I saw some tweets about this and thought it would be an interesting discussion here. Not looking to pile with Cal because he clearly had some magic from mid 90s through late 2010s but it’s insane to me that his coaching tree is so barren.
Josh Pastner is his most successful assistant in terms of HC success and I would not categorize him as a Cal guy given he was on staff for one year.
After that you have Payne, Barbee, Antigua, Flint, Kellogg… no offense to those guys but I don’t even think you could categorize them as even mediocre head coaches.
So how does one of the most successful coaches in this era not have any coaching tree to speak of? I don’t think “he only won because of talent” is it, although that’s part of it. To me it probably points to his something in his personality or DNA and not giving up control on anything with his programs, stunting the growth of his assistants.
Would love to hear some thoughts/theories on this because I think it’s a pretty glaring anomaly that says something (what I don’t know) about Cal, for better or worse.
Josh Pastner is his most successful assistant in terms of HC success and I would not categorize him as a Cal guy given he was on staff for one year.
After that you have Payne, Barbee, Antigua, Flint, Kellogg… no offense to those guys but I don’t even think you could categorize them as even mediocre head coaches.
So how does one of the most successful coaches in this era not have any coaching tree to speak of? I don’t think “he only won because of talent” is it, although that’s part of it. To me it probably points to his something in his personality or DNA and not giving up control on anything with his programs, stunting the growth of his assistants.
Would love to hear some thoughts/theories on this because I think it’s a pretty glaring anomaly that says something (what I don’t know) about Cal, for better or worse.