ADVERTISEMENT

Global Climate Changes

China, India, Australia, Japan and Europe are investing by the billions in Renewable energy
China and India are still building new coal fired power plants that are +50 year assets. Their carbon emissions are rising not falling and they are the worlds biggest polluters. China is investing heavily in solar and battery tech because the want to dominate those world markets not because they are trying to reduce their emissions. The US has made great progress in lowering carbon emissions due mainly from switching from coal to natural gas (creates half the carbon) as our main electricity fuel.
 
Welp. Hockey stick fellar had a bad day. Don't worry too much. NGOs have paid his lawfare from the beginning.



The DC Court that heard the defamation case brought by climate scientist Michael Mann against two bloggers has ruled today that Mann and his lawyers acted in “bad faith” during the case, by presenting false claims on multiple occasions related to Mann’s grant funding:

"Here, the Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that Dr. Mann, through [his lawyers] Mr. Fontaine and Mr. Williams, acted in bad faith when they presented erroneous evidence and made false representations to the jury and the Court regarding damages stemming from loss of grant funding. . . The Court does not reach this decision lightly."

This ruling follows closely on the heels of the same court reducing the punitive damages awarded to Mann against one of the defedents from $1,000,000 to $5,000. That reduction follows the Court’s order that Mann pay $530,820.21 of legal expenses that his lawsuit resulted in for The National Review — which Mann had also sued, but whose case was dismissed.

Today things went from really bad to a whole lot worse for Dr. Mann.

In today’s ruling the judge pulled no punches, writing of Mann and his two lead lawyers:

They each knowingly made a false statement of fact to the Court and Dr. Mann knowingly participated in the falsehood, endeavoring to make the strongest case possible even if it required using erroneous and misleading information.








All of the background here:
 
Temperature-Historical.png


That's why you always use more data rather than less when more data is available. More co2 doesn't end life. There was actually more life on Earth when we had more co2. All plant life would die at 150ppm co2. How about we just say thanks to the oil industry for saving life on Earth.

Exactly. The law of large numbers is a law for a reason.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT