I agree. Lindsay is in the Doug Shows category. I don’t think he necessarily has something against UK—he just stinks at his job.They both suck.
I agree. Lindsay is in the Doug Shows category. I don’t think he necessarily has something against UK—he just stinks at his job.
And yet I've noticed that 100% of those conference games have been reffed.We’re giving up almost 90 points a game in the conference.
Refs have little to do with it.
Rest time. Dude can’t hang and needs breaks whenever possible, sometimes he has to manufacture them.This. I've seen him do other games and he's just bad at his job plus he likes to make sure Joe gets his air time with multiple reviews.
And yet I've noticed that 100% of those conference games have been reffed.
I’ve said for years all officials should be under control of the ncaa and employees. Uniform training, game assignment and accountability.Serious note, they work too much. Too many games.
2-5 in our last seven when this crooked POS Lindsay is involved.I actually think Lindsay is ok. Poole on the other hand ,,,,,,
Or you can act like officiating isn't a part of the problem and pretend they are great at their jobs and above scrutiny. Is our defense bad? Yes Has the officiating been bad? Yes So both things can be true. They say the more aggressive team gets the whistle but Saturday Bama took 50% of their shots from 3 point range (34 of 67) and UK took 36% of their shots (27 of 73) from 3 point range which would indicate UK was taking more shots in the lane/at the rim and thus should have received at least a similar amount of free throws. The latter was not only not true but we had a 34-20 discrepancy at home where you usually have the "Home Court Advantage".Or you can keep crying about officials instead of addressing the problems.
2-5 in our last seven when this crooked POS Lindsay is involved.
2-5 in our last seven when this crooked POS Lindsay is involved.
Where did you see this? I saw someone report on Twitter (prior to the Alabama game) that we had won 11 in a row that Joe Lindsay officiated, including the Duke game this year.
It’s way too simplistic to say “Bama took half their shots from 3 and we took 36% of our shots from 3. The free throw numbers should be similar.” A good portion of Bama’s 3s come from them attacking the paint and kicking the ball. So even though they may take a long shot, it comes from them putting pressure on the defense in the paint.Or you can act like officiating isn't a part of the problem and pretend they are great at their jobs and above scrutiny. Is our defense bad? Yes Has the officiating been bad? Yes So both things can be true. They say the more aggressive team gets the whistle but Saturday Bama took 50% of their shots from 3 point range (34 of 67) and UK took 36% of their shots (27 of 73) from 3 point range which would indicate UK was taking more shots in the lane/at the rim and thus should have received at least a similar amount of free throws. The latter was not only not true but we had a 34-20 discrepancy at home where you usually have the "Home Court Advantage".
To me the biggest thing with the calls was touch fouls being called on drives for Bama was not called when we drove to the basket. Was most of the egregious? No but they were inconsistent. In 5 SEC games it's been basically an average of 30-20 free throw attemps in favor of the opponents. In our OOC games against P5 schools it is 24-20 free throws per game in favor of UK. So I'm not buying into Matt Jones explanation that we are horrible on defense and foul too much due to not being as athletic because in the pre conference schedule we weren't having the same issues.