Yep.Our depth should run other teams into the ground, making our offense easier to get better shots..
If they sign a 15th guy, I doubt he plays much. I really think he will hold it unless he finds someone with potential willing to come in and redshirt. But I could be wrong. I didn’t think we had a shot at getting Hawthorne.Too early to predict 3 point shooting for me.
I think the team will be fine.
As far as the last post, Aberdeen, Johnson and Chandler likely fill the backup slot at point.
Don't know if he'll be better but I feel many are underestimating him. It's mostly a wait and see on how our offense will be but I don't expect we'll be as strong an outside threat as last season. Defense will be much stronger and that could more than offset lack of shooting comparison.Chandler will be better than Brea.
This! Also, Pope’s offense makes for much better shot selection, thus I can see several guys will have their shooting numbers go up in his system. Not really worried about the offense. Our defense will be noticeably better.It’s a TBD.
Nobody knows until the games are played. For example, we all thought Butler was a bricklayer and he shot the 3 better than he ever has in his one year at UK.
On paper, we have less outside shooting than last year. But, the games aren’t played on paper.
Story is saying the Cats won't have the offensive prowess we had last year.
He thinks the loss of Jackson and Brea, especially Brea will or could be a fairly major concern.
Thoughts on his take?
There is no one factor that determines success or failure on the basketball court. This team won’t shoot it as well as the past two did. Hard to argue that. Interesting to see if/how Pope adjust the Zoom stuff to this mix of essentially non-shooters.This whole "Kentucky won't shoot the 3 as well" trope is overblown, in my opinion, especially when Quaintance starts playing. The Cats will have more inside scoring threat, and more guys who can attack the basket off the dribble. That should create even better looks on the perimeter for shooters in Pope's offense, and guys like Lowe and others will raise their averages -- Williams already shot within two percent of what Brea shot.
I'd bet $100 Kentucky as a team shoots within two percent of the same percentage as last year - either higher or lower.
By the way, the Reed Sheppard, Rob Dillingham, Antonio Reeves team shot 3 percent HIGHER than last year, set a UK record for 3-point percentage - and lost to Oakland in the first round. So it is far from the factor that determines success or failure anyway.
Pretty bad take. Borderline stupid, honestly.Story is saying the Cats won't have the offensive prowess we had last year.
He thinks the loss of Jackson and Brea, especially Brea will or could be a fairly major concern.
Thoughts on his take?
There is no reduction in fire power.The reduction in firepower is incredibly obvious and anyone who’s been paying attention has been talking about it for a long time.
More depth, more athleticism, better ball handling, more toughness, better defense, better rebounding. A little less experience but still veteran. Sure, no Brea level shooter, but I see us having equal shooting to the rest of last year's team. Offense will still be top 20, defense can be as well.We have more depth and better defense. A slight hit in offense isn't going to be the difference.
What are you blind? It's published 3pt % stats.There is no reduction in fire power.
There’s more to offense than just three-point percentage. Based on stats, Kentucky will likely shoot 34-36% from three this season, only a slight drop from 37.4% last year. With improvements across the board, the team should generate more open looks, making it very possible to match or exceed last season's 3PT%.What are you blind? It's published 3pt % stats.
There is no reduction in fire power.
What are you blind? It's published 3pt % stats.
All in my original comment in this thread. The one you quoted while clearly not having read it (because I'm gonna give you more credit than assume you actually read my comment that you replied to and still misunderstood it that badly). I just explained it better.There’s more to offense than just three-point percentage. Based on stats, Kentucky will likely shoot 34-36% from three this season, only a slight drop from 37.4% last year. With improvements across the board, the team should generate more open looks, making it very possible to match or exceed last season's 3PT%.
This was all in my original comment too. But I appreciate you being genteel about it.IMO, it depends on perspective. We don't have two 3-point shooters like Brea and Robinson anymore, notwithstanding that Jasper, Aberdeen, and Williams might be solid from deep. But we have a whole lot more scoring versatility now.
Prior to last season, there was so much talk about 3-point shooting that some people may have gotten the idea 3-point shooting was going to be the foundation of Pope's offense. Then Pope himself started talking about shooting >30 threes a game. But when we got to the meat of the season, our offense didn't shoot anywhere near 30 threes a game. Motion and cutting became focuses during the grind of the schedule.
In truth, we didn't have the personnel to score much in the lane last year. Amari and Carr are huge, but not particularly skilled scorers on the low block. Amari's game is mainly rebounding and defense. Carr is skinny and gets shoved around. Actually, our best baseline scorer was probably Oweh.
This time, though, our team is deeper, stronger, and more athletic. Maybe we don't have guys who will drain half of their 3-point attempts. But we have guys who can score at all three levels and also defend SEC athletes. It's a bigger and more balanced team that can score every way there is to score on a basketball court. And this team won't get beat by opponents' offensive rebounds. This is just a better team up and down from 1-13 (or 14).
If that's true, you buried the lead. This is a message board, not your fevered blog.All in my original comment in this thread. The one you quoted while clearly not having read it (because I'm gonna give you more credit than assume you actually read my comment that you replied to and still misunderstood it that badly). I just explained it better.
Go **** yourself.You're a dumbass complaining that your dumbass response to what I wrote was justified because my thoughts were more than one sentence.
I'll take that under advisement. 👌
My take is that his "take" is no more valid than the next. His job is to bloviate and that is what he is doing. Believe it or not ... we will just have to wait and watch it all play out. I trust CMP over Story.Story is saying the Cats won't have the offensive prowess we had last year.
He thinks the loss of Jackson and Brea, especially Brea will or could be a fairly major concern.
Thoughts on his take?