Has to be a factor in seeding.
ZERO chance UK is a 3 seed.It won’t. We are either the top 2 seed or we slip to a 3 depending on tourney performance.
Has to be a factor in seeding.
Dumb Question: I imagine these move around as teams go in and out of the NET rankings?
Also, does anyone have that ASCII-style page that shows every teams Quadrant wins? That Gonzaga fan started a thread with it.
A 3 seed is a literal impossibility, even if we lose our next 2 games. We are most likely somewhere between #3-#6 on the S-curve regardless of how we close the season.It won’t. We are either the top 2 seed or we slip to a 3 depending on tourney performance.
A 3 seed is a literal impossibility, even if we lose our next 2 games. We are most likely somewhere between #3-#6 on the S-curve regardless of how we close the season.
Remember 2011. Don’t underestimate the power of the committee to screw us.
If the Zags are the #1 overall it is total bullshit. They are 4-2 against quad 1 teams and have amassed 25 wins against teams in quad 2 - 4, with 19 of them being quad 3 and 4 wins. That is embarrassing. That shit doesn't even deserve a 1 seed and I believe the Zags are actually legit this season.
I can agree with this. Based on talent, I think they are a top 5 team. Based on resume, they are probably a 3 seed.If the Zags are the #1 overall it is total bullshit. They are 4-2 against quad 1 teams and have amassed 25 wins against teams in quad 2 - 4, with 19 of them being quad 3 and 4 wins. That is embarrassing. That shit doesn't even deserve a 1 seed and I believe the Zags are actually legit this season.
it’s no use lolWe had 8 losses in 2011 and Literally won zero meaningful road games in conference.
We had 8 losses going into the tournament and were a 4 seed. Only 1 team with 8 or more losses was better than a 4 seed, and they won the National Championship. That was a fair seed.Remember 2011. Don’t underestimate the power of the committee to screw us.
We had 8 losses going into the tournament and were a 4 seed. Only 1 team with 8 or more losses was better than a 4 seed, and they won the National Championship. That was a fair seed.
It won’t. We are either the top 2 seed or we slip to a 3 depending on tourney performance.
Dumb Question: I imagine these move around as teams go in and out of the NET rankings?
Also, does anyone have that ASCII-style page that shows every teams Quadrant wins? That Gonzaga fan started a thread with it.
This is what worries me. They find a way to give UK the shaft every season, it seems. The only time we haven't been screwed over is the year... oh wait, there hasn't been one.Quad wins will be cited as a factor for why the committee seeded team A higher than expected, but ignored when asked why UK is seeded lower than expected. Rinse, repeat...until the end of time.
While I agree with you, it's absolutely ridiculous that we need to do more "work" or win out in order to pass UNCheat. We should be past them already.I think the best case scenario at this point is duke and UNC get the other 1 seeds and we pass both of them for the south. We need duke to lose 2 more games, UNC to lose early in the ACC tourney, and UK to win out.
It would also help us tremendously if Kansas wins out. That would give us another tier A quad 1 win. Auburn needs to win up until the sec finals as well. That would likely push them up to tier A. Our sec tourney path would need to be miss st, tenn, auburn.
That would put us around 15 quad 1 wins on the year with 11 or 12 of them being tier A. I don’t think any team could touch that. But that’s an absolute best case. Unlikely all those things happen.
Borzello confirms:I think Virginia actually has the most tier a quad 1 wins. They have 8. We’re tied with duke and UNC for 2nd most with 7.
We need Kansas to win out. That would almost assuredly push them up to a tier A. They’re 18th in net right now. Since it’s a home win over them they need to be 15th for it to be tier A.
Auburn performing well down the stretch would help too. I think they’re right behind Kansas at 19th. If auburn wins up to the sec final... they would end up as a tier a home win as well. We could theoretically gain 3 tier A wins over the next 8 days while only actually winning 1 more tier A game(sec semis against Tennessee).
Looks like it's about time for the target to move.Borzello confirms:
Oh it will be.Has to be a factor in seeding.
Borzello confirms:
Love your optimism, man. I really do. I'll believe we lock up the 1 in the South when I see it. I just have zero confidence in the committee to do UK any favors whatsoever.Oh it will be.
Win out and UK will probably have damn near 15 Quad 1 wins and will lock up the South.
It won’t. We are either the top 2 seed or we slip to a 3 depending on tourney performance.
Not just no, but hell no. We could lose today and the first game next weekend and would drop no lower than the final 2 seed.It won’t. We are either the top 2 seed or we slip to a 3 depending on tourney performance.
Ole Miss should have given us 8. It was a road game and they are top 40.I think Virginia actually has the most tier a quad 1 wins. They have 8. We’re tied with duke and UNC for 2nd most with 7.
We need Kansas to win out. That would almost assuredly push them up to a tier A. They’re 18th in net right now. Since it’s a home win over them they need to be 15th for it to be tier A.
Auburn performing well down the stretch would help too. I think they’re right behind Kansas at 19th. If auburn wins up to the sec final... they would end up as a tier a home win as well. We could theoretically gain 3 tier A wins over the next 8 days while only actually winning 1 more tier A game(sec semis against Tennessee).
It jumped them up 1 spot to #5 in the updated net rankings. Will get another one tomorrow (if/when we win) and would likely get 2 more in the SECT.