ADVERTISEMENT

Mcdaniels isn’t a make or break player imo

While McDaniels in and of himself isnt key, anybody thinking we dont need him is kidding themselves. Hagans, Maxey and Quickley will be good guards. Juzang, Whitney and Brooks will likely be a good combination at forwards, and providing EJ and Nick come back, we will have a good team. With the right breaks and matchups, we could win a title. But with that team, we would need the right breaks and matchups.

Hagans should be better, but he wont dominate his position. Maxey should be really good, but again probably wont be elite. Quickley should be better, but again wont be elite or great. All the forwards are good, but have glaring weaknesses, Juzang (handling and facilitating), Whitney (shooting), and Brooks (think slightly better Gabriel). EJ has a chance to be a star, and hope that he does, but it will require him to gain a fair amount of skill and determination. Nick should again show improvement and handle his own in a backup role. I dont see a player with the skillset to become a takeover type player, something that is needed if you dont want a tournament game left to chance. Blackshear isnt that guy either. McDaniels might not be that guy, but he has the skillset to do it. Hampton has the skillset to do it. Ideally you get one of those 2 and they become that player. Otherwise we will be good but need breaks to win a title.

Don’t forget Sestina he will be in the mix. His impact is unknown but he looks like he can be a solid contributor which is all we would get from mcdaniels in one year.
 
McDaniels gives us length on perimeter,shot making, weak side shotblocking, he can rebound and take ball up the court. Cal would make him the number 1 pick, thats why Cal needs him. Need to be ever present in the minds of new recruits.

Some of our fans don't get that. They think Cal can still point to an irrelevant MKG when it comes to recruiting elite wing forwards. You only get so much mileage out of Kevin Knox. We need to land some elite wings. Whitney is a good start, but having Whitney and Jaden on the roster changes the momentum in exponential ways.
 
Don’t forget Sestina he will be in the mix. His impact is unknown but he looks like he can be a solid contributor which is all we would get from mcdaniels in one year.

But Sestina's ceiling has already been measured. It won't go higher. He is what he is.

Meanwhile Jaden is a potential top 3 pick. He's a kid who could give you 16-18/game by April 2020.

How you're even daring to compare the potential impact of these two looks like nothing less than deflection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cats192
While McDaniels in and of himself isnt key, anybody thinking we dont need him is kidding themselves. Hagans, Maxey and Quickley will be good guards. Juzang, Whitney and Brooks will likely be a good combination at forwards, and providing EJ and Nick come back, we will have a good team. With the right breaks and matchups, we could win a title. But with that team, we would need the right breaks and matchups.

Hagans should be better, but he wont dominate his position. Maxey should be really good, but again probably wont be elite. Quickley should be better, but again wont be elite or great. All the forwards are good, but have glaring weaknesses, Juzang (handling and facilitating), Whitney (shooting), and Brooks (think slightly better Gabriel). EJ has a chance to be a star, and hope that he does, but it will require him to gain a fair amount of skill and determination. Nick should again show improvement and handle his own in a backup role. I dont see a player with the skillset to become a takeover type player, something that is needed if you dont want a tournament game left to chance. Blackshear isnt that guy either. McDaniels might not be that guy, but he has the skillset to do it. Hampton has the skillset to do it. Ideally you get one of those 2 and they become that player. Otherwise we will be good but need breaks to win a title.


The exact same points that you pointed out for all the other players can be said for Jaden. Why is he different? You think he doesnt have weaknesses? Dont look at solely the rankings and assume that this kid is going to be the savior. He has weaknesses just like everyone else. How many freshman do you see dominate the Final Four?? Once in a generation talents, thats it. Is Jaden one of those talents? Who know but Id say not. Blackshear averaged 15 PPG and 20 PPG over the last month in conference play. How many freshman bumps their average by 5 PPG in conference play? Not many. Don't get caught up in the rankings and look at the product. Not knocking JM because I would absolutely love to have the kid but Blackshear is a great proven college player. Does not have the upside of JM but who gives us more in the 1 year? Who helps us hang a banner?? Our sesson is not hanging on this decision.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CrazyCat74
Daniels is important and dont kid yourself. We just cant keep striking out on kids. If EJ doesn’t come back and Blackshear stays in draft we will not be a championship caliber team. This board is pathetic. If we sign a play ranked 25th he is a stud. We lose a top 10 play and he was no good. We were told last year that Zion was fat and slow.



And of course you believe them. :)
 
Like clockwork.

We think we’re getting a kid—OMG WE’’RE GONNA BE SO GOOD!”

We think we’re not—“he doesnt matter.”

Yep, and suddenly "top 5 picks are only good based on potential."

"We're going to be fine."

"We already have more than enough talent."

"Scottie Lewis dominated McDaniels in one game so he was overrated anyway."

Remember the fans who tried to make a case for Baker being elite because he had a good game against the Ball brothers? It's the same kind of thought process now regarding Jaden's one bad game, but now they're conveniently reversing it to make the potential Washington commit look inferior against a pair top 10 recruits. [laughing]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cats192
By what standard would we be "fine?" You seem to enjoy being in the pack as opposed to being the frontrunner. Jaden is a top 5 pick. Why downplay that?

We haven't been to a Final Four since '15 mainly because we've missed out on one critical piece to the roster on each of those teams. Did you think those teams would be "fine?"

Bet you did, huh?



I don't think last year was a missing piece as much as we had injuries to those in important positions that caused us to lose the continuity of team play. There have been years for sure but even the year before, losing Vanderbilt and Baker for almost all season didn't help our cause in the tournament.
 
Would be nice to get Blackshear & Hampton. If Jaden wants on then tell him sorry no room.
 
While McDaniels in and of himself isnt key, anybody thinking we dont need him is kidding themselves. Hagans, Maxey and Quickley will be good guards. Juzang, Whitney and Brooks will likely be a good combination at forwards, and providing EJ and Nick come back, we will have a good team. With the right breaks and matchups, we could win a title. But with that team, we would need the right breaks and matchups.

Hagans should be better, but he wont dominate his position. Maxey should be really good, but again probably wont be elite. Quickley should be better, but again wont be elite or great. All the forwards are good, but have glaring weaknesses, Juzang (handling and facilitating), Whitney (shooting), and Brooks (think slightly better Gabriel). EJ has a chance to be a star, and hope that he does, but it will require him to gain a fair amount of skill and determination. Nick should again show improvement and handle his own in a backup role. I dont see a player with the skillset to become a takeover type player, something that is needed if you dont want a tournament game left to chance. Blackshear isnt that guy either. McDaniels might not be that guy, but he has the skillset to do it. Hampton has the skillset to do it. Ideally you get one of those 2 and they become that player. Otherwise we will be good but need breaks to win a title.

You grossly underestimate how good Maxey is.
 
Favorites don't mean squat. How many times do the favorites in May win the tournament? I'm just sayin....

In a field of 64, the favorite won't win more often than not.

But so many times we've come up just short. If you've got a roster of overwhelming talent, you're going to get to the final 4 more often than not. We haven't had that loaded roster since 2015. I think Mcdaniels is the difference in another 2018/2019 team--where you're really good and will be in a position to maybe make the Final 4--and 2015 where you're getting to the Final 4--and you're maybe winning it all.
 
You grossly underestimate how good Maxey is.

Yeah we grossly understimate how everyone is. And then we're livid when they aren't superstars 6 weeks into the season.

I think he'll be really good, but how many of these kids have taken time to find themselves in the college game? It's always funny when people make the "You don't understand how good player x is" post in the off-season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CalipariCapo
The exact same points that you pointed out for all the other players can be said for Jaden. Why is he different? You think he doesnt have weaknesses? Dont look at solely the rankings and assume that this kid is going to be the savior. He has weaknesses just like everyone else. How many freshman do you see dominate the Final Four?? Once in a generation talents, thats it. Is Jaden one of those talents? Who know but Id say not. Blackshear averaged 15 PPG and 20 PPG over the last month in conference play. How many freshman bumps their average by 5 PPG in conference play? Not many. Don't get caught up in the rankings and look at the product. Not knocking JM because I would absolutely love to have the kid but Blackshear is a great proven college player. Does not have the upside of JM but who gives us more in the 1 year? Who helps us hang a banner?? Our sesson is not hanging on this decision.

I thought I was clear about what I said. Jaden does have weaknesses, but in my opinion, those weaknesses are easier to overcome for Cal than the weaknesses of some of the others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKCATSFREAK
But Sestina's ceiling has already been measured. It won't go higher. He is what he is.
63-BFEEFF-061-D-4-F96-8-B20-584160-F3-E3-E2.jpg
 
I thought I was clear about what I said. Jaden does have weaknesses, but in my opinion, those weaknesses are easier to overcome for Cal than the weaknesses of some of the others.


I see your point. I just dont think Jaden is make or break. We have TONS of talent and we have other options outside of JM. Thats all but I definitely see your point.
 
Yep, and suddenly "top 5 picks are only good based on potential."

"We're going to be fine."

"We already have more than enough talent."

"Scottie Lewis dominated McDaniels in one game so he was overrated anyway."

Remember the fans who tried to make a case for Baker being elite because he had a good game against the Ball brothers? It's the same kind of thought process now regarding Jaden's one bad game, but now they're conveniently reversing it to make the potential Washington commit look inferior against a pair top 10 recruits. [laughing]


We will be fine Saul. We will have other options if we goes to UW. Our season does not hang in the balance of this decision. Yes, we do have enough talent to win the championship, barring an exit from EJ and Nick. Do I want JM? Will he definitely help us? Hell yeah and Im gonna jump for joy if we get him. But we will be ok. Cal will put together a team that is capable of winning a championship regardless of what JM does. We will be ok


I think its a case of some being over confident in him and some being in denial of how good he can be. Its a mix of both in my opinion. But we will always be ok. I trust Cal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Son_Of_Saul
IF you are referring to me, you really should go back and read my posts. Ive consistently said the exact say thing about Jaden.

I don't think we're loaded offensively yet. The 2015 team four guys who could create offense for themselves: twins, Towns, and Lyles. Booker was so hit or miss by season's end that I can't place him in that group. Having four guys to fill that role is huge.

You need guys who can create offense consistently on their own when the halfcourt sets break down. Right now, we have Maxey/Whitney to fill that category. You could probably reasonably count on at least one more to break out from the Hagans/IQ/Juzang/Brooks/Sestina group.

McDaniels would give you that fourth high level piece. We could use another guy to make it work in the half court when the offense is struggling.
 
Yeah we grossly understimate how everyone is. And then we're livid when they aren't superstars 6 weeks into the season.

I think he'll be really good, but how many of these kids have taken time to find themselves in the college game? It's always funny when people make the "You don't understand how good player x is" post in the off-season.

You're mistaken. I'm not saying Maxey will be a combo of James Harden, Russel Westbrook, and Jesus. But he's one of the best guards coming into college this year. We're a loaded squad so he wont have to put up Jamal Murray or Malik Monk type numbers, so dont be fooled by his inevitably pedestrian numbers. Maxey is probably the best player on our team, easily top 2 or 3 and that's saying something on a squad of almost 10 players previously ranked 5 stars.

The problem everyone has is making every player the best player ever and then getting pissed they average 9ppg as opposed to 23ppg. Maxey, to me, is the 2nd coming of Knight. Hes incredibly strong for his height, he's got an incredible IQ and has an infectious personality that makes his teammates want to kick into that next gear. He's the epitome of a true floor general. His shooting is very good and with Hagans as a sophomore, he wont have the pressure to be THE man. As sure as I was that Davis, Wall, Knight, Murray, Monk, Fox, would kill it in college, so will Maxey. Recruting analysts cant get enough of him. He doesnt have the flash of a Cole Anthony, but he's got the skills necessary to be considered elite. He will be no less than 10ppg, 3-4 assists and probably ~38% from 3 and on our team, that'll be very good numbers. Anyone trying to do the opposite and go "he'll be alright, but not elite" is underestimating him which is just as silly as over estimating.
 
But Sestina's ceiling has already been measured. It won't go higher. He is what he is.

Meanwhile Jaden is a potential top 3 pick. He's a kid who could give you 16-18/game by April 2020.

How you're even daring to compare the potential impact of these two looks like nothing less than deflection.


I’m genuinely curious to see a mock draft with McDaniels as top 3? Much less top 5 ?

Or is it more he has the potential to go top 3?

NBAdraft.net has him @14 https://www.nbadraft.net/2020mock_draft

ESPN newest mock has him at 7
 
But Sestina's ceiling has already been measured. It won't go higher. He is what he is.

Meanwhile Jaden is a potential top 3 pick. He's a kid who could give you 16-18/game by April 2020.

How you're even daring to compare the potential impact of these two looks like nothing less than deflection.

Agreed.

The only thing I question is whether McDaniels is able to get to that level by the end of his Freshmen year.

He may end up barely scratching the surface and then getting drafted on "potential" in the lottery in June '20.

But if Cal can get him, we know what Cal can do with a kid in one year.
 
I don't think we're loaded offensively yet. The 2015 team four guys who could create offense for themselves: twins, Towns, and Lyles. Booker was so hit or miss by season's end that I can't place him in that group. Having four guys to fill that role is huge.

You need guys who can create offense consistently on their own when the halfcourt sets break down. Right now, we have Maxey/Whitney to fill that category. You could probably reasonably count on at least one more to break out from the Hagans/IQ/Juzang/Brooks/Sestina group.

McDaniels would give you that fourth high level piece. We could use another guy to make it work in the half court when the offense is struggling.


Definitely can see that point. Well said!
 
we have keion brooks, Whitney and even Montgomery who can do what he can similar frame and all. Blackshear on the other hand is a make or break player for a team lacking what he brings. I don’t think he ends up in the draft and would hate for mcdaniels to force him elsewhere
Brooks and Whitney are different players with different skill sets. McDaniels is also a different player with a different frame and skill set. None of them have ever played in a college game. Montgomery, if he returns, is more valuable to Calipari for next year than these others. Some fans will be made crazy by that statement, but it is very true. For 1 thing, Montgomery is the only true baseline player of the bunch. For another, Montgomery is the only player of the bunch with college playing experience. And let’s not forget that Montgomery in his own right was a legitimate national top 10-12 recruit on everyone’s lists, with his own elite skill set. I do not know what McDaniels will decide. I think Calipari is exactly the coach McDaniels needs to develop his game, and I hope McDaniels finds the courage to sign here. But UK will be a top 5 team with or without McDaniels, as long as Montgomery returns.
 
But Sestina's ceiling has already been measured. It won't go higher. He is what he is.

Meanwhile Jaden is a potential top 3 pick. He's a kid who could give you 16-18/game by April 2020.

How you're even daring to compare the potential impact of these two looks like nothing less than deflection.

What if we compare floors? What is the expected level of production for players of his recruiting ranking? The production of our guys last season can be a good example. Montgomery, Hagans, and Keldon were all ranked in about the same range, 7-15, as McDaniels. Keldon turned out to be a solid contributor, but not a star. Montgomery was one of the worst players on the team and Hagans had his warts.

Let's go back another year the class of 2017. Knox was rather meh, not a star caliber player. I wouldn't rate him better than KJ. Hami was a bust. PJ was a late bloomer and took until his sophomore year to reach star level. Vanderbilt couldn't play.

And if you keep going back, you'll see it's a mixed bag of results in that 7-15 range. Some years, they are all great, like in the Bam-Fox-Monk class while others are like the 2017 and 2018 class. The only real sure things are in the top 5 or 6 with the only bust being Skal and the rest being stars. Maybe we'll get Monk or Bam, or maybe we'll get James Young. It's hard to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Son_Of_Saul
Jaden is closer to EJ Montgomery than MKG. I want the kid but if your expectation is a kid that’s more than a role player, I think you’re mistaken. Rather he comes here or not.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT