I've been hoping for it to be so bad, that's it's good, but it sounds like it might not even be that.
76% on rotten tomatoes after 41 reviews. Not bad.
Possibly. 76 after 41 reviews is pretty solid.Must be one of those 'save all the good jokes for the movie' movie. or it's only 41 reviews.
Or Sony's paying them to say good things about the movie.Must be one of those 'save all the good jokes for the movie' movie. or it's only 41 reviews.
Yeah that's probably it.Or Sony's paying them to say good things about the movie.
Possibly. 76 after 41 reviews is pretty solid.
Same here. Except 2 week old son. Don't plan on watching it either. Not my thing. But I work in the industry so I like to track everything. Did see the lobster about a week before my son was born. Best film I've seen this year.Will wait and reserve judgement until I don't see it.
(To be fair, I'm not seeing anything this summer except my 1 month old daughter.)
Same here. Except 2 week old son. Don't plan on watching it either. Not my thing. But I work in the industry so I like to track everything. Did see the lobster about a week before my son was born. Best film I've seen this year.
It is very odd, but brilliant. And hilariously dark as hell. The director's second feature film Dogtooth is a must watch as well. And much weirder.That movie looks weiiiird.
(Putting it on netflix list.)
They should send out more considering every film they've released this year, with the exception of the Shallows, is certified rotten.I wonder how many gift baskets or trips Sony sent out this week.
Before everyone acts like it's a ridiculous conspiracy, 20th Century Fox gave us a two day trip, free gifts and tactical training with LAPD just so we'd say something good about a movie that was premiering and find a way to shamelessly plug one of their sponsors products in the article.
Happens all the time.
They should send out more considering every film they've released this year, with the exception of the Shallows, is certified rotten.
Because you got a bunch of money men making artistic decisions. Sucks. There are some good studios out there though.I just want to be in the pitch room when stuff like this is heard and approved. Considering most films lose money, you'd think they wouldn't waste their time with films they know they have no chance of turning a profit or getting an award for (just talking in general not GB).
76% on rotten tomatoes after 41 reviews. Not bad.
Blow? Hahaha What are you 18? Blow is shit. I'm sure this Ghostbusters is shit too. What does Wenders' Paris, Texas have on rotten tomatoes? Bergman's Persona? Renoir'sRotten Tomatoes is awful. The best movies rate low, the worst movies rate high. Blow (2001) rates a 53, Feminazi Ghostbusters rate 76.
Looking at that pitiful site to rate movies is worse than getting news from the Onion.
Blow? Hahaha What are you 18? Blow is shit. I'm sure this Ghostbusters is shit too. What does Wenders' Paris, Texas have on rotten tomatoes? Bergman's Persona? Renoir's
LA RÈGLE DU JEU? Blow haha That's funny. Rotten tomatoes is a collection of critic reviews. They're not just arbitrarily rating movies over there. It's not my first source to check the legitimacy of a film, I mostly use the festivals as an indicator, but it's a fair assessment most of the time.
Blow is probably the 10th best movie where Johnny Depp snorts cocaine.
but this ISNT a money decision made by those wanting to make more money, this is a social decision, a political decision. chalk Papa John up as another dumb money man pumping cash & his face into supporting this disaster - why, so he won't have a finger pointed at him saying "you support MEN blockbuster moves & sports all the time, when are you gonna do the same for FEMALES! Sexist!!!"Because you got a bunch of money men making artistic decisions. Sucks. There are some good studios out there though.
Speaking of Depp, that guy has fallen off big time. He hasn't made a good movie in at least 7 years (never saw Black Mass). I guess when you're almost 60-years-old and you're still pushing the eccentric hipster act who plays "wacky characters," people grow tired of it.
Can't wait for the Lord of the Rings remake that is probably in the pipes somewhere.![]()
He has a new pirates of the carribean movie coming out in 2017. I think this is #5? I've watched 1-3 and all were good. Need to watch #4.Speaking of Depp, that guy has fallen off big time. He hasn't made a good movie in at least 7 years (never saw Black Mass). I guess when you're almost 60-years-old and you're still pushing the eccentric hipster act who plays "wacky characters," people grow tired of it.
Need to watch #4.
millenials shit all over Batman V Superman but will eat this crap sandwich? false.This looks like the Hangover or Bridesmaids version of Ghostbusters. Both are severely overrated trash but the millenials will eat it up.
You really are upset over this. I'm sorry man.but this ISNT a money decision made by those wanting to make more money, this is a social decision, a political decision. chalk Papa John up as another dumb money man pumping cash & his face into supporting this disaster - why, so he won't have a finger pointed at him saying "you support MEN blockbuster moves & sports all the time, when are you gonna do the same for FEMALES! Sexist!!!"
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/help_desk/critics/Everybody's a critic. At least on Rotten Tomatoes. I looked at their alleged 74 percent approval rating for Ghostbusters and not only hadn't I heard of most of these critics -- I'd never even heard of the alleged media outlets they represent. Not too much of a stretch to imagine half these sycophants are running a site out of mom's basement and are overjoyed to get a package of freebies from the studios every month.
Here's a review from someone I had heard of -- Richard Roeper, who took over Roger Ebert's job at the Chicago Sun-Times. He calls it a "Horrifying (unfunny) mess.'
http://chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/ghostbusters-reboot-a-horrifying-mess/
I agree. I won't ever see it. It looks like shit to me. Like everything else coming out this summer. And I have no problem with the all female cast. There will be about 700 films this year that get distribution. And many more that will be relegated solely to the festivals. Less than 1% of all of those will have an all female cast. I just don't get the butt hurt over this particular aspect.Thanks. It'll rise and fall on its own merits, I suppose. I have no beef with this particular movie, except insofar as it illustrates everything wrong with the industry -- boring, uncreative, politically correct, greedy and derivative.
Just guessing, but I'd expect it is that people don't like to feel they are being told to support something on political grounds rather than its merits. For example, in my daily perusal of the NYT, I saw that their critic Manohla Dargis gave the movie a positive review. But when I read what she wrote, it was more a political screed than a movie review. It could have been four women reciting instructions on building a tractor, and she would have endorsed it.I agree. I won't ever see it. It looks like shit to me. Like everything else coming out this summer. And I have no problem with the all female cast. There will be about 700 films this year that get distribution. And many more that will be relegated solely to the festivals. Less than 1% of all of those will have an all female cast. I just don't get the butt hurt over this particular aspect.
ordinarily I might regard that as paranoia, but we're in this weird cultural shifting time, seems almost - almost - like the 60s all over again. so, yeah, have no doubt that "wanting to be on the right side of history" is clouding thinking, and even some money hungry bastards might fall prey....but this ISNT a money decision made by those wanting to make more money, this is a social decision, a political decision. chalk Papa John up as another dumb money man pumping cash & his face into supporting this disaster - why, so he won't have a finger pointed at him saying "you support MEN blockbuster moves & sports all the time, when are you gonna do the same for FEMALES! Sexist!!!"
Iron Man is also being replaced by Doctor Doom ... which is interesting.