I'm good with the rankings - thought they'd put us around #8. Probably should've been at #5 to start the season - but hindsight is 20/20
I never thought we would stick around that high in the polls. But I did think a win over Duke on a neutral floor would hold more weight than a true road loss at UCLA.
Only thing worse than that is a dirty bird hanging on every word.You all are arguing about whether or not you should be ranked 3rd or 5th in early December? Good god.
arguing about being ranked 3rd or 5th in early December beats the hell out of being 3rd or 5th in Minardi Hall.You all are arguing about whether or not you should be ranked 3rd or 5th in early December? Good god.
I'll take it. Because we certainly aren't playing like a top five team.
You forgot to mention that Cal didn't sleep well the night before the game.Not just that but Ulis, Lee and Poy were not at 100% for that game.
It looks like the pollsters took all of that into consideration as they should have.
Watch what we do to Eastern on Wed. night and then watch what we do to ASU on Sat.
Barring injuries or set backs to guys banged up I predict we blow both of them out of the gym.
uhh.... Kansas no good? Michigan state a joke at #1? What the hell are you smoking? This year it's wide open man, there's not a dominat team out there .. Well except UK ( around March ) other than that, those teams deserve to be at the top right now and really who cares... You can be #1 all year but it really comes down to March and that's all that matters my friend..I agree, we should be about 3. 5 is too low. Kansas is no good. Michigan St. a joke at #1. How does a Louisville move up after losing a 13 pt 1st half lead, what an F-n joke.
Man, you aren't biased one bit.I agree, we should be about 3. 5 is too low. Kansas is no good. Michigan St. a joke at #1. How does a Louisville move up after losing a 13 pt 1st half lead, what an F-n joke.
Exaggerate much? Nobody said this team is /was better than last year's team and nobody said that they are worse than the 13 team. Get a grip.We lose one game and everyone around the country goes from us being better than last years team, to our worst team since the NIT team. Go figure
I think you are putting too much of a positive spin on this years team at this point in the season. This team has gaping holes in it's game right now snd the last thing we want is to compare UK to KU or MSU. Yes we beat Duke but since then we have showed we have a lot of warts. We definitely are not "much better than the teams that are ahead of us". Pump the brakes. We got a gift by getting the #5 spot in the rankings. We lost to a 3 loss team that is poorly coached and doesn't have tge talent we have. We should be ranked in the 7 or 8 spot IMO.I agree Jiggy, that is my point, we travel across country to play on a Thursday night 3 time zones away (don't get me started on that), this was a classic set up game for a loss. Not saying 5 is not warranted, just that I believe we are much better than the teams ahead of us when all things are equal. The Duke win, should have more merit. Like I said, you hear people say, this team is more of a team than last year after that game. Now after this game, this club is soft, they aren't good and will be the worst team since the 13 club
Excuses excuses. We lost to a bad team. Look what they did to UNC** after they lost a true road game without their best player/point guard. They dropped UNC** to 9 from 1.Not just that but Ulis, Lee and Poy were not at 100% for that game.
It looks like the pollsters took all of that into consideration as they should have.
Watch what we do to Eastern on Wed. night and then watch what we do to ASU on Sat.
Barring injuries or set backs to guys banged up I predict we blow both of them out of the gym.
Duke also won on the road at Wisconsin before the Miami debacle. That goes a long way on the confidence scale.Last year Duke got their asses handed to them against Miami losing by a larger margin than we did to UCLA. They won the national championship, so an early or even mid-season loss or two isn't the end of the world if you see improvement. Kentucky looked awful against UCLA, and as I had posted after South Florida, that despite crushing them, we were losing a lot of rebounds in the second half to a marginal team that was dominating us in the paint. So, there were and perhaps still some flaws to this current team. I don't disagree with Booker's post either that we are soft, which might have been done to motivate the team.
Yes.You all are arguing about whether or not you should be ranked 3rd or 5th in early December? Good god.
Perfect post. How anyone thinks we got shafted by getting the 5 spot in the rankings is laughable. We have looked really bad in every game since the duke game. We looked awful Thursday night, "High school ball at best" is a good way to describe what we saw from UK.Guys. We aren't a top 10 team. We may be by March but how they played Thursday was high school ball at best. Have to learn to do more than rely on dunks/lobs, have to rebound and defend.
I hope we figure out what to do if the other teams clog the lane again
Well done sir.You forgot to mention that Cal didn't sleep well the night before the game.
The gym was too hot during the shootaround.
Skal is still have lingering effects from that earthquake.
Willis slipped off to the nearest Indian reservation to visit his kinfolk.
Humphries lost his stuffed Koala bear.
There was no way we shouldn't still be #1 if the voters was privy to all this info as to why we couldn't beat an unranked team that lost to Monmouth.
You forgot to mention that Cal didn't sleep well the night before the game.
The gym was too hot during the shootaround.
Skal is still have lingering effects from that earthquake.
Willis slipped off to the nearest Indian reservation to visit his kinfolk.
Humphries lost his stuffed Koala bear.
There was no way we shouldn't still be #1 if the voters was privy to all this info as to why we couldn't beat an unranked team that lost to Monmouth.
Well done sir.
The excuses from some of our fans are hilarious.