ADVERTISEMENT

How long until the "Barnhart was forced to hire Pope" cries begin?

Well yes and no.. I get where your coming from but I don't have any sympathy from Stoops when he's tried to leave UK the last couple years. But he wants to complain about not having enough NIL money.

Why would a booster pony up for a coach who has one foot out the door and the results are going the opposite direction in a much stronger/deeper SEC?
You’re implying Stoops is the problem with NIL. From what I understand, Stoops is the reason we have as much as we do. Apparently Stoops is very good friends with the football donors and has cultivated those relationships or we would be in much worse shape.
 
  • Love
Reactions: B.B.H.
The BCG era was the most exciting time in UK basketball history.

We will lose to VMI or will we beat UF? Will we have more points than turnovers? Who's the next middle school kid getting an offer? Will Perry Stevenson finish that entire box of Poptarts???
Sometimes I rewatch the 2007 Big Blue Madness just to laugh at how excited everyone was. We had no idea
 
Not sure I agree with this post as it specifically relates to Pope, but there are a lot of people who call for Barnhart to be fired at the drop of a hat. They seem to have something against him that isn't based in reality.
Yeah. I think some people never recovered from the microwave fans comments and feel he isn’t in touch w the pulse of the fanbase, only the donor class. The doubter to that is the donor class keeps the lights on so you do have to cater to them…but it’s a balancing act of still throwing the peasants a bone here and there on the easy “real fan” stuff
 
Yeah. I think some people never recovered from the microwave fans comments and feel he isn’t in touch w the pulse of the fanbase, only the donor class. The doubter to that is the donor class keeps the lights on so you do have to cater to them…but it’s a balancing act of still throwing the peasants a bone here and there on the easy “real fan” stuff
I think there is a chance that some of that dissension was introduced by a certain very loud voice with a whole lot of influence who didn’t like Barnhart for personal reasons. That very same influential loud voice was close to Cal at that time as well and we all know how Cal felt about Barnhart. I’ve felt that way for a very long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EliteBlue
How long until the "Barnhart was forced to hire Pope" cries begin? Sadly this is not really sarcasm. That "bitter people" being discussed in the other thread as some of these folks. Barnhart is their version of "orange man bad." Nothing MB has done has made them happy.

Will any of them FINALLY agree that MB actually does know what he is doing. Is there a single one of us that had Coach Pope on their personal radar screen? Certainly not on mine. In fact, all of our teams in men's and women's sports are in good hands.

Can we start to appreciate that we are good hands with Mitch Barnhart?
Pope was my first choice.
Ask my wife and 17 yr old son.
They both ridiculed me.
Now I make sure to let them know about my superior intellectual on the regular.
After the intro press event, even they were sold.
Signed,
A single one.
 
I think there is a chance that some of that dissension was introduced by a certain very loud voice with a whole lot of influence who didn’t like Barnhart for personal reasons. That very same influential loud voice was close to Cal at that time as well and we all know how Cal felt about Barnhart. I’ve felt that way for a very long time.
Potentially not wrong on that with how the timelines line up. Mitch has his flaws such as being a little slow/overly cautious to adapt to the changing environment in college athletics at times, or imo a little too much emphasis on no revenue secondary sports and chasing the Directors Cup as I worry that will hurt us when we have to decide how the conference revenue split 25mil NIL money will be divided up compared to how the other major players in Basketball/Football allocate there’s.

But overall he’s a really solid AD that’s kept the university out of major scandal in a scandalous 10-15 years of college athletics w FBI investigations etc …..and maybe some of that “slow to embrace the changing college landscape” played in our favor to keep us relatively clean…so it isn’t a black and white “bad trait” as long as he eventually adapts to the above board stuff and I think he finally has now
 
  • Love
Reactions: B.B.H.
I'm old enough to remember when the University's swim team had a big sexual assault scandal. In 2024.

I'm ecstatic about Pope and how things have turned out. Mitch doesn't get flowers. Get real.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Myotis
How long until the "Barnhart was forced to hire Pope" cries begin? Sadly this is not really sarcasm. That "bitter people" being discussed in the other thread as some of these folks. Barnhart is their version of "orange man bad." Nothing MB has done has made them happy.

Will any of them FINALLY agree that MB actually does know what he is doing. Is there a single one of us that had Coach Pope on their personal radar screen? Certainly not on mine. In fact, all of our teams in men's and women's sports are in good hands.

Can we start to appreciate that we are good hands with Mitch Barnhart?
Mitch made the right hire for sure. But he also botched the Gillispie hire, and it’s common knowledge Cal was not Mitch’s first choice. Cal wanted the job in 2007, and Sandy Bell/Mitch wouldn’t even look at him due to his UMass baggage/reputation. But we had dug such a hole with Tubby/BCG and we had to make a homerun hire. Had Mitch’s job not been on the line—and it absolutely was after the BCG debacle—I highly doubt Cal would have been the choice.

So yes. He deserves praise for the Pope hire. He got it absolutely right. But those who had concerns when Cal resigned were justified due to Mitch’s track record with MBB hires.
 
Pope was my first choice.
Ask my wife and 17 yr old son.
They both ridiculed me.
Now I make sure to let them know about my superior intellectual on the regular.
After the intro press event, even they were sold.
Signed,
A single one.
What did you see that none of the rest of us did?

How could you overlook the first obvious choice in Bobby Hurley?
 
prior to this year…

Blanton Collier (41-36) (21-34-3 SEC)

Charley Bradshaw (25-41) (11-31-2 SEC)

John Ray (10-33) (4-24 SEC)

Fran Curci (46-52) (24-31 SEC)

Jerry Claiborne (41-46) (13-37 SEC)

Bill Curry (26-52) (14-40 SEC)

Hal Mumme (20-26) (10-22 SEC)

Guy Morriss (9-14) (4-12 SEC)

Rich Brooks (39-47) (16-40 SEC)

Joker Phillips (13-24) (4-20 SEC)

Mark Stoops (73-65)


Anyone hating on the Stoops hire I feel is completely unjustified
He’s just a little above 50%. Eh.
 
He’s just a little above 50%. Eh.
Lol that was your takeaway? Stoops (and I must admit I’m not as happy atm) is without question near-peak level we could have expected at Kentucky, given the track record. Getting to just 50% hasn’t been done very often at all at the school and I’m saying we can just keep reality in perspective lol. I already see some of the comments in this thread and you can’t talk sense into some people. Lol
 
Love what CMP is doing so far but maybe we should wait a while before crediting or blasting the AD over this hire.

When I think of MB, Joker and BCG are hard to overlook. Tack on the ridiculous extensions to Cal and Stoops….woof.
 
Some ppl domt seem to understand he's an ATHLETIC director, not a "the sport i like" director.

And their rebuttal is always, "who makes the money" which is odd bc these ate usually the same ppl that hate momey in sports...or maybe it's just when certain ppl have it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Myotis
prior to this year…

Blanton Collier (41-36) (21-34-3 SEC)

Charley Bradshaw (25-41) (11-31-2 SEC)

John Ray (10-33) (4-24 SEC)

Fran Curci (46-52) (24-31 SEC)

Jerry Claiborne (41-46) (13-37 SEC)

Bill Curry (26-52) (14-40 SEC)

Hal Mumme (20-26) (10-22 SEC)

Guy Morriss (9-14) (4-12 SEC)

Rich Brooks (39-47) (16-40 SEC)

Joker Phillips (13-24) (4-20 SEC)

Mark Stoops (73-65)


Anyone hating on the Stoops hire I feel is completely unjustified
Wow! Stoops has more losses than any other coach on that list…
 
  • Haha
Reactions: B.B.H.
How long until the "Barnhart was forced to hire Pope" cries begin? Sadly this is not really sarcasm. That "bitter people" being discussed in the other thread as some of these folks. Barnhart is their version of "orange man bad." Nothing MB has done has made them happy.

Will any of them FINALLY agree that MB actually does know what he is doing. Is there a single one of us that had Coach Pope on their personal radar screen? Certainly not on mine. In fact, all of our teams in men's and women's sports are in good hands.

Can we start to appreciate that we are good hands with Mitch Barnhart?
2 coaches, 2 buyouts totaling $90 million and the BCG debacle. The answer is NO.
 
I largely do agree with you but don’t like that Mitch values all of the athletic programs so much. I’m admittedly of the “we are a basketball school” camp but I do think Mitch isn’t as bad as people say
Mitch has made coaching decisions that have made UK competitive in pretty much all sports. Now Football is the cash cow, basketball spends as much as it makes. The rest of the sports lose money but they are competitive in the conference which is what matters most to Mitch and UK.
Now he has been known to make some dumb azz decisions with contacts for a few goobers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainBoogerBuns
prior to this year…

Blanton Collier (41-36) (21-34-3 SEC)

Charley Bradshaw (25-41) (11-31-2 SEC)

John Ray (10-33) (4-24 SEC)

Fran Curci (46-52) (24-31 SEC)

Jerry Claiborne (41-46) (13-37 SEC)

Bill Curry (26-52) (14-40 SEC)

Hal Mumme (20-26) (10-22 SEC)

Guy Morriss (9-14) (4-12 SEC)

Rich Brooks (39-47) (16-40 SEC)

Joker Phillips (13-24) (4-20 SEC)

Mark Stoops (73-65)


Anyone hating on the Stoops hire I feel is completely unjustified
Stop it, you are depressing me. ;) It is sometimes hard to remember until you actually see the numbers just how bad we have been historically. Maybe it was just selective remembering because the pain was so bad.
 
  • Love
Reactions: B.B.H.
Love what CMP is doing so far but maybe we should wait a while before crediting or blasting the AD over this hire.

When I think of MB, Joker and BCG are hard to overlook. Tack on the ridiculous extensions to Cal and Stoops….woof.
Don’t forget Tubby, we got lucky on him leaving too.

Mitch didn’t get off to a flying start and his handling of the Joker fiasco was a PR disaster.

MDS, that’s the best they can do? I’ll get some tees made up.
 
2 coaches, 2 buyouts totaling $90 million and the BCG debacle. The answer is NO.
Again, Gillispie was nationally regarded as a very desirable up-and-coming coach prior to his tenure at Kentucky. Nobody questioned it at the time, he was thought to be an excellent hire. Only later did it become clear that the job was too big for Billy.

And Barnhart certainly didn’t keep him around too long, two seasons and he was out the door.

To give the devils their due, Barnhart wasn’t faced with a Calipari/Stoops contract situation because BCG was too stupid to sign his original one, let alone a big increase (not that Mitch ever contemplated offering him one).

I have little doubt Barnhart considers the Gillispie hire the biggest mistake of his career.
 
  • Love
Reactions: B.B.H.
Let's NOT forget Pope was not his first or second choice! Pope was the RIGHT choice but Mitch had to be turned down by multiple coaches to settle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crestcat
Again, Gillispie was nationally regarded as a very desirable up-and-coming coach prior to his tenure at Kentucky. Nobody questioned it at the time, he was thought to be an excellent hire. Only later did it become clear that the job was too big for Billy.

And Barnhart certainly didn’t keep him around too long, two seasons and he was out the door.

To give the devils their due, Barnhart wasn’t faced with a Calipari/Stoops contract situation because BCG was too stupid to sign his original one, let alone a big increase (not that Mitch ever contemplated offering him one).

I have little doubt Barnhart considers the Gillispie hire the biggest mistake of his career.
Only later? The signs were there.
 
prior to this year…

Blanton Collier (41-36) (21-34-3 SEC)

Charley Bradshaw (25-41) (11-31-2 SEC)

John Ray (10-33) (4-24 SEC)

Fran Curci (46-52) (24-31 SEC)

Jerry Claiborne (41-46) (13-37 SEC)

Bill Curry (26-52) (14-40 SEC)

Hal Mumme (20-26) (10-22 SEC)

Guy Morriss (9-14) (4-12 SEC)

Rich Brooks (39-47) (16-40 SEC)

Joker Phillips (13-24) (4-20 SEC)

Mark Stoops (73-65)


Anyone hating on the Stoops hire I feel is completely unjustified
Stoops was doing well with what he had when he had 2 star/3 star players. Not now. You can't tell me if rich Brooks had this talent he'd only have 4 wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainBoogerBuns
Really? I was not aware of any red flags concerning Gillispie prior to his being hired by UK.
There were not any. He was also the flavor of the moment...beating LilBro in the NCAAT. WE the fans, ran off Tubby. Look what it got us.
 
Really? I was not aware of any red flags concerning Gillispie prior to his being hired by UK.
That’s because there weren’t any. Gillispie was unquestionably a top coaching prospect at the time. Some people just can’t handle the massive spotlight at UK and Gillispie was one of those. If not for the drink, who knows he could have been good but we don’t have to wonder. We saw the train wreck occur at a furious pace in this life unfortunately. I don’t fault Mitch for a hire that almost any AD would have made back then.
 
How long until the "Barnhart was forced to hire Pope" cries begin? Sadly this is not really sarcasm. That "bitter people" being discussed in the other thread as some of these folks. Barnhart is their version of "orange man bad." Nothing MB has done has made them happy.

Will any of them FINALLY agree that MB actually does know what he is doing. Is there a single one of us that had Coach Pope on their personal radar screen? Certainly not on mine. In fact, all of our teams in men's and women's sports are in good hands.

Can we start to appreciate that we are good hands with Mitch Barnhart?
Pre-shaming.

Interesting technique.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT