He was out bounds
- Thread starter UKUGA
- Start date
May have been... may have got a toe in..
But how the hell do 2 refs right on the play not call the play dead due to stepping out even if they say he had a toe?
But how the hell do 2 refs right on the play not call the play dead due to stepping out even if they say he had a toe?
We’ve hit rock bottom when we’re complaining about the refs against an awful Vandy team.
There were multiple replays that showed him out = sufficient evidence.
It was so clear that even the announcers were discussing whether or not the helmet penalty would stand.
Nope. It’s almost perfect.
Kentucky “fans” who enjoy trashing our team have tinted vision in situations like this.
You're saying that from what you saw, there wasn't a chance that his right toe got down in bounds first? Not a chance?
If they'd called him out on the field, I don't think they would have over turned it either. It was that close.
You are probably right.
As I look at it, while the ball of his right foot is out of bounds, you technically can’t prove that it’s touching the white as his toe hits the green.
Bad call made by worse by rules of replay and the stupid penalty.
I don’t know if you’re drunk or what, but saying the refs got it right (which they did), is not trashing our team lol. Go sleep it off, buddy.
