ADVERTISEMENT

Is Pope the best x and o's coach we have had?

The zone?

If Tubby was so good then why didn’t he win anything before here or after here?
Tubby had a winning record ever place he coached except his last stop at High Point,he did win before here and after.
 
Tubby. Master of x's and o's and to this day the ball line defense was the best I've seen out of any UK team.
Ball Line Defense! To quote Tubby " I learned it from JD Barnett at Virginia Commonwealth University" It was designed to stop penetration to the basket and was very affective, but.. It opened up the perimeter which was Tubby's achilles heel. In the age of modern basketball, ball line defense is obsolete. Respectfully.

I thought Tubby did a really good job at UK and he's a true class act, just a different time and a much changed sport.
 
Last edited:
Devil's advocate: why did we fall behind in so many tournament games under Tubby? Duke, Stanford, Utah, Kansas, USC, Marquette, Michigan State.
That is a good question. The first three, UK came back to win and those teams had some great coaches/talent in their own right. I think USC just got hot at the right time. Marquette was the unfortunate injury to Bogans. Kansas did have more talent, I'll admit that. Michigan State that year was one of the best teams in the nation, which UK came back to nearly pull that one off too.
 
The zone?

If Tubby was so good then why didn’t he win anything before here or after here?

Tubby's body of work was good before and after. He was at programs that didn't have much history and he did elevate them. For a long while Tulsa was one of the premier mid majors after Tubby built them up. Georgia was a 3 seed in 97, which they fell to Chattanooga that year in the tournament. He also did well at Minnesota and Texas Tech. Won the first NCAA Tournament game at Minnesota for the first time in 16 years or so, and got Texas Tech back in the tournament and left them in great hands. Memphis was foolish for firing him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbncal02
The zone?

If Tubby was so good then why didn’t he win anything before here or after here?
Tubby has taken 5 teams to the NCAAT. Only three other coaches have done so (Steve Alford, Lon Kruger and of course Ricky P).

The man could coach. Game just go the point it passed him by for the most part. Doesn't mean he was never good.

Same thing has happened to Cal. Cal will probably have FOUR schools he took to the NCAAT unless he hangs it up before he gets Arky there. And we all know how bad Cal has been lately. But he took 3 schools to the FF.

It's just a lot of coaches just refuse to adjust their styles and it costs them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ArcadiaFan
Ball Line Defense! To quote Tubby " I learned it from JD Barnett at Virginia Commonwealth University" It was designed to stop penetration to the basket and was very affective, but.. It opened up the perimeter which was Tubby's Achilles heel. In the age of modern basketball, ball line defense is obsolete. Respectfully.

I thought Tubby did a really good job at UK and he's a true class act, just a different time and a much changed sport.

For the most part, ball line is dead. But it comes in handy when you face a team that's not a great perimeter shooting team. It's a neat tool to keep around to mix it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArcadiaFan
That is a good question. The first three, UK came back to win and those teams had some great coaches/talent in their own right. I think USC just got hot at the right time. Marquette was the unfortunate injury to Bogans. Kansas did have more talent, I'll admit that. Michigan State that year was one of the best teams in the nation, which UK came back to nearly pull that one off too.

That Marquette team was pretty damn good too. And what a weird tournament. ALL the one seeds made the E8. ONE of them made the FF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArcadiaFan
That is a good question. The first three, UK came back to win and those teams had some great coaches/talent in their own right. I think USC just got hot at the right time. Marquette was the unfortunate injury to Bogans. Kansas did have more talent, I'll admit that. Michigan State that year was one of the best teams in the nation, which UK came back to nearly pull that one off too.
Yeah 98 you just chalked it up to the personality of that team and the quality of opponent. But the Jeff Boschee Kansas team? USC? UAB? Marquette? Those last three got smoked in their next game. As did Michigan State in 05.

For whatever reason we never seemed to be ready at the start of all those games. We came roaring back in all of them, but used up all our energy in doing so and petered out at the end.
 
No. In fact I’ve been a bit disappointed with his x/o’s given what was said about him being basically a basketball savant.

I’d say the best is Pitino, possibly Tubby.

The worst is a fight between Cal and Billy. I’d lean towards Billy being better though.
 
Joe B Hall was no slouch. Very innovative for his time.
Joe B's teams were as good on day 1 of the season as they were on the last day of the season
If the NCAAT had been played in December he would have won 4 or 5 championships. His game
planning was good as long as things went like he thought they would. In game adjustments
were not his strong suit. Sitting the starting 5 at the beginning of the 2nd half of the game
vs Michigan St (and Magic) was his greatest move ever.
 
Ball Line Defense! To quote Tubby " I learned it from JD Barnett at Virginia Commonwealth University" It was designed to stop penetration to the basket and was very affective, but.. It opened up the perimeter which was Tubby's achilles heel. In the age of modern basketball, ball line defense is obsolete. Respectfully.

I thought Tubby did a really good job at UK and he's a true class act, just a different time and a much changed sport.
Class acts don't put playing their son ahead of the good of the program.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT