ADVERTISEMENT

KY flood damage

Don't these floods happen over & over in our towns built in river & creek gorges? Seems like it.
 
What can be done for Eastern Ky to prevent the damage from these recurring floods? Dredging the river to increase the capacity of the river seems like an obvious solution and it would seem that the cost would be offset by the savings from flood damage.
 
Here in Hart County a mother and 7 year old daughter perished when their car was swept away. The Green River at Munfordville is expected to crest today at 45 feet which I believe would beat the 1997 flooding mark.
 
What can be done for Eastern Ky to prevent the damage from these recurring floods? Dredging the river to increase the capacity of the river seems like an obvious solution and it would seem that the cost would be offset by the savings from flood damage.
It would also help to reclaim/excavate more area adjacent to creeks for storage. Yes, dredging helps too, or just general maintenance on the main channel. Try to reclaim land, and people start screaming about government overreach. In a lot of cases, government regulations will keep maintenance from occurring because they don't want the natural channel disturbed. But most any small creek is going to have fallen trees blocking the channel and stuff like that which hinders the flow and raises the water surface during a bad storm.

But the bottom line is, to develop standards to meet the kinds of storms we get now would require a lot of people to give up their land to an expanded regulatory floodplain. FEMA administers the floodplain, and I don't see Trump, a real estate developer, on the side of setting aside more land as undevelopable floodplain area. I hope I'm wrong about that. He should at least understand the issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill - Shy Cat
It would also help to reclaim/excavate more area adjacent to creeks for storage. Yes, dredging helps too, or just general maintenance on the main channel. Try to reclaim land, and people start screaming about government overreach. In a lot of cases, government regulations will keep maintenance from occurring because they don't want the natural channel disturbed. But most any small creek is going to have fallen trees blocking the channel and stuff like that which hinders the flow and raises the water surface during a bad storm.

But the bottom line is, to develop standards to meet the kinds of storms we get now would require a lot of people to give up their land to an expanded regulatory floodplain. FEMA administers the regulatory floodplain, and I don't see Trump, a real estate developer, on the side of setting aside more land as undevelopable floodplain area. I hope I'm wrong about that. He should at least understand the issue.
Thanks for this great explantion. Regarding Trump, we’ve had these devastating floods for decades. Not sure why previous political figures haven’t addressed this.
 
I haven't seen the rainfall totals for this storm. But with Helene, some areas in NC received 30" in 48 hours. The floodplain limit for that area is based on a storm of about 11" in 24 hours. That's roughly the 100-year average frequency, or 1% annual chance rainfall amount for that area. There have been many other instances of way higher than 100-year storm occurrences over the last 15 years or so. Harvey in Houston was 50" over about 3-4 days. Nashville in 2010 or 2011 was roughly two 1% chance storms in total precipitation. Higher temperatures create more intense storms.


Not blaming it on Trump, but the way to contain flooding damage is to remove development from areas that will get flooded. Most developers are always trying to cut corners to get as much developable land as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill - Shy Cat
I haven't seen the rainfall totals for this storm. But with Helene, some areas in NC received 30" in 48 hours. The floodplain limit for that area is based on a storm of about 11" in 24 hours. That's roughly the 100-year average frequency, or 1% annual chance rainfall amount for that area. There have been many other instances of way higher than 100-year storm occurrences over the last 15 years or so. Harvey in Houston was 50" over about 3-4 days. Nashville in 2010 or 2011 was roughly two 1% chance storms in total precipitation. Higher temperatures create more intense storms.


Not blaming it on Trump, but the way to contain flooding damage is to remove development from areas that will get flooded. Most developers are always trying to cut corners to get as much developable land as possible.
The weather channel says it's the cow farts but they are working on a vaccine that should help. 🤣
 
BG / Warren Co and surrounding areas was hit pretty hard. The McDonalds on 31W ALWAYS floods when a torrential rain comes. The Alvaton area was hit pretty hard also.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: vhcat70
Interesting link from The Weather Channel. I'm surprised Texas is #1 even with the huge population. You don't hear of flash floods that much here, except in the Hill Country. It's usually flash floods that kill the most.

 
Interesting link from The Weather Channel. I'm surprised Texas is #1 even with the huge population. You don't hear of flash floods that much here, except in the Hill Country. It's usually flash floods that kill the most.

Wonder how many of those are from Houston?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FtWorthCat
Hard not to notice a change of tone when repeated disasters happen in Kentucky as opposed to say, the repeated wildfires in California. This is why choosing to hate random states just because is really, really stupid and pointless.

FtWorthCat posted some good info. All I know is I've listened to KSR over the years and have heard Matt Jones talk about the repeated disasters, from tornados to floods, that seem to hit the same areas. Seems like a pattern, unless you believe parts of various states are just being punished from above over and over again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GJNorman
To me this is Cal realizing he messed up, doesn't want to live out his retirement days in Fayetteville and wants people to think he still cares about Kentucky. Otherwise he would donate and not "announce" it.

Absurd. He has supported and contributed at every opportunity when the State has been in need. I'm glad he's moved on as coach, and I don't doubt that he wishes he was still in Lexington, but your post is either low IQ or out of scorn.
 
Absurd. He has supported and contributed at every opportunity when the State has been in need. I'm glad he's moved on as coach, and I don't doubt that he wishes he was still in Lexington, but your post is either low IQ or out of scorn.

It is my opinion that he "announced" it to either be seen or for some other self serving motive. Otherwise he could have just made the donation and not beat his chest about it. I don't know why, unless you are a Calipari family member, you were so upset about comment as to bring my intelligence into the argument but if you don't like it I have some advice for you.... you may want to go ahead and block me because I have some opinions that might hurt your feelings. 🤣
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT