My concern about many UK fans (UK-Ark)

[CatsFanIL]

Post 79. You're trying to justify your belief that Arkansas could be one of those teams that surges after one if their better players goes down, because other players will get more chances.

Then, after they beat Georgia at home, you doubled down on it in post 79 (shown below) and refused to consider the opponent.

I was trying to get you to understanfld that out of the 6 games they had played, UGA at home was by far their easiest game. Now they just lost one that was even easier.

So, without further ado, here is the proof you asked for. You are literally trying to argue that Arkansas is better without Fland, because they beat a bad Georgia team at home. Enjoy.

Post 79:

Not really sure what you're arguing at this point - so you're saying that Arkansas is clearly worse without Boogie, correct?

They just won without him. You keep focusing on how bad they were offensively, ok cool - they still won the game, correct? They played their worst offensive game of the season and still won. Maybe they're better defensively now without Boogie? Maybe they're about to get more stops defensively than with Boogie.

Point being, they don't HAVE to have his 15 ppg, especially if they're going to be better defensively. They don't HAVE to get Boogie's 15 pts as long as they get a few more from Adou, a few more from DJ, Knox, Brazille, etc.

I'm not sure how you're going to spin this, or deny you said it, but I'm sure you'll try. Good luck, coach. 😃

Nope, wrong again. I guess we'll ignore all the "maybe's" in that post, convenient for you, eh? Guess hypotheticals just go right over your head as well, eh? Funny, no one else on this board seemed to have trouble grasping the argument, but alas, then there's you.

So again, as simply and elementary as I can make it for you. Just like Kentucky beat Gonzaga without our starting PG, you don't HAVE to have Butler's stats to still win. Arkansas doesn't HAVE to have Boogie's stats to win, as they showed in the Georgia game.

Jakucionis for Illinois averages 15 points, 5 rebs and 5 assists per game. Illinois beat Penn St without him. They don't HAVE to have his season averages to still win games.

UCONN beat Baylor without Alex Karaban, who averages 15 points, 5 rebs and 2 assists per game.

I could go on and on with further actual examples that prove my point, but what's the use.

 

[Digger-Cat]

Nope, wrong again. I guess we'll ignore all the "maybe's" in that post, convenient for you, eh? Guess hypotheticals just go right over your head as well, eh? Funny, no one else on this board seemed to have trouble grasping the argument, but alas, then there's you.

So again, as simply and elementary as I can make it for you. Just like Kentucky beat Gonzaga without our starting PG, you don't HAVE to have Butler's stats to still win. Arkansas doesn't HAVE to have Boogie's stats to win, as they showed in the Georgia game.

Jakucionis for Illinois averages 15 points, 5 rebs and 5 assists per game. Illinois beat Penn St without him. They don't HAVE to have his season averages to still win games.

UCONN beat Baylor without Alex Karaban, who averages 15 points, 5 rebs and 2 assists per game.

I could go on and on with further actual examples that prove my point, but what's the use.

Goodness, you come across as a narcissist. I literally posted what you said, but if you're a narcissist, you'll deny, deny, deny no matter what I say.

So, have a good day