The whole theory was, "we're not worried about what the other team is doing/does well, we're more concerned about what we're doing/what we do well."
So Cal and the team NEVER watched film? The whole season? Are you kidding me? I did not know that. I wonder what the strategy is there? "We're so good we don't have to watch film"?
Michael Jordan still pushing the myth that he was "cut" from his high school team.
The truth is Jordan, as a 5-9 high school sophomore, wasn't named to the varsity, while one of friends (who happened to be 6-7) did. Instead Jordan had to play on the JV team. The horror!
Link to Article with Background on Jordan being "cut"
Of course during the time when the media was busy building up the greatness of Michael Jordan this was a often repeated claim, resulting in harassment and public embarrassment for his old coach.
Now Markelle Fultz is spinning the same yarn about himself being "cut" and gullible sports writers are lapping it up.
I don't care enough to worry about it. Are you assuming that they watched film for 38 games and then abruptly stopped doing so for Wisconsin?
Also, another BS thing is how Cal doesn't watch the video.
Except, when you ask him before the game he knows everything about other team. You see this with every pre-game even meaningless team Cal has no reason to watch Videos for.
Probably is Cal makes statement that makes people over analyze and over react to shit and...from then on it just gets wayyyyy off reality.
No, they watch small clips that have been previously broken down by the coaching staff, about 15-20 minutes worth. He does that because the attention span of kids that age is limited, and as he says, after about 15 minutes they zone out anyway. They still get scouting reports and things of that nature, it just isn't the 2 hour film session that most coaches use. For this particular game, did there really need to be a lengthy film session? It was the same team they played the year before, and this particular team returned a lot from that match-up. Plus, do you not think these players watch other games during their season? Film study is not what got us beat, we simply didn't make the plays that we had been making the entire year. Film session had nothing to do with it.
No, according to multiple people at the time, including Cal IIRC, stated kentucy players had little prep and no film study on Wisconsin. I dont think Ive ever seen that approach before, and it's a mistake. I remember watching Frank use his little spin move during the game and it seemed not one of our guys guarding him were even looking for it. Too much to go back and show what I'm talking about, but it's there.
Making a claim that lack of prep couldn't have been a huge factor is wrong. You have no idea how much it might have changed the outcome. Our team in a five on five setting was beatable by several teams, yet we went about that final four like we were unbeatable.
I would be any amount if we had it to do over again, Cal would have them prepping more. He wont admit it, but it was a crucial mistake imo.
I believe this is correct. Staff watched and studied film and the team practiced and ran drills in accordance to the watched and studied film. Yep, that's how it went. I remember that now.No, they watch small clips that have been previously broken down by the coaching staff, about 15-20 minutes worth. He does that because the attention span of kids that age is limited, and as he says, after about 15 minutes they zone out anyway. They still get scouting reports and things of that nature, it just isn't the 2 hour film session that most coaches use. For this particular game, did there really need to be a lengthy film session? It was the same team they played the year before, and this particular team returned a lot from that match-up. Plus, do you not think these players watch other games during their season? Film study is not what got us beat, we simply didn't make the plays that we had been making the entire year. Film session had nothing to do with it.
ah.. Ulis did play..
3 damn shot clock violations in the last 4 minutes of a tight game is gonna get a lotta shade thrown at the point guard AND the coach if there's another capable pg available
Yeah but Lyles and Willie was responsible for two of those calls.
And I don't think that beat us even if he didn't play.
Yeah but Lyles and Willie was responsible for two of those calls.
yeah, my point is...its pretty annoying seeing people make up stuff to argue our losses. Its amazing what people fabricate on here to support their argument.
It's hard to really say who were responsible for these play. One was actually KAT who got stripped when he went to make his move. The stripped ball went to Lyles with little time left and he shot a out of control shot, which resulted in shot clock violation.
Other seems like they were trying to get the ball to KAT but couldn't really get him the ball, and in the last minute Andrew had to make a play happen. Which wasn't bad, he just missed the shot to the right. I think he was thinking lob.
I'd have to go back and watch the replay, which I've never done. I just remember being madder than hell at andrew and cal in real time. The way I remember it is they were trying to milk the clock and were taking too long to start looking for a shot each time down, but memory's a tricky thing so I could be wrong. I'd have to rewatch the game to be sure, and just talking about it is almost making me sick at my stomach.
I've been following UK Basketball for roughly 30 years and that Wisconsin loss was the hardest loss to take of any I've witnessed. UNCheat from last year ranks right up there as well. The way we got railroaded was just inexplicable. They basically gave the title to those cheating ****s last year. Still pisses me off.