I like Darrin Hall but I would rather use that scholly for a position of need and sign two top backs next year.
Hall IS a top back. Take him if you can get him.Originally posted by DaBossIsBack:
I like Darrin Hall but I would rather use that scholly for a position of need and sign two top backs next year.
So instead of finishing this class by addressing areas of weakness, we should add a RB just because he is highly rated? Makes sense.Originally posted by catnerd:
No...Just No.
Refusing him? Last I checked he was committed to Pitt. Corner, Lb, Ol, DE all need more talent. RB is our most talented position.Originally posted by Rhavicc:
And what areas of weakness do you see? What can be accomplished by refusing this RB, and instead, picking up 2 RB's next year?
We do have quite a few scholarships left, ya know.
As if you know what the 25 scholarships should be used on that don't include an RB.Originally posted by DaBossIsBack:
I like Darrin Hall but I would rather use that scholly for a position of need and sign two top backs next year.
Was that necessary?Originally posted by vhcat70:
As if you know what the 25 scholarships should be used on that don't include an RB.Originally posted by DaBossIsBack:
I like Darrin Hall but I would rather use that scholly for a position of need and sign two top backs next year.
No Way! we only have five RBs. Clemons is still physically impaired. Boom has had concussions. We just a couple of injuries away from a really bad situation. This is the SEC. We NEED at least one more really good back. NOW.Originally posted by DaBossIsBack:
I like Darrin Hall but I would rather use that scholly for a position of need and sign two top backs next year.