New bracketology by Joe

[gharding07]

Palm has us the 2nd 4 seed behind Alabama!

2023 NCAA Tournament Bracket Predictions - Bracketology - College Basketball

CBS Sports is helping you get ready for March Madness with the latest news, picks, and predictions for the 2023 NCAA Basketball Tournament Bracket.

www.cbssports.com

 

[HenryMuto]

Win SEC T and maybe a low end 2 seed. Win 1 gsme in sect were a locked in 3 seec

You know winning the SEC tournament won't matter right ?

 

[gharding07]

You know winning the SEC tournament won't matter right ?

It does(to a point, it's only one game on the resume)

 

[bthaunert]

Only a handful of teams are bubble teams. Anyone could get 65,66 67 or all 68 teams correct.

I see this a lot and I don't totally agree with it. Do we know they are bubble teams bc we read that they are bubble teams? Or, if you (or anyone) didn't have any information from individuals that put brackets together, would you be able to look across college basketball and identify a handful of bubble teams on your own?

 

[DrH. Lecter]

History shows our performance in the SEC tournament has really never helped or hurt us that I remember.

Yep. It seems like they set the upper seeds prior to the SECT and it doesnt really matter.

 

[Cold Stout Beer]

Palm has us the 2nd 4 seed behind Alabama!

2023 NCAA Tournament Bracket Predictions - Bracketology - College Basketball

CBS Sports is helping you get ready for March Madness with the latest news, picks, and predictions for the 2023 NCAA Basketball Tournament Bracket.

www.cbssports.com

 

[The_Answer1313]

I see this a lot and I don't totally agree with it. Do we know they are bubble teams bc we read that they are bubble teams? Or, if you (or anyone) didn't have any information from individuals that put brackets together, would you be able to look across college basketball and identify a handful of bubble teams on your own?

Yeah I think without knowledge of others selections if one was to look in depth they would come to similar conclusions on teams.

I do agree tho. There is a bit of a bias in that someone could essentially just log onto the Bracket Matrix, take the average and get like 66 teams right. Would they know that if they didn't log in tho and were completely without knowledge of others? If they did the research, yes I think so. Look at the NET, look at records in the quads, look at team sheets with the game logs and that gets you the majority of the way IMO.

I will say this tho every year I do this there's a handful of teams (maybe 2 to 4 teams) where they rate out pretty good IMO and I wonder to myself why those teams aren't even being considered.

 

[L.O.D.]

You know winning the SEC tournament won't matter right ?

Making the final will I think.