Let this photo serve as an olive branch extended to unite the BBN

[Aike]

I'm not getting it through the search function either, but I know he posted last night, unless someone quoted him and I am thinking that was him posting.
But nevertheless, even if he didn't, that's one guy out of the, apparently, huge group of "idiots" that are being called out for not showing up to eat their crow.
The people busy trying to call people out are just as bad as the so called "idiots".

Believe what you want, but several of these people have been overbearing for weeks, if not downright mean and nasty.

It wasn't a matter of making a bad guess. It's been one long-winded, negative agenda for many. They deserve to be reminded of it, if they show their faces.

 

[morgousky]

I personally have no issues with haters being called to the floor, or even some fans that went personal. I don't necessarily care if they do go personal, these guys would ignore it anyway. That's just the way it is, but I don't have a problem with others that do care expressing their outrage.

However, "overly negative" or "agenda driven" is purely subjective and it's against board rules to go at them by name. What's negative to one might be common sense to the other. And let's be honest, there's some really good posters here who wouldn't allow criticism of any kind toward Cal, these players, or our system. They aren't allowed to define what's acceptable and what's not.

Fans provide checks and balances. Hashing some of these things out is a good thing.

 

[kyjeff1]

Believe what you want, but several of these people have been overbearing for weeks, if not downright mean and nasty.

It wasn't a matter of making a bad guess. It's been one long-winded, negative agenda for many. They deserve to be reminded of it, if they show their faces.

I don't doubt that, they have been nasty to the kid, but there are some that are also very annoying with their stance too. How many times have you read comments from the other side calling them idiots because they have an opinion? Keyboard Cowboys. That's just as uncalled for as what Cotton and Kyups was doing. The op of this thread wasn't much better.

 

[Aike]

I personally have no issues with haters being called to the floor, or even some fans that went personal. I don't necessarily care if they do go personal, these guys would ignore it anyway. That's just the way it is, but I don't have a problem with others that do care expressing their outrage.

However, "overly negative" or "agenda driven" is purely subjective and it's against board rules to go at them by name. What's negative to one might be common sense to the other. And let's be honest, there's some really good posters here who wouldn't allow criticism of any kind toward Cal, these players, or our system. They aren't allowed to define what's acceptable and what's not.

Fans provide checks and balances. Hashing some of these things out is a good thing.

I'm going to have to go ahead and laugh at "against board rules." If some of these posters haven't been violating board rules with nearly every post, then I'm not sure why there would be any rules at all.

 

[morgousky]

I'm going to have to go ahead and laugh at "against board rules." If some of these posters haven't been violating board rules with nearly every post, then I'm not sure why there would be any rules at all.

Well it was useful for my argument so I used it.

 

[BengalWACO]

I am FIRED UP he is returning. If you are not, then I don't feel you want what is best for this team and its players.