ADVERTISEMENT

Boley looked good

He seems to find the open receivers better and gets rid of the ball quicker than BV. He also runs the option pretty well as he did a couple times yesterday. He might not fare as well against better defenses, but I’d give him the reins and prepare for next year.
 
I’d give him a handful of plays against Texas and UL.

I’d be shocked if we return both GW and BV. Just the nature of the new era. You’re not going to have QB rooms with multiple upper classmen anymore.

For the sake of his development and future as well as depth for next year the staff needs to play him not only the next two games but come up with some sort of Arch Manning plan to get him some run next season as well.
 
I know this was Murray St, but Boley had some nice zip and touch on his throws. His pocket awareness wasn't great, but the Oline failed a couple of times too. He's my QB2 going forward.
He should have started from day one.
 
Vandergriff looked good against Southern Miss too. I wouldn’t put much into it. The bottom line is we have 3 horrible QBs on the roster.
The bottom line is we have a horrible offensive line and offensive line coach....and 1 horrible QB -wimsatt
 
He seems to find the open receivers better and gets rid of the ball quicker than BV. He also runs the option pretty well as he did a couple times yesterday. He might not fare as well against better defenses, but I’d give him the reins and prepare for next year.
I don’t think starting him at Texas in that environment would do him any favors. Only play him when that game gets out of hand and try to preserve his redshirt. There’s a very remote chance we could still get a bowl at 5-7 if there doesn’t end up being enough 6-6 teams. We’d obviously need to beat Louisville for that to be a chance, So I would avoid playing him against Texas if possible. Maybe give him more run against Louisville and see if he can win it for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigblueinsanity
Boley was at least able to come off the first read and go through the route tree. Thats an improvement over BV. Problem is, BV is tough as nails and can get some yards when the play goes bust (and that’s often with the horrid o-line). I’ve said it all year and will continue to bang the drum, Hamdan sucks. He’s done nothing to adjust his “system” to help BV and the offense. Literally no screen game. Continues to roll him left. Three and four options when BV is clearly one read and the line can’t hold long enough to get through the routes anyway. On drop backs he needs to have one read, a check down, and then get the hell out of dodge. Some simple RPO concepts and for the love of all things holy, implement a damned screen game. The offense, with the current “talent”, is never going to be great but could certainly be better. Hamadan hasn’t done a damn thing schematically to help that.
 
I don’t think starting him at Texas in that environment would do him any favors. Only play him when that game gets out of hand and try to preserve his redshirt. There’s a very remote chance we could still get a bowl at 5-7 if there doesn’t end up being enough 6-6 teams. We’d obviously need to beat Louisville for that to be a chance, So I would avoid playing him against Texas if possible. Maybe give him more run against Louisville and see if he can win it for us.
The bowl game, not that we're likely to get one, won't cost the redshirt. It doesn't count.
 
I know this was Murray St, but Boley had some nice zip and touch on his throws. His pocket awareness wasn't great, but the Oline failed a couple of times too. He's my QB2 going forward.
Stoops will go down the Titanic with bvg at the helm no kentuckians will tell him who to start sounds very reminisce of the cal years
 
I don’t think starting him at Texas in that environment would do him any favors. Only play him when that game gets out of hand and try to preserve his redshirt. There’s a very remote chance we could still get a bowl at 5-7 if there doesn’t end up being enough 6-6 teams. We’d obviously need to beat Louisville for that to be a chance, So I would avoid playing him against Texas if possible. Maybe give him more run against Louisville and see if he can win it for us.
Why is he a coward? That should be were he wants to start if he’s a football player. In fact, he should have been starting as a true freshman from day one. It’s the OL that needs fixing for UK to succeed not the QB. If we magically became the best OL in the country we would only run the ball more. Unless Stoops attitude leaves, it doesn’t matter who is our QB or what kind of line we have.
 
I realize we were “only” playing Murray State, but there is no question that Boley looked good.

His secret: he actually made “easy” throws of 5-15 yards look easy. He was under pressure at least twice, and flipped quick tosses or even under-handed passes to prevent a sack, and even gain a few yards.

And I was a tad surprised by his mobility. He looked comfortable running a little option . . . I found myself thinking, “heady play by Boley” a half-a-dozen times, where in the last 4 years I have seen our QB’s absorb losses that could have been avoided.
 
I realize we were “only” playing Murray State, but there is no question that Boley looked good.

His secret: he actually made “easy” throws of 5-15 yards look easy. He was under pressure at least twice, and flipped quick tosses or even under-handed passes to prevent a sack, and even gain a few yards.

And I was a tad surprised by his mobility. He looked comfortable running a little option . . . I found myself thinking, “heady play by Boley” a half-a-dozen times, where in the last 4 years I have seen our QB’s absorb losses that could have been avoided.


He's the best looking FR QB we've had in a long time.
 
A good trivia question: who was the last True Frosh to throw a TD pass at UK??

Jarod L. occurred to me, but he redshirted his True Frosh season, then prohibiting all play.

Is Couch the last True Frosh to complete a TD pass, (against U of L, August 31, 1996, 40 yard bomb to Issac Curtiss III in a 38-14 home loss.).
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT