ADVERTISEMENT

Brea

Why does hesitate to shoot so often
So many people thought that getting Brea from the portal was the answer and the missing piece to push this roster over the edge. They claimed that he was the instant offense, the bucket-getter, and the playmaker we failed so many times before him to get. There were reasons why almost every team that were his finalists dropped out of the race for his services. They also knew he was limited and one-dimensional. Don't get me wrong, the kid is a pure shooter and nobody can take that away from him, but there's also a reason why he isn't even starting on this team. I think people's expectations of Brea were way too high. Is Brea a world-beater? No. Can he be a great role player that can occasionally make it rain? Yes.
 
Brea is what he is. He would be most effective if he had teammates around him that can penetrate and finish in the paint, thus forcing help defense to decide to help in the paint or stay on Brea at the 3 point line. Unfortunately this squad is generally lacking in this regard, so it’s more of an usual circumstance when Brea finds himself open, rather than us putting pressure on the defense to make a choice, Given the right personnel and skill sets surrounding him, Brea would be a huge problem for opposing defenses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HYTCHYE ISLAND
The dude really has trouble finding open looks. Defenses have learned to keep him smothered on the perimeter and he’s not athletic enough to create his own shot.
Gonna show my here but the most unathletic guy who just killed you in college was Steve Alford. IU ran so much action/screens to get him a look because he was a great shooter. Wish UK would try to run more screens/action for Brea.
 
So many people thought that getting Brea from the portal was the answer and the missing piece to push this roster over the edge. They claimed that he was the instant offense, the bucket-getter, and the playmaker we failed so many times before him to get. There were reasons why almost every team that were his finalists dropped out of the race for his services. They also knew he was limited and one-dimensional. Don't get me wrong, the kid is a pure shooter and nobody can take that away from him, but there's also a reason why he isn't even starting on this team. I think people's expectations of Brea were way too high. Is Brea a world-beater? No. Can he be a great role player that can occasionally make it rain? Yes.
I'm one of those whose expectations were higher for him. Now, I'm used to him not showing up in most games. He just isn't what we hoped he would be when we signed him. He'll have the occasional hot game but defenses are finding it easy to stop him.
 
Started off as a favorite of mine , dude was so on fire , seems like he didn’t miss his first month as a Wildcat , now he seems to have quit working as hard to get shots . And his defense is nonexistent. Doesn’t like any physicality at all . He’s tied with Jax for the softest player on a fragile team .
 
Started off as a favorite of mine , dude was so on fire , seems like he didn’t miss his first month as a Wildcat , now he seems to have quit working as hard to get shots . And his defense is nonexistent. Doesn’t like any physicality at all . He’s tied with Jax for the softest player on a fragile team .
And the crazy part is that if he actually worked on his D, he lands on an NBA roster. I can’t imagine not putting in the work.
 
Loved playing against guys like him at the local gym .. you get to shoot / score all you want — and he shoots / scores all he wants . The games to 25 ( by 2s and 1s ) goes by jet quick
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK90
Gonna show my here but the most unathletic guy who just killed you in college was Steve Alford. IU ran so much action/screens to get him a look because he was a great shooter. Wish UK would try to run more screens/action for Brea.
Yep, good memory. Alford was one of the best ever at figuring out how to get open looks despite being really slow, short and constantly double covered. Dude was like a perpetual motion machine running off those screens.

But nobody today screens away from the ball as much as those old IU teams did. And I doubt Brea has the stamina for that level of constant movement even if they did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fisherscatfan
Referring and coaching games I have seen probably few thousand players. After Steph Curry made 3 point shooting cool…you will see 2/3 of them taking 3s from everywhere from 5 grade all the way to high schools and college. Doesn’t matter if the shot is good, if he is a good shooter, if a teammate is open . Also does not matter that he cannot shoot the FT or make a simple layup with each hand consistently…..

Brea is also one of these kids that want to be like S. Curry …. Difference is he never developed other skills: dribbling, shooting around the basket, scoring in various ways….. he is limited so is not going to S. Curry.

When I was coaching , I always telling my players, you will need 2 reliables moves to score to start with. Then for each of them you need to develop 2 counters. That will give you 6 ways to score not counting FT ( they are called free for a reason)….

Do you know how many FT Brea took so far? 71 !! . Think about this he took 71 FT….and guess what …. those are numbers for his entire college career….. 71 FT!!!! That’s it 71 !!!

In comparison he took about 624 3s…. Yes he made 275 of them so about 44%…. But think about that in 4 and half years of college only took 71 FT….. at Kentucky in 18 games he had 10 FT. For comparison Butler took 71 FT as well but those are only at Kentucky….

So if you except Brea to be something else than what he already is …. Ain’t happening !
 
Last edited:
Referring and coaching games I have seen probably few thousand players. After Steph Curry made 3 point shooting cool…you will see 2/3 of them taking 3s from everywhere from 5 grade all the way to high schools and college. Doesn’t matter if the shot is good, if he is a good shooter, if a teammate is open . Also does not matter that he cannot shoot the FT or make a simple layup with each hand consistently…..

Brea never developed other skills: dribbling, shooting around the basket, scoring in various ways….. he is limited.

When I was coaching , I always telling my players, you will need 2 reliables moves to score to start with. Then for each of them you need to develop 2 counters. That will give you 6 ways to score not counting FT ( they are called free for a reason)….

Do you know how many FT Brea took so far? 71 !! . Think about this he took 71 FT….and guess what …. those are numbers for his entire college career….. 71 FT!!!! That’s it 71 !!!

In comparison he took about 624 3s…. Yes he made 275 of them so about 44%…. But think about that in 4 and half years of college only took 71 FT….. at Kentucky in 18 games he had 10 FT. For comparison Butler took 71 FT as well but those are only at Kentucky….

So if you except Brea to be something else than what he already is …. Ain’t happening !
I'm not understanding the math here.
 
Yep, good memory. Alford was one of the best ever at figuring out how to get open looks despite being really slow, short and constantly double covered. Dude was like a perpetual motion machine running off those screens.

But nobody today screens away from the ball as much as those old IU teams did. And I doubt Brea has the stamina for that level of constant movement even if they did.
Yea. Alford’s conditioning had to excellent. The moving screens would be called but Pope needs to figure out how to get this guy shots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK90
I'm not understanding the math here.
When you take 624 3s and only 71 FT over your college career that tells me you are one trick pony and you didn’t develop other ways to score or contribute to your team success. Also tells me you don’t like contact and you always going to be a special team sub.

Brea took as many FT 71 in 4 and half years of college as Butler did in 18 games at Kentucky…..
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT