ADVERTISEMENT

Harrison Barnes says UNC wins 2012 title if Marshall was healthy

they were softer than uk. the only reason they scored on us was because our defense wasn't where it was going to be. it's how all cal's teams trend. if it was up and down in the ff we would have scored 100 on them.
 
They lost to a very inexperienced, incohesive UK team with a healthy Marshall early in the season. UK had the entire season to gel and had become a machine by the time March rolled around. Marshall should stop sniffing his farts.
 
Hey Harrison

mrw-jennifer-lawrences-rep-says-this-is-a-flagrant-violation-of-privacy-the-authorities-will--photos-134392.gif
 
In his slight defense, what would you expect him to say? You think one of the twins would say "oh yeah Duke was the best team that year without question."

But we all know that UNC team was soft. We were #1 nearly all season and has the POY. You can say "would have" while the rest of us say "we did".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hotelblue
It's the biggest lie ever told. We already beat them with their roster healthy. We had the most dominant player in a decade.

There is absolutely no evidence to suggest they could have done it. They were soft and we were completely dominating by years end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: musrat59
UK was a ton better by the season end. It was a well oiled machine. The team was on a mission. MKG would not let that team lose, he was that X factor. Plus, Teague was playing as well as any PG in the county by NCAA time. One can say, he was the reason why UK reached its unbelievable potential and he was the weak link for half the year.

Oh, we also had some guy named Davis, who is a top 10 if not top 5 talent in the NBA right now...hmmmm
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotelblue
Well anything is possible. Kentucky could have beaten Wisconsin if a shot clock violation took away points from Wisconsin, they could have beaten Duke for sure with the Cousins/Wall team. I can say anything but that doesn't matter either.

The Wisconsin reference is a good one.
In sports, especially in a single game winner scenario, there is rarely a "this team WILL win". It is all about probabilities.
In 2015, Winconsin was a very good team, and a tough matchup for us. But if we played that game 100 times, I think we win at least 60, maybe 70 of them.
Likewise in 2012, UNC had a very good team, we need a Davis block at the buzzer to win in Rupp in December vs UNC. Clearly having Marshall would have helped their chances. Without Marshall, their chances of winning that game were 10-15%. With a healthy Marshall, I think those chances go up to 35-45%, still the underdog but much closer.
Regardless, injuries, and dealing with them, is a part of sports. Most successful teams have been on both sides of the injury bug helping/hurting them win a championship, most recently for UK (97 Derek Anderson, 03 Bogans, 15 Poythress). Probably the 12 Marshall injury helped our chances, but we still would have been the favorite w/out the injury. There are always other factors too, an opponent player having the game of his life, schedule difficulty or lack of (just look at the 10 Duke opponents), unbalanced officiating (17 UK-UNC, 15 UK-Wisc), & others.
 
Last edited:
One thing people forget about the December game Kentucky won on Davis' block: UNC-Cheats played a bizarrely unusual game for them, hitting 11 threes in 18 attempts. It was an experienced, cohesive team with all players healthy playing its best game against a group of freshmen and sophomores trying to jell. And they still lost.
 
UNC would have won the 2011 championship if Liggins hadn't broke one off in Harrison Barnes in the final 8
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aike and Mr_GG
If we didn't have a biased NCAA seeding process we would win it a lot more times.
If we didn't have horrible refs one siding calling against us we would have won it this past year.
Same thing back in 2015.
 
Harrison's opinion is just an opinion. I'm not sure if there has been a national champion in college basketball since 2012 that could beat that team..
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT