Agreed. This isn't a random Saturday mid-season and you want to show off some new threads. This is the NC game. Wear your colors.Originally posted by fballcats76:
I hate that Oregon didn't show their school colors for this game. They should have went all white with Green helmets or something.
Oregon wore gray, white and gray with highlighter yellow #'s and socks/shoes in their title game vs Auburn a few years ago.Originally posted by HeismanCatNole85:
How and who decides what uniform Oregon is wearing for their games? I don't think they wore the same uniform twice all season. They have some cool uniforms but way too many options. How do you even keep track of all of those as an equipment manager?
I'd be slightly bothered by this as an Oregon fan/player/alum that your first national title game will not even feature your actual colors. This would be like Kentucky wearing no blue at all. I'm also, perplexed why Oregon is wearing the away uniforms as the higher seed? Odd.
Wrong! Oregon is the prime example of what happens when your biggest booster is the founder and chairman of Nike and worth over $20 billion. Phil Knight has gifted Oregon over $1 billion...yes more than $1 billion dollars. And that's just in the past 6 months! It doesn't count the $100's of millions he has poured into their program in prior years. (Not all of that money has gone to athletics but a substantial sum has done so)Originally posted by KentUcKy-Kats:
Oregon is the prime example of what full administration support for a program can do. They have gotten the fans, boosters, and players to buy in, but it has not been a quick overnight process.
I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM radio yesterday. Rick (who was the head coach at Colorado at the time) was talking about how after their trips to the Rose bowl (lost) and Cotton bowl (lost to Rick's Colorado team) in the mid 90's the boosters and administration got together and the boosters basically said what is it going to take to win the whole thing. Since then the school has been investing vigorously, marketing nation wide, and creating a brand (i.e. uniforms) for the program and it has finally paid off.
It sounds crazy, but the uniforms have become one of Oregon's biggest marketing campaigns. So much so that it will probably be discussed in marketing text books one day, if not already. It really has become an amazing asset for them.
Oregon has a great program and solid leadership and commitment to success. However, haviung the leader of one of the 4 or 5 most powerful brands in the country/world probably helps out. Without Phil Knight, nothing really happens.Originally posted by KentUcKy-Kats:
Oregon is the prime example of what full administration support for a program can do. They have gotten the fans, boosters, and players to buy in, but it has not been a quick overnight process.
I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM radio yesterday. Rick (who was the head coach at Colorado at the time) was talking about how after their trips to the Rose bowl (lost) and Cotton bowl (lost to Rick's Colorado team) in the mid 90's the boosters and administration got together and the boosters basically said what is it going to take to win the whole thing. Since then the school has been investing vigorously, marketing nation wide, and creating a brand (i.e. uniforms) for the program and it has finally paid off.
It sounds crazy, but the uniforms have become one of Oregon's biggest marketing campaigns. So much so that it will probably be discussed in marketing text books one day, if not already. It really has become an amazing asset for them.
I believe Nutter gave 8 million for the Nutter Fieldhouse.Originally posted by fuzz77:
Wrong! Oregon is the prime example of what happens when your biggest booster is the founder and chairman of Nike and worth over $20 billion. Phil Knight has gifted Oregon over $1 billion...yes more than $1 billion dollars. And that's just in the past 6 months! It doesn't count the $100's of millions he has poured into their program in prior years. (Not all of that money has gone to athletics but a substantial sum has done so)Originally posted by KentUcKy-Kats:
Oregon is the prime example of what full administration support for a program can do. They have gotten the fans, boosters, and players to buy in, but it has not been a quick overnight process.
I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM radio yesterday. Rick (who was the head coach at Colorado at the time) was talking about how after their trips to the Rose bowl (lost) and Cotton bowl (lost to Rick's Colorado team) in the mid 90's the boosters and administration got together and the boosters basically said what is it going to take to win the whole thing. Since then the school has been investing vigorously, marketing nation wide, and creating a brand (i.e. uniforms) for the program and it has finally paid off.
It sounds crazy, but the uniforms have become one of Oregon's biggest marketing campaigns. So much so that it will probably be discussed in marketing text books one day, if not already. It really has become an amazing asset for them.
Phil Knight donated $68 million to UO to build a 145,000 sq ft football facility in 2013. He basically financed their $200 million basketball arena in 2010... in 2007 he gave their K-Fund equivalent a $100 million gift...in 2002 he gave them $30 million to expand their football stadium... To put that all in perspective, Joe Craft, UK's biggest/wealthiest donor gave $6.5 million for construction of the Craft Center which is UK Athletics largest single donation. The largest donation for the new football facility being built at UK is $1 million.
UO doesn't need to lobby the state for bonding because "Uncle Phil" will personally finance pretty much whatever they want.
It's pretty easy to "invest" when the world's 23rd richest man is your ATM. When you read "University of Oregon boosters" you are essentially saying "Phil Knight" because Phil Knight > All remaining boosters combined...and it's not even close.
It's easy to say..."We should do what Oregon is doing..."...problem is Oregon has one man who is probably worth more than the entire net worth of the 100 largest UK boosters combined and who freely donates his money. Without Phil Knight Oregon wouldn't be doing a fraction of what they do. Kudos to their administration for cashing his checks!
He gave 1.6 million.Originally posted by zannmann:
I believe Nutter gave 8 million for the Nutter Fieldhouse.Originally posted by fuzz77:
Wrong! Oregon is the prime example of what happens when your biggest booster is the founder and chairman of Nike and worth over $20 billion. Phil Knight has gifted Oregon over $1 billion...yes more than $1 billion dollars. And that's just in the past 6 months! It doesn't count the $100's of millions he has poured into their program in prior years. (Not all of that money has gone to athletics but a substantial sum has done so)Originally posted by KentUcKy-Kats:
Oregon is the prime example of what full administration support for a program can do. They have gotten the fans, boosters, and players to buy in, but it has not been a quick overnight process.
I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM radio yesterday. Rick (who was the head coach at Colorado at the time) was talking about how after their trips to the Rose bowl (lost) and Cotton bowl (lost to Rick's Colorado team) in the mid 90's the boosters and administration got together and the boosters basically said what is it going to take to win the whole thing. Since then the school has been investing vigorously, marketing nation wide, and creating a brand (i.e. uniforms) for the program and it has finally paid off.
It sounds crazy, but the uniforms have become one of Oregon's biggest marketing campaigns. So much so that it will probably be discussed in marketing text books one day, if not already. It really has become an amazing asset for them.
Phil Knight donated $68 million to UO to build a 145,000 sq ft football facility in 2013. He basically financed their $200 million basketball arena in 2010... in 2007 he gave their K-Fund equivalent a $100 million gift...in 2002 he gave them $30 million to expand their football stadium... To put that all in perspective, Joe Craft, UK's biggest/wealthiest donor gave $6.5 million for construction of the Craft Center which is UK Athletics largest single donation. The largest donation for the new football facility being built at UK is $1 million.
UO doesn't need to lobby the state for bonding because "Uncle Phil" will personally finance pretty much whatever they want.
It's pretty easy to "invest" when the world's 23rd richest man is your ATM. When you read "University of Oregon boosters" you are essentially saying "Phil Knight" because Phil Knight > All remaining boosters combined...and it's not even close.
It's easy to say..."We should do what Oregon is doing..."...problem is Oregon has one man who is probably worth more than the entire net worth of the 100 largest UK boosters combined and who freely donates his money. Without Phil Knight Oregon wouldn't be doing a fraction of what they do. Kudos to their administration for cashing his checks!
So did you miss the whole point of what I was saying, or are you just wanting to argue?Originally posted by fuzz77:
Wrong! Oregon is the prime example of what happens when your biggest booster is the founder and chairman of Nike and worth over $20 billion. Phil Knight has gifted Oregon over $1 billion...yes more than $1 billion dollars. And that's just in the past 6 months! It doesn't count the $100's of millions he has poured into their program in prior years. (Not all of that money has gone to athletics but a substantial sum has done so)Originally posted by KentUcKy-Kats:
Oregon is the prime example of what full administration support for a program can do. They have gotten the fans, boosters, and players to buy in, but it has not been a quick overnight process.
I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM radio yesterday. Rick (who was the head coach at Colorado at the time) was talking about how after their trips to the Rose bowl (lost) and Cotton bowl (lost to Rick's Colorado team) in the mid 90's the boosters and administration got together and the boosters basically said what is it going to take to win the whole thing. Since then the school has been investing vigorously, marketing nation wide, and creating a brand (i.e. uniforms) for the program and it has finally paid off.
It sounds crazy, but the uniforms have become one of Oregon's biggest marketing campaigns. So much so that it will probably be discussed in marketing text books one day, if not already. It really has become an amazing asset for them.
Phil Knight donated $68 million to UO to build a 145,000 sq ft football facility in 2013. He basically financed their $200 million basketball arena in 2010... in 2007 he gave their K-Fund equivalent a $100 million gift...in 2002 he gave them $30 million to expand their football stadium... To put that all in perspective, Joe Craft, UK's biggest/wealthiest donor gave $6.5 million for construction of the Craft Center which is UK Athletics largest single donation. The largest donation for the new football facility being built at UK is $1 million.
UO doesn't need to lobby the state for bonding because "Uncle Phil" will personally finance pretty much whatever they want.
It's pretty easy to "invest" when the world's 23rd richest man is your ATM. When you read "University of Oregon boosters" you are essentially saying "Phil Knight" because Phil Knight > All remaining boosters combined...and it's not even close.
It's easy to say..."We should do what Oregon is doing..."...problem is Oregon has one man who is probably worth more than the entire net worth of the 100 largest UK boosters combined and who freely donates his money. Without Phil Knight Oregon wouldn't be doing a fraction of what they do. Kudos to their administration for cashing his checks!