I don't understand the T after Murray's dunk

[mdlUK.1]

the TV said they called it on Briscoe for slamming the ball but the T wasn't called until he pushed Murray, several seconds after the play. Did they ever say for sure what it was for? I know sirmons called it.

 

[Wildcat134]

Only legit reason for it would have been spiking the ball. Was a strange call either way.

 

[kyjeff1]

Briscoe slammed the ball on the court and allowed it to bounce really high.
It was a good call.

 

[catfan in loserville]

Slamming the ball on the floor like that is a delay of game technical foul, implemented a few years ago. If he would of just kept it from bouncing high in the air, no t would have been called.

 

[catsfan3523]

It should have been called for slamming the ball down, but Sirmons didn't call it until after he shoved Murray. I think he ended up giving it to him for something he heard him say to Murray.

 

[aikenite4uk]

Just one of many calls that Sirmons missed. He was awful both ways. Perhaps the worst official in the SEC...which is saying something.

 

[kitkoodle]

the T was for slamming the ball down..but it was briscoe who did it, right? then Murray after the fts for t thrown, got his foul shot