https://www.yurview.com/featured/2020-national-prep-championship-3-12-20/
Thought some people might like to watch these.
Lol at Clarke doing the opening tip. How many teams can use their shooting guard for that?
That’s an awfully predetermined scouting report. You may be right, but based on the entire game film posted in the actual thread I would say that’s completely off base. I just watched a guy go 3-5 from 3PT range and 9-9 from the FT line while going for 30+. A feat Hagans and Briscoe couldn’t pull off after 2 years in college let alone when they were in high school. Clarke is a Malik Monk level scorer with an all around more advanced game because he defends and rebounds as well.Thanks for sharing; it was great to see some proper film on Clarke. My early impression is that he is a very unique player. He's extremely dangerous attacking the basket. He has a good feel for direction and body control to get himself close to the rim, and once he's there, he usually finishes. When he doesn't, he's able to get back up to rebound his own shot or tip it in. Can play among the bigs at no disadvantage.
His shot is definitely not there yet. I could easily see him being a Hagans or Maxey type of 3-point shooter (<30%), and it's not out of the question that he could be a Briscoe-level shooter as a freshman. I don't know what his season average was, but a number of his jump shots were bad misses.
Has great court vision and is an extremely willing passer. He sees the open man and throws absolute bullet passes; I'll bet his assist numbers through the season are pretty good. I'm not sure he would be effective as a primary ballhandler, but he's perfect as a hockey pass guy. We play against zone defenses all season long, and I would love to see Cal plant Clarke right in the middle of those 2-3 zones, which is the part of the floor he's the best in anyway.
give some respect to Briscoe that guy was a great rebounder I believe he was averaging almost 11 a game in 2016, and one of the best finishers in the cal era. If he got it near the basket it was a bucket. And a pretty damn good defender had he stayed all 4 years we probably cut down the nets and beat auburn.That’s an awfully predetermined scouting report. You may be right, but based on the entire game film posted in the actual thread I would say that’s completely off base. I just watched a guy go 3-5 from 3PT range and 9-9 from the FT line while going for 30+. A feat Hagans and Briscoe couldn’t pull off after 2 years in college let alone when they were in high school. Clarke is a Malik Monk level scorer with an all around more advanced game because he defends and rebounds as well.
Did anybody even watch the game?
I’m not hating on Briscoe, he was great at everything you mentioned. He’s no Terrence Clarke though.give some respect to Briscoe that guy was a great rebounder I believe he averaging almost 11 a game in 2016, and one of the best finishers in the cal era. If he got it near the basket it was a bucket. And a pretty damn good defender had he stayed all 4 years we probably cut down the nets and beat auburn.
for sure Clarke will be a top 5 guard in the cal era based on what i’ve seenI’m not hating on Briscoe, he was great at everything you mentioned. He’s no Terrence Clarke though.
Meyer said that Clarke was the best SG he’s ever scouted....Clarke's skill set screams that he needs to come in as a defensive phenom first and foremost. Type of player we have seen before that can be great if he starts with defense. Good at going to the basket, he could have a positive start from the get go if he focuses on those two things while he gets acclimated to everything else.
That would mean he is a great shooter. When we see 'SG' shooter comes to mind first. Maybe he is, just not what I have read. Hope he is because outside shooting will be our only real question mark. He could be great and not be a great shooter. I am thinking in terms of winning the championship. I know as we get deeper in the tournament backing off our outside shooters is what the better coaches will do when they are out talented. The reason I hope we Williams because he is a proven shooter with experience. Probably wouldn't fold under pressure. If Meyer is right I for sure like our chances with the depth we will have.Meyer said that Clarke was the best SG he’s ever scouted....
give some respect to Briscoe that guy was a great rebounder I believe he was averaging almost 11 a game in 2016, and one of the best finishers in the cal era. If he got it near the basket it was a bucket. And a pretty damn good defender had he stayed all 4 years we probably cut down the nets and beat auburn.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/247spo...d-Kentucky-Wildcats-reclassify-135185234/Amp/Meyer said that Clarke was the best SG he’s ever scouted....
yeah, close enough!
He was forced to play out of position at UK. Briscoe is best suited as a distributing PG. Honestly, he did well to adapt off the ball with his shooting.Briscoe was one of the poorest fits of any recruit we had here under Cal.
He was forced to play out of position at UK. Briscoe is best suited as a distributing PG. Honestly, he did well to adapt off the ball with his shooting.
Focus, intensity and ball handling really excite me. Thought he was going to be the two but guess Boston will be the two and Clarke the three. Sounds perfect for the three with his skills. Sounds like he could be the ball handler at times.http://www.nbadraftroom.com/p/terrance-clark.html?m=1
The players he’s compared to doesn’t suck to say the least
It's amazing. Briscoe is one of the most selfless players in the Cal era. He played out of position not one year, but TWO, because that was what was best for the team. And yet, he gets nothing but grief from the vast majority of the fanbase.
He was forced to play out of position at UK. Briscoe is best suited as a distributing PG. Honestly, he did well to adapt off the ball with his shooting.
It's amazing. Briscoe is one of the most selfless players in the Cal era. He played out of position not one year, but TWO, because that was what was best for the team. And yet, he gets nothing but grief from the vast majority of the fanbase.
Lol I guarantee you he is much more naturally talented offensively than defensively and he will be a good defender.Clarke's skill set screams that he needs to come in as a defensive phenom first and foremost. Type of player we have seen before that can be great if he starts with defense. Good at going to the basket, he could have a positive start from the get go if he focuses on those two things while he gets acclimated to everything else.
lol , a distributing point guard has to pass the ball . Briscoe pictured himself as more of a James Harden type to me .He was forced to play out of position at UK. Briscoe is best suited as a distributing PG. Honestly, he did well to adapt off the ball with his shooting.
lol , a distributing point guard has to pass the ball . Briscoe pictured himself as more of a James Harden type to me .