I should have said when nike says "jump," we say "how high?"
So why do we have to share a generic logo with freaking Houston and Buffalo?
Do you see any of the following Nike schools whose branding mark is identical to some low-major?
Georgia
And most of those you list have changed their logo's very little since Nike's existance. UK has been changing since long before Nike came on the scene.^ But all 3 had their logos long before Nike was ever even thought of.
Yes because the small % of fans on social media speak for the entire fan base. Sure do a throw back game and wear it once every couple of years.
This year UK was voted the best Uni's in college FB..was it the power K?? no it was the sweet ass chrome/black/blue Uni's we wore all of which had the interlocking UK. One of the reasons I hate going to the field turf is it limits options. Doing a old school Power K game with a checkered endzone and a 20yd to 20yd sized outline of the state on the field on Thursday night with all of college FB watching would be sweet.
With all the different uni's we wore last season MB is branding UK FB....
If you put the gear for UK, UB, and UH on a table and asked everyday people/fans which was which....90% will get UK right....less than 50% will get UH or UB.
Block K > Old Interlocking UK > New Interlocking UK
That new logo is terrible.
I've got your answer in 3 words... Mitchell Milhouse BarnhardtThe problem is that our logo is almost identical to Houston and Buffalo. I just don't understand why UK is so averse to going whole hog on anything. If you want to "move forward" then go all the way and get something truly cutting edge; don't just change the outline color and marginally change the letter placement.
The reason they said they wouldn't do the Block K is because they don't want to go backwards. That's fine, but if you are eschewing a very popular logo because it is "old", don't role out a logo that's 95% identical to the same one we've had for 20 years and call it progress.
Pass on all 3 of those!! The FB ones are tolerable....but the basketball on looks pathetic...Agree 100%. The new logo is terrible and looks like it was copied from Houston and Buffalo.
Why do you not think they copied UK?.Agree 100%. The new logo is terrible and looks like it was copied from Houston and Buffalo.
Look again. Isn't the checkerboard a UT thing?10+ year season ticket holder been attending UK FOOTBALL games for 30 years....I hate the Power K and never want it back....We are not UT...we don't need to copy the power T.
So maybe they are not out of touch with the "fanbase". The interlocking UK is the best look we have. It crisp, clean, classic and identifiable to UK.
The checkerboard has been around for a few years with UK. It started in 2008 when Nike brought back the "tradition of horse racing in this state with the Secretariat pattern"Look again. Isn't the checkerboard a UT thing?
The checkerboard has been around for a few years with UK. It started in 2008 when Nike brought back the "tradition of horse racing in this state with the Secretariat pattern"
Which makes it just 44 years after Tennessee. It's a Tennessee thing we co-opted anyways because Nike wanted us to, the same reason we used to wear terrible basketball jerseys on the football field, Nike thought it would be funny I assume.
^at some point we had diamonds in the end zone too. i just can't find a pic on the web. but i have seen it.
Look again. Isn't the checkerboard a UT thing?
Which makes it just 44 years after Tennessee. It's a Tennessee thing we co-opted anyways because Nike wanted us to, the same reason we used to wear terrible basketball jerseys on the football field, Nike thought it would be funny I assume.
I'm with ya Brock! I just opened this thread (uniform and logo discussions don't do much for me). I was stunned at the passion in this logo discussion. Hell, I have no idea what the Houston and Buffalo logos look like and I could not care less.Never seen a bunch of grown men get so upset over a logo, lol. We have bigger issues to be concerned about.