I love UK and only see and hear about UK football from afar. I devour the comments made during recruiting, spring practice, off season and watching UK games in person. I know I a lot more about UK's football team, coaches and schedule than 95% of the fans from the SEC of other teams. I also know I don't know as much about their teams. So, because of those facts, I wonder how fare of an evaluation UK gets when compared to other SEC teams from the people who make predictions. I think a few of the writers/talking heads do a good job - but most of them couldn't name you 5 players on our team in my opinion. That's why I think UK will have a better record than most of the people predicting the games. I feel they read the name Kentucky and automatically decide we will lose games based on our history - rather than our current roster. How do you feel?
Go Big Blue
Go Big Blue
