As a hometown kid, you want to see him succeed. But, you obviously don't want him playing more than a couple/few minutes a game.This is just an honest question. I like Travis, and I hope the answer to this question turns out to be "yes", but ... I just don't know what to think at this point. I solicit all thoughts. And ... whatever ... Go 'Cats ! ! !
Worst thing that ever happened to Travis Perry was Reed Sheppard. There’s been a lot of - a whole lot - of 6’1 marginally athletic in state kids thru the years who scored a ton of points. The vast vast majority of them have had very limited roles at the D1 level. Reed was a unicorn. Travis was never going to be that, but a lot of folks had already pencilled him in
A completely apt observation about 6'1" KY high school players who scored a ton of points. I played against one of them, 1962-65 - Rich Hendrick, who played at Bristow High School in Warren County, just north of Bowling Green on U.S. 31-W. Rich scored 3,078 points his last two years at Bristow. He averaged 43 ppg as a junior and 44 ppg as a senior. Rich was better-than-marginally athletic. He played three years at WKU (when freshmen weren't eligible) - averaged 14 ppg in both his junior year and senior year at WKU. Richard is a great guy, now 68 years old and retired, living in Las Cruces, NM. Rich received the Kentucky High School Basketball Hall of Fame award in Lexington on March 22. But I digress from the topic of the thread ...Worst thing that ever happened to Travis Perry was Reed Sheppard. There’s been a lot of - a whole lot - of 6’1 marginally athletic in state kids thru the years who scored a ton of points. The vast vast majority of them have had very limited roles at the D1 level. Reed was a unicorn. Travis was never going to be that, but a lot of folks had already pencilled him in
Very good point about his shoulders. He will get stronger this off-season and it will greatly benefit him. I see him getting some playing time but I've always believed in Travis he has a very heady game and once the strength gets where it needs to be he won't be as a liability on defense. He knows how to take good angles and etc. I think he will contribute.Perry has a definable role. Barring injury, it’s to be a spot player against specific teams with limited minutes while he continues to learn the PG role.
As we know, few seasons happen without injuries. Consequently, he’ll get more unexpected minutes throughout the season.
But, we have a deep rotation of guards. I hope Perry sticks around, but would fully understand if he wants more minutes in the future. I do see a world where he’s the savvy veteran coming off the bench in years 3-4 that knows what Pope wants and gives a solid 15-20 mins a game.
Defense will be key to Perry’s minutes. Confidence is a huge part of defense regardless of athletic ability. He’ll have to become the nuisance type defender that isn’t afraid to bump and get physical. He’s needs to be physical for 2-3 dribbles that forces player to give up the ball. He’s got the broad shoulders to become this type of defender if he lives in the weight room.
Get better and stronger for 2026-2027.
(And be ready for reserve duty at PG, and zone-busting 3-point shooter in some circumstances.)
Yup, maximum strength without losing the stroke, get to the ball is on a string level handling, and sure eke out any additional quickness he can but mostly get strong with a rock solid ball control and he can be a productive contributor.He needs to focus on his getting stronger and quicker this offseason so he can hold his own a bit better on the defensive side of the ball. The fact he was forced into the rotation his freshman year bodes well for a potential role this year. Depends on what the final roster looks like. If we don’t get someone else capable of backing up the point and Johnson can’t be relied upon n that spot, he may have to be PG2.
This would be the MOST beneficial thing for him AND the team.Yes. Redshirt.
Hopefully he can use a redshirt year. He needs to physically mature a bit in order to deal with the competition level.This is just an honest question. I like Travis, and I hope the answer to this question turns out to be "yes", but ... I just don't know what to think at this point. I solicit all thoughts. And ... whatever ... Go 'Cats ! ! !
Worst thing that ever happened to Travis Perry was Reed Sheppard. There’s been a lot of - a whole lot - of 6’1 marginally athletic in state kids thru the years who scored a ton of points. The vast vast majority of them have had very limited roles at the D1 level. Reed was a unicorn. Travis was never going to be that, but a lot of folks had already pencilled him in
I think he’s gonna play quite a bit. Too much emphasis put on being a defensive stopper. So much of defense is team related. Everybody has their personal skills. His is offense and I think it will show.
His ball handling improved immensely as did his defense. Yeah he had trouble with some of the sec guards but who didn’t?
He has a high bball iq. Will be more relaxed and physically ready. He and Trent are late maturing guys. But both are hard workers and determined and that’s over half the battle. Hell the couch coaches on Rafters wouldn’t have recruited Dampier, Ford, Epps or Harden, but they got it done.
I’m not writing him off! Heard from many on here Reed couldn’t play at UK.