Easy to tell he is really excited for new O line coach & OC. Threw some deserved shade at former O line coach, "look who we had (last yr), *I* coulda coached them!!".
He’s gonna have to. We’re gonna lose some people too I imagine.Coach say anything about taking more transfers after spring ball?
I think you misunderstood Stoops. The way I took it he was saying he had 3 future pros in their last year going to the pros. Think he way complementing the players as they were so old and good they basically didn’t need much coaching. Didn’t feel he was throwing shade at Woodward.
Easy to tell he is really excited for new O line coach & OC. Threw some deserved shade at former O line coach, "look who we had (last yr), *I* coulda coached them!!".
agree, but I think you meant Wolford.I think you misunderstood Stoops. The way I took it he was saying he had 3 future pros in their last year going to the pros. Think he way complementing the players as they were so old and good they basically didn’t need much coaching. Didn’t feel he was throwing shade at Woodward.
I know many were upset the way Wolford left, I get it. But the guy is getting ready to put 3 guys in the NFL...that's pretty good.Man. Very excited for next season. Think we upgraded the o line coach and don't think we downgraded oc with a potential upgrade.
Also. We should be able to get some NASTY running backs with these guys. Just show them deebo and say this could be you.
I've had thoughts adding the same line after reading some stuff out of San Francisco about Scangarello. Everyone is happy he's leaving and that's never good.I think yenser is a home run. The oc I'll reserve judgment. I think he's a very capable coach but his personality is clearly not able to connect like coen.
Mike stoops is just a disappointing addition. Said that for awhile but didn't see anything yet to change my mind.
I'm curious as to what knowledge of football assistant coaching abilities you have, that would give you the confidence to call someone a home run or a disappointment, before they have done anything concrete that you would have access to? I also can't get over the fact that you said Mike Stoops was a disappointment when he was hired, just before the dead period I might add, and that he hasn't done anything to change your mind. I'm pretty sure you stated that unironically, which puts quite a bit here to unpack in just a four sentence post. I encourage everyone to read their posts aloud before hitting send, so we don't have to spend so much time dissecting less than coherent messages.I think yenser is a home run. The oc I'll reserve judgment. I think he's a very capable coach but his personality is clearly not able to connect like coen.
Mike stoops is just a disappointing addition. Said that for awhile but didn't see anything yet to change my mind.
I'm curious as to what knowledge of football assistant coaching abilities you have, that would give you the confidence to call someone a home run or a disappointment, before they have done anything concrete that you would have access to? I also can't get over the fact that you said Mike Stoops was a disappointment when he was hired, just before the dead period I might add, and that he hasn't done anything to change your mind. I'm pretty sure you stated that unironically, which puts quite a bit here to unpack in just a four sentence post. I encourage everyone to read their posts aloud before hitting send, so we don't have to spend so much time dissecting less than coherent messages.
I just copied and pasted a past post to someone apparently from your neck of the metaphorical woods, but it's suitable for you and BigBlueInsanity apparently. There aren't many who post here who have the qualifications to analyze this hire as a home run or otherwise, but if you allow social media posts by complete strangers to sway your opinions of people's professional abilities before you've had a chance to see them work, then that must be the most intellectually lazy thing I can think of. Stoops has more knowledge than any of us and has earned our trust to hire the right people, but that bother me less than the thought that you might be so easily swayed in other areas of life.I've had thoughts adding the same line after reading some stuff out of San Francisco about Scangarello. Everyone is happy he's leaving and that's never good.
Anyone who forms their opinion form anonymous, uniformed, sour grapes social media posts gets a 1/10 from me, in any context.Bluegrass79 said:
Score of the hire is 5 of 10. I've read and heard about 49er coaches and people not caring at this guy's gone. They didn't even like him. And he's had some bad seasons and been fired at other places. I'm sorry they could have did better and I don't have a lot of faith in this guy. The hire is blah
I didn't say don't post. I wish there were more people posting. I'm just calling out BS when I see people forming inaccurate, unreasonable or unsupported opinions. I'd love to see you support how Mike Stoops' track record is lackluster. He's coached for around 30 years, been a P5 HC and has personally coached in more bowl games than UK, as a school, has played in. I will provide a link below with a long list of accolades, but what makes your comment absurd, is that with this guys exceptional resume, he's taken the inside LB coaching role at UK. I'd be willing to bet a large sum of money that he is both the most experience inside LB coach in UK history and probably the most experienced Inside LB coach currently coaching in D1.It's a message board. If only experts and insiders posted, we'd all just be reading rockcats posts.
Mike stoops has this far a very lackluster track record. If his last name was Smith, he'd never gotten this job. He's fine but we could've done better. We should've done better because we lost two major recruiters the last two years and are yet to fill their void.
He was for a couple of years, the first time we tried to hire him for sure. I thought I read he took the DC job at FIU or FAU before UK hired him this time.Elliott was awful and proved as much over time. Brumbaugh was fine but Stewart is better.
Iirc Mike was a bama analyst when we hired him. Not a DC. He never kept a DC job iirc
Iirc Google is a viable place to see that Mike Stoops in fact has been a DC
Way to be an asshole man. I didn't say I'd formed any opinion. And what's it to you? How bout you not quote me anymore with your insults?I just copied and pasted a past post to someone apparently from your neck of the metaphorical woods, but it's suitable for you and BigBlueInsanity apparently. There aren't many who post here who have the qualifications to analyze this hire as a home run or otherwise, but if you allow social media posts by complete strangers to sway your opinions of people's professional abilities before you've had a chance to see them work, then that must be the most intellectually lazy thing I can think of. Stoops has more knowledge than any of us and has earned our trust to hire the right people, but that bother me less than the thought that you might be so easily swayed in other areas of life.
Anyone who forms their opinion form anonymous, uniformed, sour grapes social media posts gets a 1/10 from me, in any context.
You literally agreed with someone insulting our new coach and he was quoting anonymous message board posters as his reason and you have the nerve to ask me not to insult you? lol This message board is an irony party. How about you don't insult others who aren't here to refute the BS posts? If you have an opinion that you can back up with facts, then have at it, but if you post BS with nothing to support except I read some ignorant fan's post somewhere, then be prepared to defend yourself.Way to be an asshole man. I didn't say I'd formed any opinion. And what's it to you? How bout you not quote me anymore with your insults?
Do you know how to read? I mean actually comprehend what is written? I don't think so. You blew up at me for no reason. I didn't say a negative thing about Scangarello. I said a large portion of the San Francisco media seemed happy he left. That gives me pause. It should anyone. I'll judge slowly on the hire. That's all I said. Learn to read tough guy. Literally all I said was it's concerning to see people from his last job be happy he left his last job. So that's not concerning to you? If it isn't you're being foolish.You literally agreed with someone insulting our new coach and he was quoting anonymous message board posters as his reason and you have the nerve to ask me not to insult you? lol This message board is an irony party. How about you don't insult others who aren't here to refute the BS posts? If you have an opinion that you can back up with facts, then have at it, but if you post BS with nothing to support except I read some ignorant fan's post somewhere, then be prepared to defend yourself.
I know how to read well. You agreed with someone who had been siting message board comments and you never mentioned media. Here is what you posted: "I've had thoughts adding the same line after reading some stuff out of San Francisco about Scangarello. Everyone is happy he's leaving and that's never good." You said everyone is happy he is leaving. Then I went to NFL.com to find out he is "a highly respected quarterback developer". You can't expect reader of your posts to read your mind, so if you post something that can easily be proven to be incorrect, especially when you don't site any factual content or provide a link, and can't take the blowback, then don't post unsubstantiated opinions. Here's a link from a NFL analyst refuting what you claim: https://www.nfl.com/videos/pelisser...ring-former-49ers-qb-coach-rich-scangarello-aDo you know how to read? I mean actually comprehend what is written? I don't think so. You blew up at me for no reason. I didn't say a negative thing about Scangarello. I said a large portion of the San Francisco media seemed happy he left. That gives me pause. It should anyone. I'll judge slowly on the hire. That's all I said. Learn to read tough guy. Literally all I said was it's concerning to see people from his last job be happy he left his last job. So that's not concerning to you? If it isn't you're being foolish.
No 3rd grade level. If you're going to try to pick nits like that you'll have an aneurysm on this board. Go try and lecture someone else. I read a lot of things at the time and several Frisco people laughed at the highly respected quarterback developer thing you mention. I didn't make up anything. Go do some more research bookbag.I know how to read well. You agreed with someone who had been siting message board comments and you never mentioned media. Here is what you posted: "I've had thoughts adding the same line after reading some stuff out of San Francisco about Scangarello. Everyone is happy he's leaving and that's never good." You said everyone is happy he is leaving. Then I went to NFL.com to find out he is "a highly respected quarterback developer". You can't expect reader of your posts to read your mind, so if you post something that can easily be proven to be incorrect, especially when you don't site any factual content or provide a link, and can't take the blowback, then don't post unsubstantiated opinions. Here's a link from a NFL analyst refuting what you claim: https://www.nfl.com/videos/pelisser...ring-former-49ers-qb-coach-rich-scangarello-a
I have no problem with differing opinions. I have problems with people making up negative info without providing substantive information to back it up.