ADVERTISEMENT

First game hot takes

My hot take: Rob should start over DJ and/or be in the game in the last five minutes over DJ if it’s one or the other. I also think Sheppard deserves starter minutes, which he got as he was the most efficient guard for UK.

I’m also surprised by how many of you are getting bent out of shape over some controversial takes in a thread titled “first game hot takes.”

It’s like jumping in chummed shark infested waters and expecting not to get to bit.
Damn, now I have "Mack the Knife" running in my head. Thanks.
 
Not a hot take but we're explosive and fast. Gonna be a lot of big scoring runs on a lot of teams. Love the chemistry we're showing so early. The fact that we have 3 7 footers on the bench is crazy. I'm glad we're ranked lower than usual. It's gonna be a really fun season. We're due for one.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
My hot take is the same one I had this summer: Kentucky dodged a bullet not getting Hunter Dickinson and is a better team —faster, more aggressive, better balanced—without him.
I’ll wait until after the Kansas game to say that. However we did handle him last year, but had Oscar too. I like the construction of this roster though. Especially when Bradshaw and UGO return.
 
Dillingham is in the same mold of Wall and Fox: Guards that we can generally trust to get the job done and not disappear. It's something we haven't had in a few years, and I think he's going to quickly pass guys like Cason and TyTy.

Just feels like he's ready. He knows he can play at this level from day 1, and has next level ability. It's been a while since I've seen that from our guards.
Finally someone seeing what I know. He’s the best guard. He stands out and plays hard and to win EVERY play because it’s who he is.
 
Such a bad take for anyone leaving Edwards out of the starting 5.

That dude does so many things for us that don't show up in the box score. Wagner also- our starting 5 right now is great with 2 enormous spark plugs off the bench.

You misspelled Sheppard doing the things that don’t show up in the box score.

Dilly is better than Wagner at this point

Edwards is talented but out of control at times. He needs to play a lot.

Wagner threw up bricks his shit is suspect but we have others that can shoot.

1-5 from 3 and 0-1 FT

He will still start …

Biggest thing this team needs is at least 1 of the three headed monster.
 
RJ Barrett played a lot of bully ball and had success, no reason Edwards can't do the same. Comparable games.
He's not being matched up on players whom he can bully, at the moment. He's being asked (as someone pointed out earlier) to play more minutes at the 4 than he's comfortable with. When we get our bigs back and can move him exclusively to the wing, we may see more of him just taking his man to the rack and finishing over/through them
 
  • Like
Reactions: gharding07
The team is fun to watch. However, Wagner and Edwards are overrated. They can definitely help, but I don't see them carrying a team. I hope I'm wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: susan2361
Reeves is the 4th best backcourt player on this team and will see his minutes decrease as the season progresses.
Nope. Pay attention to teams that win a national championship… they can all shoot the 3. As a team almost every single one of them shoots at least 37% or better from 3. Reeves has to play a lot. He is and will be Kentucky’s best 3 point shooter
 
The team is fun to watch. However, Wagner and Edwards are overrated. They can definitely help, but I don't see them carrying a team. I hope I'm wrong.
They are both extremely solid freshmen players. If they both learn to play within themselves and not force the action then we will be a much better team as a result. At times both of them last night tried to make a play that wasn’t there or just forced up an unnecessary shot. Hopefully their learning curve will be quick as the potential is certainly there for both. They will both be good but we need them to be better than good to accomplish a special season.
 
My hot take is simply that Wagner is not our best point guard, nor should he be in the starting lineup.
Your hot take actually makes sense and is based on astute observation. Kinda confused on why you posted it here though. Seems to be a bit too thoughtful for RR. Btw, Wagner was pretty bad in the first half.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EliteBlue
Dillingham is in the same mold of Wall and Fox: Guards that we can generally trust to get the job done and not disappear. It's something we haven't had in a few years, and I think he's going to quickly pass guys like Cason and TyTy.

Just feels like he's ready. He knows he can play at this level from day 1, and has next level ability. It's been a while since I've seen that from our guards.
Cason was special, man. A different type of special, but Cason on the really good teams would've been unreal. He was just surrounded by subpar talent and no depth. And played about half the season banged up.

Dillingham reminds me a lot of BK. Their games are so similar. Both lightening quick, capable handlers, and have the ability to score in bunches. Cal figuring out how to incorporate both Wagner and Dillingham in the lineup together will be tricky. Idk what it is, but Wagner's game just bothers me. From what I've seen so far, he takes a ton of "my turn" shots. Just bugs the hell out of me.
 
Collectively the three freshmen guards are the smartest set of point guards Cal has had on the team at one time. By January with the usual freshman jitters and poor decision makings ironed out we will have three Ullis level basketball IQ guards with a Lamb like sniper in Reeves in the back court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gharding07
Cason was special, man. A different type of special, but Cason on the really good teams would've been unreal. He was just surrounded by subpar talent and no depth. And played about half the season banged up.

Dillingham reminds me a lot of BK. Their games are so similar. Both lightening quick, capable handlers, and have the ability to score in bunches. Cal figuring out how to incorporate both Wagner and Dillingham in the lineup together will be tricky. Idk what it is, but Wagner's game just bothers me. From what I've seen so far, he takes a ton of "my turn" shots. Just bugs the hell out of me.

Maybe so, but he wasn't on the really good teams at the end of the day. And, I'd say he never struck me as a real alpha-type guard that we have had in the past. Some of our best guards helped make our teams great, not just that they were on great teams.

No matter what we think of Cason and his talents, he's undoubtedly behind a plethora of UK guards in terms of sheer production and results. Wall, Knight, Teague, Twins, Ulis, Murray, Fox, SGA..

Dilly has a chance to be the type of guard we've been lacking since 2018ish.
 
Maybe so, but he wasn't on the really good teams at the end of the day. And, I'd say he never struck me as a real alpha-type guard that we have had in the past. Some of our best guards helped make our teams great, not just that they were on great teams.

No matter what we think of Cason and his talents, he's undoubtedly behind a plethora of UK guards in terms of sheer production and results. Wall, Knight, Teague, Twins, Ulis, Murray, Fox, SGA..

Dilly has a chance to be the type of guard we've been lacking since 2018ish.
I'm not sure he's behind Teague or the Twins. Those guys were surrounded by some great players. And deep teams.
 
I'm not sure he's behind Teague or the Twins. Those guys were surrounded by some great players. And deep teams.

But that's my point, in the end, the team around you, is the team around you. Was Cason given the same talent to win? Maybe, but I'm also not convinced the twins had a better situation in 2013/14. And if we want to go down this road, Ulis might have had the worst team to work with, which was basically just Jamal Murray and a bunch of bums (more or less, no offense).

Regardless, those guys were available, played well most nights, and helped the team to big wins and success. I can't in good faith put Cason above them.
 
My hot take is the same one I had this summer: Kentucky dodged a bullet not getting Hunter Dickinson and is a better team —faster, more aggressive, better balanced—without him.
This! I could not agree more! I was hoping all off-season that we somehow wouldn’t land that guy. He’s just not a winning player and he’s an absolute douche to boot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MdWIldcat55
Dillingham hunches forward on his shot, don’t like it. But get used to saying DILLY over and over. I hate it, but it’s way more convenient to say.
 
My hot take is that we will have the best backcourt in the country by February/March. Those three freshmen guards play some hellacious defense! The team as a whole seems to play real hard on every possession. Can’t teach that. GBB!
 
He absolutely will.

Barring injury to the other guards he will struggle to get on the floor.
Cal likely had to make promises to Reeves. Reeves will play the most minutes on the team this year. Will that reduce…possible but he will still play the most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gharding07
He's not being matched up on players whom he can bully, at the moment. He's being asked (as someone pointed out earlier) to play more minutes at the 4 than he's comfortable with. When we get our bigs back and can move him exclusively to the wing, we may see more of him just taking his man to the rack and finishing over/through them
Good point
 
It was fun not seeing them all just pound the ball inside. Was a lot more movement and easier for the guards to get to the rim. But we will need one of the 7footers for rebs and blocks as a long as Cal doesn't try to post up on every play.
 
what was the point of this?
It’s because all the people that talked 💩 about Reeves not being very good and saying we didn’t need him….they feel they have to double down on that. They are like flat-earthers.

And every time Reeves has an off game they will crucify him, even though he will be our only deep threat most games. Shepard, Mitchell, and Edwards occasionally will have a good game from deep.
 
Wagner shooting too many 3s instead of taking the ball to the rack, will be annoying.

Dillingham is FAST. But playing much more under control since Canada.

Edwards seems to lack a bit of a killer instinct (right now, could change) reminds me of Knox as far as demeanor.

Wagner and Edwards will be in foul trouble a lot if Cal can’t get them to move their feet on D, they reach and handcheck about like Peyton Siva.

Shepard is already the smartest, most well rounded player on the team. I hope we get him multiple years.
 
My two cents....
1. Sheppard is terrific and may turn out to be our best guard. No weaknesses.
2. Wagner appears to be rock solid with the possible exception of the 3 ball. A few clangers last night. He might lose some PT if we see a lot of zone.
3. Dilly is a taller, better shooting version of Sahvir Wheeler. Instant offense kind of guy. What I like about all three frosh guards is they pretty much have complete games.
4. I'm not as high on Thiero as others on the board. I haven't seen him finish very many plays...not convinced he's that good of an outside shooter. Did some great work on the boards though.
5. Edwards is another versatile guy who can do a little bit of everything.
6. Mitchell was OK but didn't impress me with his athleticism.
 
My two cents....
1. Sheppard is terrific and may turn out to be our best guard. No weaknesses.
2. Wagner appears to be rock solid with the possible exception of the 3 ball. A few clangers last night. He might lose some PT if we see a lot of zone.
3. Dilly is a taller, better shooting version of Sahvir Wheeler. Instant offense kind of guy. What I like about all three frosh guards is they pretty much have complete games.
4. I'm not as high on Thiero as others on the board. I haven't seen him finish very many plays...not convinced he's that good of an outside shooter. Did some great work on the boards though.
5. Edwards is another versatile guy who can do a little bit of everything.
6. Mitchell was OK but didn't impress me with his athleticism.
Please don't mention Dillingham and Wheeler in the same sentence again. 1 game into his college career, and already 20x the player wheeler ever was, is, or will ever be.
 
Funny how during the Canada games some of the fans were making Dillingham the whipping boy. Now he's the starting pg? Lol make up your mind people. I love Robs game btw.
Yes many were overreacting because they likely never watched much tape on him and or aren’t great evaluators. He’s special imo. Best talent on this team.

It’s early, but I feel he may be in the Fox/Maxey category.

Wagner and Sheppard are no slouches either. Better than we’ve had since Maxey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gharding07
Cal likely had to make promises to Reeves. Reeves will play the most minutes on the team this year. Will that reduce…possible but he will still play the most.
Cal will leave him on the bench if he goes 0/3 from deep to start a game and other guards are playing well. He just doesn’t do much else on the court. If he’s not scoring, particularly from outside, his defense and gunner mentality make him a liability.

Both he and Tre (0/3 this far) aren’t going to help much if they’re not hitting from deep.
 
Cal will leave him on the bench if he goes 0/3 from deep to start a game and other guards are playing well. He just doesn’t do much else on the court. If he’s not scoring, particularly from outside, his defense and gunner mentality make him a liability.

Both he and Tre (0/3 this far) aren’t going to help much if they’re not hitting from deep.
Disagree on Tre. He does so many other things well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crestcat
Couple of takeaways from a numbers standpoint

Just turnovers on 8.6% of their possessions. Pretty good given that normally this is a problem for freshman first half the season.

Just rebounds on 28% of our misses. Obviously the lack of big men hurts in this regard. But even when they do eventually play it might be a far cry from the numbers Oscar was helping put up.

Took a ridiculous amount of 3s. Again lack of big men might have been the reason but we took 44% of our shots from 3. That's a sharp departure from anything we have done in previous years under Cal. Unfortunately, we only shot 31% from 3 as opposed to 63% from 2. Maybe should have taken a little bit more 2s.

Played at an extremely fast tempo. Averaged only 14 seconds on offense.
Lack of big man presence is one of our ley weaknesses. The other one is we can't shoot from deep. If Calipari ends up not playing Bradshaw and Z then he needs to be shown the door.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Answer1313
Lack of big man presence is one of our ley weaknesses. The other one is we can't shoot from deep. If Calipari ends up not playing Bradshaw and Z then he needs to be shown the door.
I guess the bright side of one of those weaknesses is eventually we should have not one, not two but three big men. Hopefully anyways lol.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT