I'm biased too, and I get your points about Flagg still having a way to go on development to reach what his potential portends. But knowing what draft decisions are usually based on, I can definitely see why Flagg is considered the #1 draft pick. He’s young, skilled, athletic, and plays hard. All that bodes well for becoming an NBA impact starter in the not too distant future. Plus, it doesn’t hurt that he’s probably viewed as pretty marketable.Maybe I'm biased because he's a Dukie, but I'm not seeing the hype. Don't get me wrong it is impressive for a 17 year old to compete right away, but he he was under 50% FG% and only made one of his five 3s. I'm sure he'll be good and probably be an NBA level player but instant #1 pick hype I didn't see.
Moreover, Flagg’s ups & downs over the season are unlikely to change that draft position. Although, Ace Bailey or possibly even Dylan Harper could steal that #1 pick status if they seem to present even more UPSIDE - because that’s what the draft is all about, not winning college games and certainly not about being the “best” player in college – but I would still bet on Flagg at #1 and Bailey at #2, and then maybe a half-dozen better (defined as most impactful to winning a championship) college players who might not even get drafted or go in the 2nd round.