ADVERTISEMENT

NBA's Mt. Rushmore of 'Empty Stats'

What is weird about Anthony was that he was the best Olympic player for the US that we had many years. He was the star of the best collection of talent we had. Idk why he didn’t try to play like that in the league, granted he didn’t have the help in NYC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zissou87
Not sure if anyone mentioned but I think Chris Paul fits this mold. Just always have found him to be overrated.
 
Last edited:
With the recent announcement of Carmelo Anthony's retirement, it got me to thinking (always a dangerous thing) about players who accumulate empty stats for the majority of their career.

My nominations:
Carmelo Anthony
Russell Westbrook
Allen Iverson
Dominique Wilkins
James Harden

From one perspective, these players have all been excellent-to-great NBA players. However, you can't really say that they made their teammates better and, many times, would have really good seasons while the team floundered. Maybe it's not all their fault, but scoring 34 points while taking 31 shots and having 2 assists while their man scored 27 points, to me, is kind of the definition of empty stats.
Wait a minute, I admit I don't follow the NBA very much at all (close to zero) but Carmelo Anthony was still playing in the NBA this season? Did I read that right? Wow. Anyway, carry on...
 
Pete Maravich, for college and pro.
This was also my first thought, but I didn’t wanna say it because it always stirs up anger here when you do.

But, since you brought it up, YES, absolutely. Pete belongs in this discussion way before any of the guys that the OP listed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zissou87
Wait a minute, I admit I don't follow the NBA very much at all (close to zero) but Carmelo Anthony was still playing in the NBA this season? Did I read that right? Wow. Anyway, carry on...
He didn't play this past season. His last year was with the Lakers in 2021-22.
 
Not Kidd, he actually led some really good teams to the finals.

Agreed, no way Jason Kidd belongs on this list. He won a title with Dallas/Dirk, and lost in Finals twice with the Nets. He is the exact opposite of someone who should be on this list. Every team he ever played for got better when he played. He had one of the top 5 basketball IQs as a player that I've seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STL_Cat
OK...I misunderstood the OP then.
Melo recently announced his retirement last week or so but most pretty much assumed after sitting out a year at his age plus many thinking he was done initially after being bought out by Houston a few years ago that he wasn't coming back. Just a formality thing I guess.

Back to OP, I'm listing DeMar DeRozan as one of the current ones in today's game.
 
We talkin' 'bout PRACTICE!

Iverson was one I waffled on. He was always surrounded by sub-par talent (maybe no one wanted to play with him?) but was what is nicely termed a 'volume scorer', i.e., took a bunch of shots, didn't hit a high %. Don't remember him having big assist totals or noted as a defender. I'd agree he'd be on the bubble but could still be considered, imo.
How can he have big assist totals when one of the best scorers he played with on a Finals team was Dikembe Mutombo?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doodah859
Without Jordan, how many titles did he fight for? Reminds me of Popovich. How many titles did blowhard Popovich fight for w/o superstar Duncan? Zero.

Kerr is a limited PG and would be no one's 3rd option anywhere contending for a title.
I c
Without Jordan, how many titles did he fight for? Reminds me of Popovich. How many titles did blowhard Popovich fight for w/o superstar Duncan? Zero.

Kerr is a limited PG and would be no one's 3rd option anywhere contending for a title.
The same argument you use to trash Popovich and Kerr can be used against Phil Collins or Red Auerbach; neither won a single championship without a superstar leading their teams.
Nobody wins without great players AND good coaching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zissou87
With the recent announcement of Carmelo Anthony's retirement, it got me to thinking (always a dangerous thing) about players who accumulate empty stats for the majority of their career.

My nominations:
Carmelo Anthony
Russell Westbrook
Allen Iverson
Dominique Wilkins
James Harden

From one perspective, these players have all been excellent-to-great NBA players. However, you can't really say that they made their teammates better and, many times, would have really good seasons while the team floundered. Maybe it's not all their fault, but scoring 34 points while taking 31 shots and having 2 assists while their man scored 27 points, to me, is kind of the definition of empty stats.
Wilkins did help the Hawks during his time there.
 
With the recent announcement of Carmelo Anthony's retirement, it got me to thinking (always a dangerous thing) about players who accumulate empty stats for the majority of their career.

My nominations:
Carmelo Anthony
Russell Westbrook
Allen Iverson
Dominique Wilkins
James Harden

From one perspective, these players have all been excellent-to-great NBA players. However, you can't really say that they made their teammates better and, many times, would have really good seasons while the team floundered. Maybe it's not all their fault, but scoring 34 points while taking 31 shots and having 2 assists while their man scored 27 points, to me, is kind of the definition of empty stats.
Iverson and especially Dominique Wilkins don’t belong anywhere near that list. Both of those guys were great players. There organizations were train wrecks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zissou87
It's all about the teammates that surround the players.
The post-Shaq/pre-Gasol era, Kobe was putting up crazy scoring numbers, but was rarely winning. Kobe asked to be traded, so the Lakers get Pau Gasol, Kobe wins an MVP and then reaches the NBA Finals. If not for that trade, are we putting Kobe on the list?
How many of the players mentioned on awful teams were a Pau Gasol away from a deep playoff run? It shows the stupidity of some of the Lebron criticisms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tubbyfan78
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT