ADVERTISEMENT

Forde gets first question. Asked why players weren't named

NCAA lady basically just kept saying they work with the University to determine which games the ineligible players participated in. Gave no real insight. Eric Crawford couldn't get his answer out due to phone issue.
 
NCAA says the events took place before and after new penalty structure in place. Protocol in that case is to go w/ more lenient system.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">UOFL: &quot;The Committee on Infractions has gone too far and taken actions that are unwarranted. We will appeal.&quot;</p>&mdash; Jason Riley (@JasonRileyWDRB) <a href="">June 15, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">UOFL: &quot;The Committee on Infractions has gone too far and taken actions that are unwarranted. We will appeal.&quot;</p>&mdash; Jason Riley (@JasonRileyWDRB) <a href=" ">June 15, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Translation, they know banner is coming down. If not, they wouldn't contest it.
 
But didn't they specifically name Marcus Camby, Derrick Rose, and Reggie Bush in those Infractions Reports? Does anyone know if that is true? It just seems weird...
No. They referred to "Student-Athlete 1" or redacted the name. But since only one player was involved in each of those cases, everyone knew who they were talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G0BigBLUE00
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT