’ if he can’t get it done. I’m just telling anybody that thinks that they are way off base. He’s a guy that will get his money one way or the other. I’m not saying I blame him but anyone that thinks he’ll do everybody a favor is mistaken.
It's really not hard to understand. The bozos are waiting to renegotiate the TV contract because ESPN has refused to pay more for the extra game.When will the bozos at the sec office figure out a long term schedule? That's what I want to know.
Are we gonna rotate 7 on 7 off for 2026 and 2027? And keep sc as our annual. I think the 7 on might be a slightly easier schedule but idk. Alabama, lsu, Oklahoma, a and m, Missouri, sc, msu and Arkansas. Yeah actually I don't see us doing much with that either.
He's smoking hopium.Why do you believe UK will be able to negotiate the time frame? What does UK have to offer that would be attractive to MS for him to agree to defer the money?
You realize you can look these things up before you comment, right? There is zero difference in tax rate between someone making $5mm or $35mm in a year. For a single earner the highest tax bracket begins at $626k.I believe Mitch and Stoops have a really good relationship. If Stoops struggled to another 4-8 season next year, I think he’d understand why he was being let go…hell, I could even see where the split was mutual as Stoops might have had enough.
From a tax perspective alone, I would think that taking $34 million over 5 years would be much friendlier on taxes then taken as a lump sum.
Regardless of how it’s paid out, I believe if it’s another bad year, he will not be the coach here in 2026.
My CPA mother is going to be really disappointed in me! Disregard that part of my post.You realize you can look these things up before you comment, right? There is zero difference in tax rate between someone making $5mm or $35mm in a year. For a single earner the highest tax bracket begins at $626k.
$34 million over 3 years, 5 years, or 10 years will all be in the same tax bracket, the maximum. Taking the money over time only benefits our school. The present value of the dollar and lost investment time for Stoops is a big hit for him. I can't see any way Stoops would or maybe should take the money over time.I believe Mitch and Stoops have a really good relationship. If Stoops struggled to another 4-8 season next year, I think he’d understand why he was being let go…hell, I could even see where the split was mutual as Stoops might have had enough.
From a tax perspective alone, I would think that taking $34 million over 5 years would be much friendlier on taxes then taken as a lump sum.
Regardless of how it’s paid out, I believe if it’s another bad year, he will not be the coach here in 2026.
Yep…someone already corrected me on that. I still firmly believe if he goes 4-8 again, he’s gone, whether it’s all paid at once or over a period of time. The program cannot take another hit like that.$34 million over 3 years, 5 years, or 10 years will all be in the same tax bracket, the maximum. Taking the money over time only benefits our school. The present value of the dollar and lost investment time for Stoops is a big hit for him. I can't see any way Stoops would or maybe should take the money over time.
I really hate to let Barnhart hire another coach for our football program.Yep…someone already corrected me on that. I still firmly believe if he goes 4-8 again, he’s gone, whether it’s all paid at once or over a period of time. The program cannot take another hit like that.
Stoops was a good hire…the mistake was the length of the contract extension (same with Cal). For an AD that has been at a school for 20+ years, he’s made relatively good hires and moved on from bad ones pretty quick. He sucks immensely at extensions and long-term contracts. I fear those more than I fear hires.I really hate to let Barnhart hire another coach for our football program.
I appreciate and understand your thoughts. The concern is we all know Barnhart is most likely nearing retirement. A high end coach would like to think his boss, the AD that hires him, will be in place for years. As crazy as it might seem, a new AD likes to put his stamp on his empire, the Athletic Dept. Easiest way is to hire coaches. If a coach is hired by an AD that is till in place and the coach has a tough year, he will be less likely to be fired by the AD that hired him vs a new AD looking to make a statement. Barnhart is too close to retirement to be hiring a new football coach. Just a thought, I certainly have never hired a coach and never will.Stoops was a good hire…the mistake was the length of the contract extension (same with Cal). For an AD that has been at a school for 20+ years, he’s made relatively good hires and moved on from bad ones pretty quick. He sucks immensely at extensions and long-term contracts. I fear those more than I fear hires.