Last year the reason UK didn't in the tournament was because of sub .500 conference record...think Fla gets the same treatment if the same situation comes to pass? I say they get in and you'll see some BS excuse.
Last edited:
Last year the reason UK didn't in the tournament was because of sub .500 conference record...think Fla gets the same treatment in the situation comes to pass? I say they get in and you'll see some BS excuse.
I hope not. They have a road series with UGA this weekend which will be tough, but then it eases up a bit with UT and Mizzourah
OK guys, BUT wasn't the sole reason/excuse UK didnt get in last year was the fact we weren't .500 in conference? I distinctly remeber that they went down the list with the RPI(?) selected every team to UK, skipped them, and then took the rest of the teams and the committee chair said it was because we wern't .500 in conference. Just want your opinion if it happens to a school like Fla?
Do you remember what UK'S was last year getting passed over? Remember a big stink raised over it nationallyI imagine it is going to depend on how they finish. They are currently 9-12. They can get to .500 or better with their schedule. However, hypothetically, if they had a 13-17 record and lost in the first round of the tournament, then they probably won’t make the NCAA tournament. I think their RPI is already fairly low (30), and it wouldn’t get much higher with just 4 more SEC wins.
Do you remember what UK'S was last year getting passed over? Remember a big stink raised over it nationally