We inbound the ball, walk it up, get pressure full court, barely get the ball over the line in time.
Big stands at the 3 point line while guards run and cut, fake hand offs, guards run around like crazy, no one can get open.
Stupid lazy passing, turnover after turn over.
On defense we can not stay in front of the ball, leave shooters open space, don’t go after 50/50 ball, rebound issues.
I'll answer this from a coaching perspective (HS coach, NOT a college coach)
Pope's "zoom" offense is pretty efficient. But it has its flaws. The system needs players to "read and react" to the defense. We're seeing the pressure and the extended defense (Ole Miss for example) hurting UK's players read/react ability at full speed. Now in the 2nd half, obviously adjustments were made - UK went to more backcuts, more slips on the screens, more rejects on the screens (looks like a backdoor) and Kentucky had great offensive efficiency in the 2nd half - scored over 50 points in 2nd half I believe.
Pope maintains that the 1stH is about collecting data to win the 2ndH. Offensively, UK went from 31 pts in 1stH to 53 pts in 2ndH
Defensively UK gave up 54 in 1stH and 44 in 2ndH. The zone helped, more switching on defense helped, and Ole Miss playing a tad more conservatively helped too.
The offensive execution in the 1stH was really bad, no doubt about it. But came to life with adjustments in 2ndH. Keep in mind, this offense was SUPPOSED to have Butler running the show, then Kriisa - clearly we're without both
Pope and his staff have infinite more basketball knowledge than I do. But I would like to see Brea used more as a screener. Teams are denying him, chasing him everywhere - his defender is NOT going to help on screens. I'd like to see him used more as a screener away from the ball.
I'll also say this - Ole Miss is REALLY good defensively. I don't know what the metrics say, but when you don't typically play against a pressure defense that switches at ALL 5 positions, it can be really, really difficult to figure out