I hate when my team runs out of time 😜, so I (seriously) hold the unpopular opinion that moving to a 24-second shot clock would further ruin college basketball. More shots in a game does NOT make for a better, more exciting, game. (PLEASE, understand that.) It makes for a sloppier, lazier, more selfish game. Instead of “not-good” players repeatedly & selfishly chucking long shots (one vs five), how about the game return to a game of offensive TEAMwork and “finding the (truly) open man”? And, on defense, make all five players work harder. Recognize defense as just as exciting and worthwhile as offense. NBA players shoot the ball way, way better, so let THEM keep the 24, and let them out-muscle and bulldoze over each other, selfishly and strategy-free. It used to be that unathletic-but-poised/skilled/well-coached, “together”, slower teams could beat super-athletic, undisciplined, impatient, poorly coached, “selfish” teams.
I.E., I’d rather the shot-clock go back up to 35 than to shorten again (down to 24), so as to reward skill, poise/patience & teamwork (both offensively and defensively). Reduce the rate of sloppy, selfish, 3-point chucking.
CBS Sports article, last year: “Candid Coaches: Should college basketball keep the 30-second shot clock or change to 24?” (The polled coaches were split, 50/50, on the matter.)
Also, I kinda like the Elam Ending (also unpopular). Guess I’m not all that sure about it… but I kinda like it. Tries to reduce end-game fouling and game ends on a basket.