Controversial call at end of Pittsburgh vs Notre Dame game
- Thread starter twwilliams9
- Start date
The foul was called on Zach Austin for Pitt???
geezuz what a horrible call to end a game and season on.
Another absolute game ruining call at the end when they should have swallowed the whistle and let it go to OT. It would've been better that way, and actually fair. THAT WAS NOT A FOUL going for that loose ball. especially going for that rebound, ats the buzzer is about to sound, you simply don't blow that whistle for something like that after an entire game has gone by.
I don't know, but so many games are skewed, and it was 54-55 in a real ACC snoozefest. It truthfully makes me wonder who's wagering what on games where this is happening. That is ANOTHER example of a game changing result direct by blown whistle at the end of a game.
horrible.
NCAA should be blasted for allowing this to go on
geezuz what a horrible call to end a game and season on.
Another absolute game ruining call at the end when they should have swallowed the whistle and let it go to OT. It would've been better that way, and actually fair. THAT WAS NOT A FOUL going for that loose ball. especially going for that rebound, ats the buzzer is about to sound, you simply don't blow that whistle for something like that after an entire game has gone by.
I don't know, but so many games are skewed, and it was 54-55 in a real ACC snoozefest. It truthfully makes me wonder who's wagering what on games where this is happening. That is ANOTHER example of a game changing result direct by blown whistle at the end of a game.
horrible.
NCAA should be blasted for allowing this to go on
Pork belly Capel will never get an ounce of sympathy from me. Punk ass Capel, go eat a bag of di**s.
Would it be safe to assume you're not a fan of Capel?
Most incompetent on earth. Convince me otherwise.
Hopefully this crew just lost any chance at reffing the big dance
I hate Capel, and have no sympathy for him, he sucks. But that call was completely stupid.
New angle of foul on Caleb Love shows Arizona was fully robbed in loss to BYU
The Arizona Wildcats definitely got robbed in their 96-95 loss against BYU last night, not once, but twice. With about 17 seconds left in the game, the Wildcats
zonazealots.com
This was just a couple weeks ago. I'm sad I move back to Kentucky from living in Arizona, and see this... they didn't get jobbed once in the game. BUT TWICE. all right at the end. STUPID.
oops.
sorry. we were talking a crappy official ACC tournament call ? Damn, sad. My bad. It's an epidemic. Do they pass out masks before we watch this happen? Just keep it sterile on TV for safety sake.
People actually watching this MS level tourney?
They should have just invited Duke, ul and clemson and did a round Robin to determine champ.
They should have just invited Duke, ul and clemson and did a round Robin to determine champ.
Good thing refs can’t control the outcome of games! Pitt should have pulled themselves up by their bootstraps and whatnot.
I don't know but he seems to have left the door open for the possibility he might like him.
I feel like consistency is the real key in officiating. In a vacuum, that’s not the worst call I’ve seen. The Pitt player did have an arm in there that arguably impeded the putback attempt. The announcers reactions and comments about a “physical game” lead me to believe that similar contact or worse was allowed for most of the game though. That’s what’s unacceptable. You can’t call it loose all day, then tighten up in the closing seconds or vice versa.
Consistency is my biggest gripe about officiating all the time- call it close, let them bang each other, I don't care but call it the same way the entire game for both teams
They won’t call it the same way for 5 minutes stretches half the time.
While agreeing that this doesn't look like a foul, can I just make an observation here? That it's kind of hilarious the difference in what constitutes a shooting foul on the perimeter (you grazed his pinky finger 5 seconds after the ball left his hand! you were near his landing zone!) vs when you get anywhere close to the basket (suck it up, buttercup!).
Like, can we agree that if this same contact happened at the perimeter, strangely we wouldn't be shocked by a foul call? And does that make any damn sense?
I also am not really a believer in calling things differently just because of the time. That's illogical.
Like, can we agree that if this same contact happened at the perimeter, strangely we wouldn't be shocked by a foul call? And does that make any damn sense?
I also am not really a believer in calling things differently just because of the time. That's illogical.
Similar threads
