maybe he hated "Happy Feet"Hates lazy walkers maybe?
Sorry for the inconvenience, but can someone explain what was actually said? I wasn't able to watch.
No pun but aTm does not have cheerleaders. Girl was with dance team. They have "yell leaders" and they are all boys. They are a strange bunch in CSBest thing about this game day is the brunette cheerleader that's 100 times more striking than Louise Amsi standing directly over Steven a Smith's shoulder at the round table discussion
No pun but aTm does not have cheerleaders. Girl was with dance team. They have "yell leaders" and they are all boys. They are a strange bunch in CS
Kinda but imo, it went more like this. An Alabama grad whose witnessed several Saban championships thinks UK fans expect more titles than what Cal has provided to date, one. Bottom-line, although we demand the very best, this is not college football and the NCAA Tournament is not the BCS or the football playoff by any stretch of the imagination.one panelist out of 5 suggested that with an nba roster, cal should of won a title last year
Go tell them that. They don't have "cheer leaders"!she's a cheerleader
maybe so, along with K, self, williams, dean, to name a few.Interesting that when the question is raised on here about whether Cal should have won more titles that posters go absolutely crazy at the notion. They talk about Cal's success and berate the poster that asks "Could he have done more". Almost like its the most ridiculous notion in the history of sports to say that Cal should have more than one title. Yet ESPN poses the same question.
Point is, regardless of how you feel about it, its not at all a ridiculous notion that Cal should have won more titles at UK. Although many on here hate ESPN and see a bias (which I totally get), they are the premiere sports network. If they are posing the question, there must be something to it. Anyway...
Actually it should be asked why Pimptino hasn't won more titles than one at UL. And why he didn't win more than one at UK.Interesting that when the question is raised on here about whether Cal should have won more titles that posters go absolutely crazy at the notion. They talk about Cal's success and berate the poster that asks "Could he have done more". Almost like its the most ridiculous notion in the history of sports to say that Cal should have more than one title. Yet ESPN poses the same question.
Point is, regardless of how you feel about it, its not at all a ridiculous notion that Cal should have won more titles at UK. Although many on here hate ESPN and see a bias (which I totally get), they are the premiere sports network. If they are posing the question, there must be something to it. Anyway...
How many should Dean Smith have won? How about Rupp? Look at all the talent John Thompson had. What about him? Your view is just an agenda. You are a Pitino dangler so you always want to view Cal in a bad light.Interesting that when the question is raised on here about whether Cal should have won more titles that posters go absolutely crazy at the notion. They talk about Cal's success and berate the poster that asks "Could he have done more". Almost like its the most ridiculous notion in the history of sports to say that Cal should have more than one title. Yet ESPN poses the same question.
Point is, regardless of how you feel about it, its not at all a ridiculous notion that Cal should have won more titles at UK. Although many on here hate ESPN and see a bias (which I totally get), they are the premiere sports network. If they are posing the question, there must be something to it. Anyway...
How many should Dean Smith have won? How about Rupp? Look at all the talent John Thompson had. What about him? Your view is just an agenda. You are a Pitino dangler so you always want to view Cal in a bad light.
In Cut-NETS view, pitino shouldn't be expected to win titles because he's not a great recruiter.Actually it should be asked why Pimptino hasn't won more titles than one at UL. And why he didn't win more than one at UK.
In Cut-NETS view, pitino shouldn't be expected to win titles because he's not a great recruiter.
And he cheated his way to his second title which should be vacated. Therefore he will have one non tainted title in his entire career.In Cut-NETS view, pitino shouldn't be expected to win titles because he's not a great recruiter.
Yep. Occasionally someone will compare Cal to Dean, and it's laughable. First, Dean didn't start over every year. Dean's kids stayed for the most part 4 years, always at least 3. That's how you have Worthy, Perkins and Jordan on the same team. Imagine if Cal had Randle, Towns and Murray together. Second, it took Dean 22 years to finally win a title, not 3......Nobody, and I mean nobody, did less with more than Dean Smith. He won 2 titles. Both with the other team making dumb plays to give the game away. Fred Brown throws the ball to Worthy when Georgetown has the ball in the last seconds and of course the famous "timeout" by Chris Webber.
He had Michael Jordan for THREE years and won one title.
Why no mention of Tom Izzo? Bill Self?
I bring up those coaches because they are HOFers. Cal does what he does with mostly freshman and with having to start over every year. Nobody does it as good as Cal. The fact that you harp on him for having only won one title so far, just shows your ignorance. You bash him because you are infatuated with Pitino who has crumbled before your very eyes. You cling to this pathetic view because you despise that Cal owns your hero and is a better coach than him. Only Rupp was more successful at UK.So if you bring up those coaches obviously in an attempt to find a parallel to Coach Cal in terms of having similar talent but being unable to "do more", why don't you defend them just as you do Coach Cal?
I will gladly say that Dean Smith and John Thompson should have done more. Absolutely they should have done more and they deserve the questioning and the criticism. I say this about Cal and you go defending him. Well if Smith and Thompson are the same, why aren't you defending them? Next...
I bring up those coaches because they are HOFers. Cal does what he does with mostly freshman and with having to start over every year. Nobody does it as good as Cal. The fact that you harp on him for having only won one title so far, just shows your ignorance. You bash him because you are infatuated with Pitino who has crumbled before your very eyes. You cling to this pathetic view because you despise that Cal owns your hero and is a better coach than him. Only Rupp was more successful at UK.
You are a POS Troll,why you aren't banned is beyond me,but I hope to never meet you in public,scum UL fanWish they would quit making Cal do what he does with just freshmen. I wish they would quit making Cal start over every year. Maybe thats what we should discuss; how its not fair that Cal is MADE to use mostly freshmen and MADE to start over every year.
It's not John Calipari's rules that allow freshmen to run to the NBA every yearWish they would quit making Cal do what he does with just freshmen. I wish they would quit making Cal start over every year. Maybe thats what we should discuss; how its not fair that Cal is MADE to use mostly freshmen and MADE to start over every year.
Interesting that when the question is raised on here about whether Cal should have won more titles that posters go absolutely crazy at the notion. They talk about Cal's success and berate the poster that asks "Could he have done more". Almost like its the most ridiculous notion in the history of sports to say that Cal should have more than one title. Yet ESPN poses the same question.
Point is, regardless of how you feel about it, its not at all a ridiculous notion that Cal should have won more titles at UK. Although many on here hate ESPN and see a bias (which I totally get), they are the premiere sports network. If they are posing the question, there must be something to it. Anyway...
The difference between Cal and Dean Smith;
Smith had Michael Jordan for four years
Calipari has Anthony Davis for only one
Sure enough. "If this were John Calipari, I mean, we're looking for some kind of consistency with this kind of thing", which was followed up with the comment that Pitino hasn't been named in NCAA violations. That said, what was left out is Calipari wasn't named in an NCAA violation at any point in his career either, and this field of issue is consistent with Pitino. His 2nd sex scandal in the past decade.
People want to say "Oh, Rick didn't know about all of that going on, he shouldn't be cited for it", but all the same, those same people Calipari should have known about Rose allegedly cheating on an SAT (and that was unproven), and Calipari should have known about Camby taking money from an agent.
If a person is going to do that, that person can't use that same excuse of not knowing for Rick Pitino, when funds are leaving the program mysteriously. That person can't use that excuse of not knowing for Bill Self, when he had a player just last season that took money from an agent, and that player even admitted it.
Absurd double-standard.
I wish you had some common sense. I wish you would just leave the site and stop pretending to be a UK fan. I wish you were as intelligent as you think you are. Your statements go beyond dumb. You hate that Cal is more successful at UK than your hero ever was. The fact that you are a fan of Pitino after all that has transpired that last few years only reveals that you lack the same morals and ethics he does.Wish they would quit making Cal do what he does with just freshmen. I wish they would quit making Cal start over every year. Maybe thats what we should discuss; how its not fair that Cal is MADE to use mostly freshmen and MADE to start over every year.