Oklahoma? UNCheat? Kansas? Michigan State? Maryland?
Once again, a year off.
While that's true, stats like the one below tell me there is probably more validity to it this season:I feel like we say this every year.
While that's true, stats like the one below tell me there is probably more validity to it this season:
1983 btw is the year unranked North Carolina State won it all as a #6 seed.While that's true, stats like the one below tell me there is probably more validity to it this season:
I noticed that too. Then I started looking at the years with 6 different #1s, thinking there would be some sort of trend with relatively lower seeds winning it all but it looks like all 1 or 2 seeds won it all those years. So who knows.1983 btw is the year unranked North Carolina State won it all as a #6 seed.
I would put money that it will be above 7, by the end of the yearWhile that's true, stats like the one below tell me there is probably more validity to it this season:
Until they got to the final four/championship weekend and choked against an inferior opponent.Oklahoma? UNCheat? Kansas? Michigan State? Maryland?
Once again, a year off.
It is obviously hyperbole, but you guys playing down last year's team because "they had some close calls" are either too literal or you don't understand basketball history.
Every team ever has had some close calls, even the ones that went undefeated. The truth is '15 had fewer close calls than all but maybe a dozen teams in CBB history. They had a win margin of around 22, against a perfectly respectable schedule. Do some of you understand how rare that is?
Oklahoma? UNCheat? Kansas? Michigan State? Maryland?
Once again, a year off.