You haven't went to one of the games in a dome then. There were over 70,000 when we won the championship in 2012, and most of them were wearing blue.I've never seen 60,000 show up for a basketball game. THings are changing!!! GBB!
58k against a top 25 team and people complained about reducing capacity. Show up before you complain people.does anyone know our attendance for the mizzou game ??? thanks.
So you're bragging about a less then capacity crowd? That's changing? How so?I've never seen 60,000 show up for a basketball game. THings are changing!!! GBB!
Football > shooty hoopsSo you're bragging about a less then capacity crowd? That's changing? How so?
UK bball could get 60,000 fans to any game against a top 25 opponent easily.
I think this is very true. However, until we develop some consistency in winning, crowds will remain inconsistent. I doubt the "if not more" but I think the "every bit as much" is certainly obtainable.During the 77-78 school year, UK had its best ever Football team and had the #1 rated preseason bball team. We all know that ranking was deserved as they went on to win the nc. At the time, I was 50-50 bball and Football....loved both. I clearly recall that during Football season, there was very little discussion about bball. The writers at the "hurled" couldn't write enough about Curci's team. That year proved to me that if Ky puts a high quality Football team on the field, Ky fans will care every bit as much (if not more) about Football as bball.
Guess I missed the part where it rained in Lexington yesterday... Somehow I stayed completely dry all day wearing shorts and a tee.
Football to me is something to watch until basketball starts up. I like it, but I don't love it. I think what makes me care for basketball more is that the action is going on for like 95% (just throwing a number out there) of the time you are watching. While football seems like there is maybe 25% action going on and so much dead time. Which is especially bad when you get a 4 hour game.
I would enjoy football more if they could do more to speed up the action. I think I have a little bit of ADHD in me and lose interest a little if I am not entertained constantly. The no huddle hurry up offenses help with that some. I just hate watching games where coaches take nearly all of the play clock each play. I understand if it is late in the game and you are trying to maintain a lead to do it.
I would like it better if they did like college basketball and shorten the play/shot clock even more to add even more plays to the game. They could drop it down to like a running 30 second play clock instead of the 40 second one. If players try to hold up play after tackles then give then a delay of game penalty. I just think football would be even better if they could speed it up and get it under 3 hours a game.
Ky, Just curious (respectfully)....did you play football? Did they have it in your high school? Were you raised in eastern Ky?....in a large city?