I was thinking the same thing. Which is worse, losing to us by 27 or losing to mizzou?
South Carolina is just a bad team. Only thing they've done all year is beat an A&M team which used smoke n mirrors to dupe pollsters into thinking THEY were good...for about 10 min.
Sounds like they would fit in well with the Big 12South Carolina is just a bad team. Only thing they've done all year is beat an A&M team which used smoke n mirrors to dupe pollsters into thinking THEY were good...for about 10 min.
Yep. Beat that overrated Big 12 team (redundant) and people assumed that A&M was legit.South Carolina is just a bad team. Only thing they've done all year is beat an A&M team which used smoke n mirrors to dupe pollsters into thinking THEY were good...for about 10 min.
Listen. You're the one who jumped into this thread talking about how overrated A&M was in spite of the fact that they had just beaten one of the best teams in the Big 12.So...you guys honestly think the SEC is better than the Big 12?
No, but there's not a huge difference in the 2 leagues...So...you guys honestly think the SEC is better than the Big 12?
Walk your chalk back to the rock from which you were under.So...you guys honestly think the SEC is better than the Big 12?
Listen. You're the one who jumped into this thread talking about how overrated A&M was in spite of the fact that they had just beaten one of the best teams in the Big 12.
So...you guys honestly think the SEC is better than the Big 12?
Overall, about the same. You do realize that pretty much every year the media pumps sunshine into the idea of the all powerful B12, only to have almost all of their tourney teams gone in the 1st round. Same will be true this year.So...you guys honestly think the SEC is better than the Big 12?
I was thinking the same thing. Which is worse, losing to us by 27 or losing to mizzou?