ADVERTISEMENT

Field of 68 Rob Dauster: Duke would have won the game if…….

They just ran out of time, patience and energy.

Why doesn't he explain why the cramps and the missed open shots occurred?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: blubo
It's a fair take to be honest, but to the flipside, if Kentucky dealt with transition defense and keyed in on Flagg's ISO earlier, they would've scored even more.

I do think we can kind think we are invincible since we beat Duke. We had some pretty awful stretches we can improve on. We did have some luck bounce our way.

But a W is a W
 
It’s a lazy take and one the media is running with to defend scheyer. What if Jaxson Robinson gets more than 1 point, what if Kentucky doesn’t miss a ton of open shots also. Kentucky can play the what if game as well. Anything to not give Kentucky the credit I guess
 
It's a fair take to be honest, but to the flipside, if Kentucky dealt with transition defense and keyed in on Flagg's ISO earlier, they would've scored even more.

I do think we can kind think we are invincible since we beat Duke. We had some pretty awful stretches we can improve on. We did have some luck bounce our way.

But a W is a W
Nobody thinks we’re invincible. There’s justified excitement throughout the fan base to see our team playing the UK brand of basketball we love.
 
went 6 of 24 from 3 instead of 4 of 24

Brick City Baby!!!

I could get out there right now at 58 and go 4 of 24.
 
3675372_0.jpg
 
It’s a lazy take and one the media is running with to defend scheyer. What if Jaxson Robinson gets more than 1 point, what if Kentucky doesn’t miss a ton of open shots also. Kentucky can play the what if game as well. Anything to not give Kentucky the credit I guess
What if the refs don't fall for duke's flops? Gifted them 6+ FTs.
 
Uk and Duke could do a 7 game series, in theory only. Duke wouldn’t make it past game 3-4 at this point in the season.
 
Lazy, one-sided take.

Why wasn’t Duke in better shape?

Why did their vets wilt in the second half?

What if JR played offense with a pulse?
Incredibly so, and biased to boot. It's fair to say given everyone healthy and both sides playing their absolute peak you think Duke would win, but trying to boil it down to one extra 3 and a guy not cramping... Without giving any credence to the opportunities the other team had to play better? Absolute joke of "journalism."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aike
If the Bulls didn’t have Jordan in the 90s. They wouldn’t have 6 championships.

If Tom Brady didn’t play for the Patriots, they won’t have won all those Super Bowls.

If Derrick Anderson doesn’t get hurt in 97 Kentucky has nine championships right now.

We can go on forever with the what if’s. Saying if you didn’t have X player or certain thing didn’t happen. Is the laziest way to make a sports take. How many injuries has Kentucky had over the years that would change the fate of a certain game or season?

Lazy reporting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BassProCat
It's a fair take to be honest, but to the flipside, if Kentucky dealt with transition defense and keyed in on Flagg's ISO earlier, they would've scored even more.

I do think we can kind think we are invincible since we beat Duke. We had some pretty awful stretches we can improve on. We did have some luck bounce our way.

But a W is a W
How in the world is that a fair take they’re basically saying if Duke would’ve scored more points they would’ve won…brilliant!
 
This is our best from top to bottom after 3 games:

Williams
Oweh
Carr
Brea
Butler
Robinson
Garrison
Krissa
Then the other 4

Those 8 can get us 9.
 
Last edited:
It's a fair take to be honest, but to the flipside, if Kentucky dealt with transition defense and keyed in on Flagg's ISO earlier, they would've scored even more.

I do think we can kind think we are invincible since we beat Duke. We had some pretty awful stretches we can improve on. We did have some luck bounce our way.

But a W is a W
Agree with all of that.
I think if we played Duke 10 times, they win 6, maybe even 7 of them. But we won this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KAB Cats
If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts, we'd all have a merry Christmas!

And truly, it's just a guess. He doesn't know. You know what I saw? I saw a UK team that was in the process of doing whatever was needed to win that game. When crunch time came, it was UK that was making plays and it was Duke's "phenoms" who were turning it over and dropping the ball out of bounds. They didn't even get a shot off on their last 2 possessions, not counting that heave at the end. So, let me sit with a couple UK guys and smile and say "I think UK would have won by 10+ IF they had just kept making threes like they were at the start of the game."
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDHoss and chroix
The guy who scored 10 pts in 23 minutes was not dominating, Rob. You can do the if this or that for every game. Dude comes off like someone who lost money on the game.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT