Of course, if we started our best players, Reeves would have had an opportunity to play with Reed and Rob for additional minutes. Instead, because we don't, we risk Cal fouling out our lowest foul rate player with 2 fouls in the first and losing time for the Big 3 to play together.
The 2 foul rule should not be set in stone, game situations need to be considered. Also third foul in the second half, when you're in a one and done tournament you can't be inflexible.
Yes. And WWW. That's how he got Dejuan in the first place is thru WWW. WWW is Dejuans godfather. So that makes Cal even a step more into knowing that he has to stick with DJ even if he didn't truly want to in his heart. That's kind of the way I feel about it anyways.
Bobby Knight used to say if you cannot win without a player you must keep him in regardless of fouls . I saw him play Isiah Thomas with two fouls in first half for eight minutes . both the announcers and I thought he didnt realize Thomas had two fouls . what I said above was his explanation . Reeves did not foul out so we left time he could have played on the court unused .
Didn't make me mad, he put him back lin like 60 seconds later and Reed nailed two threes. He pulled him, talked to him, settled him, and put him back.
This in response to the Sean Vinsel tweet about the three Rs playing the last 4 mins together despite not playing together a lot before then.
Was limited in part to Reeves 3rd foul. Which was a very tricky-tack call considering TAMU was beating the crap out of us when we had the ball.
