ADVERTISEMENT

Josh Langford.......to

May 18, 2015
63
12
8
Indications to Michigan State
2016 MSU commit Nick Ward just tweeted that "we got another Spartan"
This while Langford has been on a long weekend visit to East Lansing. Interesting if true.
 
Someone said the other day that Langford was out for UK. I guess this could be why.

If true, you guys could be putting together a nice recruiting class.

I think you will probably get Bridges as well.
 
Pretty excited about Ward as well. Kid has really come on in the last year. Great back to the basket moves( and he is a lefty) and a very good rebounder. Kind of a more polished and more fit Nix type.
The question is Cassius Winston. Much needed point guard, seems to be hanging out in Ann Arbor a lot recently. Izzo has made him a huge priority, perhaps with Langford's handles a Winson miss will become not as important.

Guess Langford has been on campus since late Wednesday, and is still there.
 
Indications to Michigan State
2016 MSU commit Nick Ward just tweeted that "we got another Spartan"
This while Langford has been on a long weekend visit to East Lansing. Interesting if true.
MSU board is -------->. I don't see Langford and Bridges at the same school.
 
You kidding?
Probably 60% of the threads on here relate to something other than UK..... And I read on here daily.
If a recruit is a UK target, why would talk of him not be worth discussing?
Nope. MSU has a board of its own. Coming here for validation or to only point to players choosing MSU over UK shouldn't be your only purpose for being on this board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LineSkiCat
You kidding?
Probably 60% of the threads on here relate to something other than UK..... And I read on here daily.
If a recruit is a UK target, why would talk of him not be worth discussing?

Feel free to post, just make sure it's not just about beating us for a recruit.

You will endear yourself much more to the "natives" if you also post when UK beats out MSU for a recruit, not just vice versa.

It can come off as gloating when you come over here and just talk about your team getting guys we are after.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LineSkiCat
Nope. MSU has a board of its own. Coming here for validation or to only point to players choosing MSU over UK shouldn't be your only purpose for being on this board.
Shut it. Dude was trying to have civil conversation. If you're not smart enough to handle that, then that's your problem.
 
Wouldn't hurt my feelings if UK finally gave Langford's offer to Fultz. He wants to come to UK and can play three positions. And he can actually shoot.
I feel the same way. However, I really want Rawle Alkins.
 
Indications to Michigan State
2016 MSU commit Nick Ward just tweeted that "we got another Spartan"
This while Langford has been on a long weekend visit to East Lansing. Interesting if true.
If Langford doesn't end up in Lexington, won't surprise me. Calipari already has a guard heavy roster this year, and a lot more guards interested in Kentucky next year. Simmons is believed leaning to Kentucky. Monk and Alkins interested in Kentucky. Maybe Battle or Jackson, although will take more time for those 2 to play out. Langford is another good player, but not a must.
 
If Langford doesn't end up in Lexington, won't surprise me. Calipari already has a guard heavy roster this year, and a lot more guards interested in Kentucky next year. Simmons is believed leaning to Kentucky. Monk and Alkins interested in Kentucky. Maybe Battle or Jackson, although will take more time for those 2 to play out. Langford is another good player, but not a must.

I think Ulis will be back. So will Matthews and Mulder. I also think Lee will be back along with Wynyard inside.

So our main targets are probably (assuming Giles and Tatum are Duke bound):

Guard- Simmons- at 6'5 can play the 1-3. Replaces Briscoe.

Wing- one of Monk, Alkins, Langford, Battle, Fultz. Plays the 2 and 3 spots. Replaces Murray (hopefully).

Forward- one of Bridges or Isaac. Plays the 3 and 4. Replaces Poythress.

Big- one of Killya-Jones, Ayton (if he reclassifies), Maker, Cage, Banks. Replaces Labissiere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe
I think Ulis will be back. So will Matthews and Mulder. I also think Lee will be back along with Wynyard inside.

So our main targets are probably (assuming Giles and Tatum are Duke bound):

Guard- Simmons- at 6'5 can play the 1-3. Replaces Briscoe.

Wing- one of Monk, Alkins, Langford, Battle, Fultz. Plays the 2 and 3 spots. Replaces Murray (hopefully).

Forward- one of Bridges or Isaac. Plays the 3 and 4. Replaces Poythress.

Big- one of Killya-Jones, Ayton (if he reclassifies), Maker, Cage, Banks. Replaces Labissiere.
I think that is pretty close to what will happen.
 
U9K and Jaycatz44 acting like a couple of teenage girls. Getting catty over something that has nothing to do with either of them. I will say this though, the kid that the MSU fan is referring to is a UK recruit, so I for one would like to hear any news that I can possibly hear out of interest toward our recruiting. That said, I would prefer if those of you trying to rudely run the guy off would preface your ill-mannered comments by saying that you speak for yourselves (which really serves no purpose, because you don't even have to read the thread nor post). Stop trying to speak for the other couple thousand people that use this forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukfan03
Hmm. I like Langfor
U9K and Jaycatz44 acting like a couple of teenage girls. Getting catty over something that has nothing to do with either of them. I will say this though, the kid that the MSU fan is referring to is a UK recruit, so I for one would like to hear any news that I can possibly hear out of interest toward our recruiting. That said, I would prefer if those of you trying to rudely run the guy off would preface your ill-mannered comments by saying that you speak for yourselves (which really serves no purpose, because you don't even have to read the thread nor post). Stop trying to speak for the other couple thousand people that use this forum.
Agreed. I have no problem with the OP. It's not like he was being a jerk or rubbing it in our faces. I would like to know about Langford, good or bad.
 
Well, so far no news of Langford commiting while in East Lansing.
Ward's tweet obviously regards a commitment from someone and as a prominent( and highly regarded) poster on the 24/7 board stated, there are currently only 3 2016 targets MSU has. Langford, Bridges, and Cassius Winston.
There are some 2017 kids with offers, but other than Brian " Tugs" Bowen, a legacy recruit( Jason Richardson's cousin) none are considered heavy MSU leans that would be commiting at this time.

Winston is a MSU/ UM likely destination kid with recent word UM has gained steam. Would surprise me he would commit right now. That leaves Bridges and Langford, and possibly the 2017 stud, Bowen. But seems mighty early for him.
I pay WAY more attention to recruiting than I should, it's borderline insane figuring out what kids these days have in mind.... Lol
 
Jaycatz44,

Can you elaborate on your statement about Langford and Bridges?
I think it's unlikely they both end up at MSU. Both are pure wing players. I think Langford choosing MSU only helps UK with Bridges.
 
Bridges is cast in Dawson's mold, a 3 but with better perimeter skills. Langford can play point if needed, but more a combo.
Izzo will use Langford similar to how he uses Valentine currently, and told him that on his visit.
These two guys are completely different players and could easily co- exist.
Bridges and Winston are still the two primary targets. With Langford, Winston is now more a want than a must have, as Langford can handle the ball.
That said, the 7 foot transfer kid from Providence is on campus today for a visit.
 
I think it's unlikely they both end up at MSU. Both are pure wing players. I think Langford choosing MSU only helps UK with Bridges.

Oh, I thought you had a scoop or something.

In that case, I have to disagree with you.

Bridges is a forward and Langford is a guard. Bridges will play the 3 and the 4 spots. Langford plays the 2 or 3.

They can definitely play together.
 
Bridges is cast in Dawson's mold, a 3 but with better perimeter skills. Langford can play point if needed, but more a combo.
Izzo will use Langford similar to how he uses Valentine currently, and told him that on his visit.
These two guys are completely different players and could easily co- exist.
Bridges and Winston are still the two primary targets. With Langford, Winston is now more a want than a must have, as Langford can handle the ball.
That said, the 7 foot transfer kid from Providence is on campus today for a visit.

Yep.

I see Langford as another Valentine and Bridges as another Dawson.

They will spend most of their time at the 3 (Langford) and 4 (Bridges).

Do you think Nairn will keep Winston away? Nairn will be a Junior and will likely start all season for ya'll. I'm sure they could play together, but would Winston want to share the ball?

What is your take?
 
Oh, I thought you had a scoop or something.

In that case, I have to disagree with you.

Bridges is a forward and Langford is a guard. Bridges will play the 3 and the 4 spots. Langford plays the 2 or 3.

They can definitely play together.
Bridges is too undersized to play the PF spot, especially if he wants to ever play in the NBA. Langford doesn't shoot it well enough to play the 2 spot. Both will see a significant amount of their college playing time at the SF spot.
 
I think it's unlikely they both end up at MSU. Both are pure wing players. I think Langford choosing MSU only helps UK with Bridges.

I think Langford will be a 2 and Bridges will be a 3 who who really knows.

What I do know is that Bridges is friends with Draymond, Mateen, and all the other Flintstones. He's know them his whole life. He's in constant contact with them. Even with Langford in the fold, I'd be somewhat surprised if Bridges didn't ultimately end up at MSU.
 
I think a lot of people underestimate Tum Tum. He admittedly can't shoot( but has undergone an intense shooting regimen this off season to hopefully fix that)
Izzo has already named him a co captain along with Valentine this upcoming season. He has some huge plus intangibles regards leadership skills, can defend, and has outstanding quickness.
Regards keeping Winson away, that is the million dollar question, because Nairn is a 4 year player and is going to play a good bit.
There are so many shooters on the roster( and Eron Harris may stay both years, and was worked a ton at the point last season while sitting out) that it's a valid question with Winson.
Michigan seems to have really tightened things up regards Winston, your point could well be why.
I know Bridges and Winston are close and ideally would like to play together, but I personally don't think that is an overriding factor in where they end up.
Gun to my head..... MSU is more likely to get Bridges than Winston
 
I think Langford will be a 2 and Bridges will be a 3 who who really knows.

What I do know is that Bridges is friends with Draymond, Mateen, and all the other Flintstones. He's know them his whole life. He's in constant contact with them. Even with Langford in the fold, I'd be somewhat surprised if Bridges didn't ultimately end up at MSU.
Like I said, Langford doesn't shoot it well enough to be a 2 and Bridges is too undersized to play the 4.
Terrence Jones was friends with most of the Washington players, with his best friend choosing the school. The same was said about Archie Goodwin and Arkansas. Both of them were seen on multiple occasions playing pickup with players from opposing schools before picking UK.
 
I enjoy when other teams fans come here to talk basketball. Just shows that we have the most passionate fan base and their passionate fans know where to go if they want to talk hoops in the offseason.

As long as they are civil and not trolls then all is well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrpross
Bridges is too undersized to play the PF spot, especially if he wants to ever play in the NBA. Langford doesn't shoot it well enough to play the 2 spot. Both will see a significant amount of their college playing time at the SF spot.

At 6'6, 220 he is about the same size as Dawson (who played the 4 for MSU) and Winslow (who was the 4 on Duke's championship team).

Bridges plays the 3 and 4 spots. Langford plays the 2 and 3 spots. They will be able to play together.

I don't think they will have any bearing on each other.
 
At 6'6, 220 he is about the same size as Dawson (who played the 4 for MSU) and Winslow (who was the 4 on Duke's championship team).

Bridges plays the 3 and 4 spots. Langford plays the 2 and 3 spots. They will be able to play together.

I don't think they will have any bearing on each other.
Yes, in college. However, if Bridges wants to have a long career in the NBA he needs to be tailored for the SF position. If his intentions are to only have a good college career then playing the PF position is the way to go. Both will be better served to play the 3 spot in college.
 
Yes, in college. However, if Bridges wants to have a long career in the NBA he needs to be tailored for the SF position. If his intentions are to only have a good college career then playing the PF position is the way to go. Both will be better served to play the 3 spot in college.

Remember what Cal said about "positionless players?"

Bridges might play the 4 in college and the 3 in the pros.

It didn't hurt Winslow's draft stock, did it?
 
Remember what Cal said about "positionless players?"

Bridges might play the 4 in college and the 3 in the pros.

It didn't hurt Winslow's draft stock, did it?
Bridges won't play the 4 here. I'd bet on it.
Of course it didn't. Winslow played both the 3 and 4 in college for only 1 year and was a top player coming into the season. A one-and-done. I don't see Bridges as being a one-and-done player. If he goes to MSU and plays the 4, his stock will fall each season he is there.
 
Like I said, Langford doesn't shoot it well enough to be a 2 and Bridges is too undersized to play the 4.
Terrence Jones was friends with most of the Washington players, with his best friend choosing the school. The same was said about Archie Goodwin and Arkansas. Both of them were seen on multiple occasions playing pickup with players from opposing schools before picking UK.

No offense, but Washington hoops? Lol

Bridges is from Flint and has know those past MSU players for a long long time...he face times with Draymond during the NBA playoffs. Not sure Goodwin and Jones are good examples here.
 
Yep, enjoy knowledgable banter.
Here and the Kansas board are the epicenter( IMO) of such fans.
UK is a front runner every year under Cal.
MSU, beginning this upcoming season will be decidedly in the mix of true threats to win it all for the next 2-3 years.
IF Eron Harris ends up playing both this year and next, his senior year MSU will be out and out stacked
Harris
Langford
Nick Ward
Deyonta Davis
Tum
Matt Mc Quaid( kid is going to be an elite Shooter)
Marvin Clark
Schilling
Maybe Bridges and or Winson
That potential team will be better than this years team( which has way more upside than last years team)
 
No offense, but Washington hoops? Lol

Bridges is from Flint and has know those past MSU players for a long long time...he face times with Draymond during the NBA playoffs. Not sure Goodwin and Jones are good examples here.

Both were good examples whether you want to believe them or not. Goodwin was from Arkansas and had many friends on the team and played pickup ball there almost daily.

Bridges is from Flint, but chose to go away from home to play high school basketball. Why wouldn't he do the same to play college basketball at UK?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT