Great. Not worried about missing his offense but desperately need him to contain Sears.
These new designations are kind of ridiculously arbitrary.
Questionable is listed as 50% likely to play. How do you differentiate that from doubtful which is 25% likely?
Carr was listed as questionable two games ago and played well, maybe 4 minutes less.
Not really sure how scientific this whole injury report thing is. I’m not a sports gambler but I guess that’s why they started this?
It will be free flowing as you stated, but it won't be because of Butler. The ball dies in his hands. He has yet to consistently drive and kick it out, and the Alabama game is not the game to practice it. Great defender, though!You can say you won’t miss his offense but in a game as free-flowing as this is shaping up to be, the pace will be very hard on us if we don’t have his downhill drives to the basket. I sure hope this is Pope taking advantage of a bruise-based gray area in the rules to mess with Nate Oats’ head.
I'd be curious to see an NCAA-wide analysis after the season of how often guys played when they were probable, questionable, doubtful. By rule it's 75%, 50%, 25%. But I would wager it'll end up being 95%, 75%, 10%.In the NBA, it seems to be pretty much as you said. Some teams will just throw anyone even a little banged up onto the Questionable list. I feel like doubtful might as well be a 5% chance in the NBA. Guys that are doubtful almost never play barring something miraculous happening.