First, I have no bone to pick with the Zags. Few seems like a good dude, and in fact I'll be cheering for them - and hard - tonight.
But the media is on some sort of pro-Gonzaga crusade. Here's the lede of a front page story right now at Sports Illustrated: "Even if Gonzaga loses to North Carolina in the national title game, its Final Four run this year has proved once and for all to skeptics that the Zags are basketball royalty—no buts about it."
Who knew that a single Final Four automatically grants "royalty" status - and that it's beyond debate? I understand people want to crow a bit after all the doubting about Gonzaga this year - but that doubting wasn't without reason. Can we slow this a bit?
Here are the seeds Gonzaga beat on the way to royalty:
16 South Dakota St.
8 Northwestern
4 West Virginia
11 Gonzaga
7 South Carolina
Does that prepare a team to play a 1 seed? And is it worthy of such lofty talk?
(I will withhold my whine about how much UK would pay to face an 11 in a regional final or a 7 in the final four. Ever.)
But the media is on some sort of pro-Gonzaga crusade. Here's the lede of a front page story right now at Sports Illustrated: "Even if Gonzaga loses to North Carolina in the national title game, its Final Four run this year has proved once and for all to skeptics that the Zags are basketball royalty—no buts about it."
Who knew that a single Final Four automatically grants "royalty" status - and that it's beyond debate? I understand people want to crow a bit after all the doubting about Gonzaga this year - but that doubting wasn't without reason. Can we slow this a bit?
Here are the seeds Gonzaga beat on the way to royalty:
16 South Dakota St.
8 Northwestern
4 West Virginia
11 Gonzaga
7 South Carolina
Does that prepare a team to play a 1 seed? And is it worthy of such lofty talk?
(I will withhold my whine about how much UK would pay to face an 11 in a regional final or a 7 in the final four. Ever.)