Girls 4th region game ends on free throw violation

[HeismaNole]

Metcalf County vs Warren East.

.5 tenths left. Warren East hits what would be the tying free throw yet ref waives it off because the girl behind the three point line didn’t wait until it hit the rim. Shit way to end a game.

 

[JwUKFan11]

I get it is technically the correct call. But something about that probably 50 year ref probably not calling that all year and then does that to that young girl seems terrible.

 

[Fitch44]

The only thing is…did that happen on other free throw attempts at all in the game and it wasn’t called?
If it did and they didn’t call it then that is BS to make the call at that point.

 

[TucsonCat]

Rules are rules. 30 minutes left or 3 seconds left.

 

[HeismaNole]

I get it is technically the correct call. But something about that probably 50 year ref probably not calling that all year and then does that to that young girl seems terrible.

Calling it despite it having no effect on the play is what bothers me. Such a stupid call made by someone who wanted to make the call.

It’s like calling holding in football opposite side of the field despite it not affecting the run.

 

[NBA-HD]

thats just a crazy bad take heismanole, it's a freaking rule, damn

 

[Lempface]

I don't mind it being called, it's the rule. Just a bad play by the violator, what's the higher percentage? Your player makes an unguarded shot or you heroically fly in from behind the 3 pt line and get a put back? Gotta be mentally tougher than that.

 

[HeismaNole]

thats just a crazy bad take heismanole, it's a freaking rule, damn

Yeah it’s a rule and so is stepping outside the coach’s box yet everyone would lose their mind if a toe was over the line and they called that under a second to play.

 

[UKUGA]

It’s the right call, and it needs to be made.

She’s trying to gain an illegal advantage.

Games are often won/lost at the margin on how well teams know and execute basic rules.

If the defensive player does the same thing and the shooter misses, everyone wants the shooter to get another attempt.

 

[wldktz8]

It’s the right call, and it needs to be made.

She’s trying to gain an illegal advantage.

Games are often won/lost at the margin on how well teams know and execute basic rules.

If the defensive player does the same thing and the shooter misses, everyone wants the shooter to get another attempt.

There is nothing gained with a made basket.

 

[UKUGA]

There is nothing gained with a made basket.

You can’t assume a made basket.

Hence the rule.

 

[jpbky2]

It's a violation, it needs to be called, but call all the violations. How many 3 second violations are there every game? How many times do players carry the basketball? How many times do defenders put their hands on the offensive player to change their direction? The game has turned into a game of just how many calls can we get away with if we just. continually break the rules.

 

[drew0422]

You can’t assume a made basket.

Hence the rule.

If she missed and that girl had an easy putback for the win should they call it? You call it when it happens, regardless of whether the ball went in. You always have to make that call, bonehead mistake by the player.

 

[JumperJack]

If she’d have put in a miss that came right to her, then people would be mad that it wasn’t called.

 

[TM2013]

Lame ending but that is a blatant line violation and must be called. When they were talking about it on KSR I thought it would be closer than that but the ref has to call that no matter what.

 

[UKUGA]

If she missed and that girl had an easy putback for the win should they call it? You call it when it happens, regardless of whether the ball went in. You always have to make that call, bonehead mistake by the player.

Right.

Surprised so many don’t seem to see this.

 

[bigbluedon]

Metcalf County vs Warren East.

.5 tenths left. Warren East hits what would be the tying free throw yet ref waives it off because the girl behind the three point line didn’t wait until it hit the rim. Shit way to end a game.

View embedded media

Easy call to make.

 

[bigbluedon]

I get it is technically the correct call. But something about that probably 50 year ref probably not calling that all year and then does that to that young girl seems terrible.

Disagree. That was blatant and if he hadn’t called that all year he shouldn’t be reffing. Nothing terrible about calling it. It is always the correct call.

 

[the nail at the foul line]

Rules are rules. 30 minutes left or 3 seconds left.

The ref from the game has spoken.

I rewatched. You made a good call

 

[bigbluedon]

The only thing is…did that happen on other free throw attempts at all in the game and it wasn’t called?
If it did and they didn’t call it then that is BS to make the call at that point.

That’s just a silly assumption. You are just assuming these refs are not doing their job. This is too obvious and a simple call to make.

 

[bigbluedon]

Calling it despite it having no effect on the play is what bothers me. Such a stupid call made by someone who wanted to make the call.

It’s like calling holding in football opposite side of the field despite it not affecting the run.

Are you serious? No effect on the play. If he lets it go I believe it tied the game. You have to call it. It a rule and the violation was as obvious as the nose on your face. It is nothing like the football comparison you referenced. You don’t get to pick and choose where you enforce the rules.

 

[bigbluedon]

There is nothing gained with a made basket.

The made basket is the advantage. What is wrong with you people? The girl violated and it should always be called. You all are too used to SEC officiating. Damn.

 

[HeismaNole]

Are you serious? No effect on the play. If he lets it go I believe it tied the game. You have to call it. It a rule and the violation was as obvious as the nose on your face. It is nothing like the football comparison you referenced. You don’t get to pick and choose where you enforce the rules.

First off, chill. Second, this game would’ve went to OT and been decided by the girls not a ref. The girl coming into the lane did not make the free throw go in. No advantage was gained by this so it’s exactly like my football example of holding on the opposite side of the field- calling a penalty for the sake of a penalty.

 

[HeismaNole]

The made basket is the advantage. What is wrong with you people? The girl violated and it should always be called. You all are too used to SEC officiating. Damn.

That girl could’ve been in the parking lot, it didn’t make the ball go in. 😂

Do you volunteer to give yourself a speeding ticket for going 56 mph in a 55?

 

[bigbluedon]

It’s a rule Heisman. The refs are not supposed to pick and choose when they enforce them. This play was not advantage - disadvantage like getting bumped on a rebound and no foul being called. This is a blatant rules violation and must be called. I have been reffing for 49 years and would make that call every time no matter when it happened. You are way wrong here.

 

[-BBH-]

It’s not like it was even close.

 

[bbncal02]

It's a rule in CBB too. You just never see it because it's a really dumb mistake.

It's a bit wonky that the players on the line can get into the lane before the shot hits the rim, but the other player can't. But that's the rule.

 

[bthaunert]

Calling it despite it having no effect on the play is what bothers me. Such a stupid call made by someone who wanted to make the call.

It’s like calling holding in football opposite side of the field despite it not affecting the run.

I’m kinda with you on this. My only issue is that it was so blatant. She was inside the logo by the time the ball went in. That’s probably 10 feet past where she is technically allowed by the rule. Had it been less obvious, it’s a definite no call for me if the shot goes in. I get it had no impact on the play but it was so obvious.

 

[Big BlueBeard]

That’s not even close. Have to call that.