Maybe the fact that the ACC is the worst power 5 conference I can remember (imo) has something to do with those stats.
Coach of the year for a team that was preseason top 5, why would he get such an honor coaching in such a weak ass conference.
Stomped the conference? They won it by one game. Two teams were one game behind them.Scheyer seemed like an obvious choice. Duke stomped the conference.
Pat Kelsey won because Louisville went from 8-24 last season to 25-6. Coach of the Year awards tend to find their way to coaches with huge win improvements.
It's why Kelsey is a Naismith finalist for COTY and Pope isn't despite both coaches building teams from scratch and Pope's being better by every objective metric.
Yeah it’s a crime he’s not a finalist. Especially with what he dealt with all year injury wise.Scheyer seemed like an obvious choice. Duke stomped the conference.
Pat Kelsey won because Louisville went from 8-24 last season to 25-6. Coach of the Year awards tend to find their way to coaches with huge win improvements.
It's why Kelsey is a Naismith finalist for COTY and Pope isn't despite both coaches building teams from scratch and Pope's being better by every objective metric.
Duke won the conference by 1 game, Louisville and Clemson were in it until the end. I think Kelsey was the right choice. Tbf the schedules weren’t balanced and Duke’s margin of victory was silly. But anything that makes Duke fans mad makes me happyScheyer seemed like an obvious choice. Duke stomped the conference.
Pat Kelsey won because Louisville went from 8-24 last season to 25-6. Coach of the Year awards tend to find their way to coaches with huge win improvements.
It's why Kelsey is a Naismith finalist for COTY and Pope isn't despite both coaches building teams from scratch and Pope's being better by every objective metric.
Pope took a team that had a 23 - 10 record to a 21 - 10 season. I understand we had to rebuild the team and so did Louisville coach. In the eyes of the voters all they saw was 8 - 24 to 25 - 6. SEC voters did not see the win loss difference with Pope. Actually, I bet Pope could care less.Yeah it’s a crime he’s not a finalist. Especially with what he dealt with all year injury wise.
There is so ,UNC more to it than just the record though. He took a team many thought was nothing to be ranked the entire year, a 3 seed most likely with two major players and his backup pg out for the year. Just the record number of top 15 wins should get him a spot.Pope took a team that had a 23 - 10 record to a 21 - 10 season. I understand we had to rebuild the team and so did Louisville coach. In the eyes of the voters all they saw was 8 - 24 to 25 - 6. SEC voters did not see the win loss difference with Pope. Actually, I bet Pope could care less.
They most likely will.Man, I really hope they run into an 8/9 seed who just beats the crap out of them.
Same. If only to see the internet plastered with Flagg making droopy sad faces.Man, I really hope they run into an 8/9 seed who just beats the crap out of them.
If Lunardi is correct and they face potentially UConn the 2nd round that could be a tough matchup for them.Man, I really hope they run into an 8/9 seed who just beats the crap out of them.
👍👍Man, I really hope they run into an 8/9 seed who just beats the crap out of them.
UConn doesn’t match up well with Duke. Id take Duke by 12+ in that matchup. Duke needs to play someone with some nasty and grit to themIf Lunardi is correct and they face potentially UConn the 2nd round that could be a tough matchup for them.