OP is a Louisville fan. The two situations aren't remotely similar anyway.Who cares?
What Cal seems to have the most problem with is coaches keeping a recruiting board of Grad Transfer targets during the season.
True. And although a coach would never admit it, as it's probably an NCAA violation (contacting them in any way would be), there are always rumors that probably swirl about these kids and certain schools/coaches are tracking these rumors and waiting to pounce.
Vanderbilt is probably not going to be a back-up for anyoneGreen, Diallo, and Johnson backed up by Shai, Baker, and Vanderbilt gives us one of the top few backcourts in college basketball, if not the best...
In my completely worthless opinion as always
In my opinion, yes. Just because a college plays in the P5 they are not automatically a major school/team. Some may classify colleges that way, but I don't. Conference affiliation should not be the major factor.@LeonThe Camel Ask yourself this question: Is Pitt a mid major? Nope. Simple.
Careful getting too close to my opinion, You will be labeled a troll and Louisville fan soon.Personally, I think it's pretty hypocritical of Cal to take this stance. I don't disagree with Cal often but I do here. Coaches can leave and do leave for other jobs when they get a better offer, so why shouldn't the player be able to up grade once they've built their resume as well. Doesn't make sense why someone would dislike this rule, especially a coach who is as player minded as Cal.
It is not outrage, it is a question. Apparently it stirred up a hornets nest.I think grad transfer is fine. It rewards a guy for putting in work in the classroom. Cal doesn't like it because of "tampering" with mid major talent by the high major programs. That's simply not the case with Cam. He was at a high level program, went through a coaching change and got it done in the classroom. I fail to see the outrage Leon... sign him up and let's win some ball games!
Define mid-major.Pitt is not a mid major, are you kidding me lol
Not only are you a troll, you are also an idiot.Define mid-major.
Like I said, I do not think a program is a major program simply because they in a P5 conference. Nor do I think a program is excluded from being a major if they are not in a P5.
Really?
Anyone else confused about his recruitment. A couple of years back Cal made a stink about graduate transfers, namely Louisville taking a player that cost Bruiser his job.
If we sign Johnson, isn't that the same thing.
Noooooooooooooooo.
What Cal objected to was the process, the rule, that allows graduate transfers to not have to sit out a year making it more encouraging for them to transfer, AND that some coaches/schools would go in and "recruit" (hey, let Leon know that if he were to graduate and transfer then State-U would be interested) such players before they have decided to leave the school, ESPECIALLY the situations where good players from mid-majors would leave to go to major conference schools (the Bruiser example fits here).
1) Cal has also stated how much he hates the NBA-rule that allows and encourages the OAD. But he clearly has adopted that, and recruits those players. Why? Because it is in their (the players) current best interest, and it helps him to get the best players. You can be against that something is allowed, and not be a hypocrite for taking advantage that it is allowed. What you shouldn't do is say you are against the rule, and then do things to encourage the rule to continue.
2) Cam has already said, I'm outta here (Pitt). Cal did not encourage him to leave.
3) PITT is NOT a mid-major, they are an ACC school, so the "little guy" is not losing a player, this alone make this very different from the Bruiser scenario.
4) Cam is transferring from a school with a new coach. He gave Stallings one-year, and apparently Stallings wasn't for him. Stallings did not recruit Cam to PITT.
Yeah, really. I have no idea what you were talking about. Did I miss something?
How does it feel to be stupid?In my opinion, yes. Just because a college plays in the P5 they are not automatically a major school/team. Some may classify colleges that way, but I don't. Conference affiliation should not be the major factor.
Where do you place Gonzaga. Wichita St. Xavier. Teams that have had 10 or more years of recent success. Compare those teams to P5 programs that have never had success, Ole Miss, Virginia Tech, Kansas St, Cal, Penn St.
So I do think of Pitt as a mid-major in a major conference. Cinci has a better program.
How did it cost Bruiser his job? I assume you mean bruiser flint? If not then nevermind. I just want to learn more about that guy.Anyone else confused about his recruitment. A couple of years back Cal made a stink about graduate transfers, namely Louisville taking a player that cost Bruiser his job.
If we sign Johnson, isn't that the same thing.
Good answer. We agree on everything except Pitt being a major program.
Pitt has been to 1 FF, in 1941. I simply cannot make a claim that they are a major player just because they are in the ACC.
This kid could really complete this class, especially if we get Bamba. He can shoot it, handle it, and is very athletic. He could allow Vanderbilt the time to develop as a true 3.
So he was saying it is not acceptable when Louisville does it, but it is ok for us.
Actually he bailed for Louisville.johnson wasn't recruited by stallings and is part of a mass exodus
the drexel kid was the best player in the program, and bailed on his teammates for greener pastures
johnson wasn't recruited by stallings and is part of a mass exodus
the drexel kid was the best player in the program, and bailed on his teammates for greener pastures
Why you keep worrying about Johnson? Anybody would want him. Why should some of the rogue schools take advantage of a need yet we can't? Things change what's the big deal? Obviously this guy would only up our chances of winning it all.Anyone else confused about his recruitment. A couple of years back Cal made a stink about graduate transfers, namely Louisville taking a player that cost Bruiser his job.
If we sign Johnson, isn't that the same thing.