I thought Tennesssee fans traveled well?
- Thread starter FiveStarCat
- Start date
All I know is I don’t want to hear about our fans having a huge advantage anymore. It doesn’t matter, Kentucky loses everytime they have the fan advantage at neutral sites now
Not necessarily. Atlanta was loaded with Cats fans for the win over Duke. But I do agree it doesn’t seem to help as much as it used to.
That’s all you know? Once again your username makes no sense. All you do is worry about things. And post inaccurate crap like this.
hard to have a big fan advantage in a cavern that holds 75-80K people and its cut in two to form a hoops area .. I hate the atmosphere these domes provide . the players setting in some dugout type spot .
And you like 90 percent of the stuff I post so what’s that say about you. And no it’s not inaccurate everytime we hear about Kentucky having a crowd advantage at a neutral site they lose
And also shut the heck up with the dang username stuff it’s such a stupid ass joke that people make
Eh.
1) I've never heard anyone say Tennessee fans travel well.
2) with Purdue and Kentucky both out, tickets are still going for no less than $70 in terrible nose bleed sections.
3) Costs 200 to 300 to sit in any decent seats.
3) StubHub only has ~300 available so that arena is still going to be pretty full.
1) I've never heard anyone say Tennessee fans travel well.
2) with Purdue and Kentucky both out, tickets are still going for no less than $70 in terrible nose bleed sections.
3) Costs 200 to 300 to sit in any decent seats.
3) StubHub only has ~300 available so that arena is still going to be pretty full.
Given the option of having a large turnout vs not, like most other schools, I will take our crowd. It just shows our fans love the Cats and CBB.
Yeah. Roaming packs of inbred shitheads.There were a lot of them in Columbus last fall.
