Kalkbrenner (Creighton) 90.5% from 2pt range

[JonathanW]

He is shooting 87.2% overall. But his 3-5 (60%) from 3pt brings down the overall.
He has made 38-42 of his 2pt shots!

 

[NociHTTP]

Who has the best 1pt %?

Carr is probably the best for us, tied for second most makes.

I saw an article where it's been suggested that the NBA score 3pts for challenged dunks, to try and reduce the number of three point attempts.

 

[LineSkiCat14]

He'll shoot like 35% and Creighton will lose in the opening weekend of the tournament as a 6 seed, which feels like the most Creighton thing to do.

 

[Fox2monk]

He is shooting 87.2% overall. But his 3-5 (60%) from 3pt brings down the overall.
He has made 38-42 of his 2pt shots!

He’s a monster now. Perfect UK type player for our future. Not super high ranked but good size and skill. Stayed and has improved every year and now he’s one of the 3 Best big men in college ball and probable AA.

 

[bluefaithful]

They lost at home to Nebraska by 11.

 

[Fox2monk]

Who has the best 1pt %?

Carr is probably the best for us, tied for second most makes.

I saw an article where it's been suggested that the NBA score 3pts for challenged dunks, to try and reduce the number of three point attempts.

They should probably move the line back another inch and that will further space the court, reduce 3 %, and encourage more mid range game and drives.

 

[Fox2monk]

They lost at home to Nebraska by 11.

I’m shocked by that. I think Hoiberg is a decent coach, but I never think he will get enough players to truly be great. He lost his best shooter from last year. This little Asian kid Tominaga who killed Indiana 2 times last year. He had like 30 something and hit 6-7 3’s in their grill every game.

 

[EliteBlue]

I saw an article where it's been suggested that the NBA score 3pts for challenged dunks, to try and reduce the number of three point attempts.

man I really hope they don’t do that…talk about completely bastardizing the game with a stupid rule to “fix” something that isn’t broken.

Much less who gets to decide what is “challenged” or not. There are varying levels of challenging and that’s highly subjective. Also encourages more ppl to not jump and challenge the dunk more than anything…not only do you risk a foul but also giving an additional point by challenging.

If you hate that the game is so 3 pt dominant now and the big man has been neglected you’d be better off removing the 3 pt line or backing it up another 3 feet

 

[runt#69]

man I really hope they don’t do that…talk about completely bastardizing the game with a stupid rule to “fix” something that isn’t broken. Much less who gets to decide what is “challenged” or not. There are varying levels of challenging and that’s highly subjective. Also encourages more ppl to not jump and challenge the dunk more than anything…not only do you risk a foul but also giving an additional point by challenging. If you hate that the game is so 3 pt dominant now and the big man has been neglected you’d be better off removing the 3 pt line or backing it up another 3 feet

I'm in agreement, they sure don't need to fix what ain't broken....

What would do this sport an infinite amount of benefit would be to have this :

Make NCAA officials salaried employees and have them held accountable by a panel of overseers as well as themselves. Make them answer to calls post game and have the various conferences monitor them as another measure of accountability and control.

Some games are so horribly officiated they're impossible to watch and enjoy.


NCAA officiating has been neglected for far too long. PUT THEM under the microscope and clean the game up that way.

But of course, they'll never do that.